From self
Use when someone is confused about why they reacted the way they did — especially when it felt automatic, disproportionate, childlike, or like they heard a parental voice in their head. Triggers on: "왜 이렇게 반응했지", "자동으로 나왔어", "어린애처럼 굴었어", "부모님 목소리 같은", "inner child", "두 가지 목소리", "관계에서 같은 패턴이 반복돼", "ego state". Best for: understanding automatic reactions, mapping relational transaction patterns, finding the Adult response. Not for: general therapy or trauma processing — refer to a professional when responses involve deep distress.
How this skill is triggered — by the user, by Claude, or both
Slash command
/self:ego-state-identifierThe summary Claude sees in its skill listing — used to decide when to auto-load this skill
**Use when:**
Use when:
Not for:
| State | What it contains | Signs |
|---|---|---|
| Parent (P) | Internalized voices and rules from authority figures | Moralizing, "should/must", giving unsolicited advice, feeling righteous |
| — Nurturing Parent | Caring, supportive | "You did your best", "Let me help you" |
| — Critical Parent | Rule-enforcing, judging | "You should know better", harsh self-criticism |
| Adult (A) | Here-and-now processor — facts, options, current reality | Asking clarifying questions, "I noticed that...", genuinely curious |
| Child (C) | Emotional responses and relational strategies from childhood | Feeling small, disproportionate emotion, wanting to please or rebel |
| — Free Child | Spontaneous, creative, playful | Joy, curiosity, creative flow states |
| — Adapted Child | Developed to survive original family system | People-pleasing, sulking, compliance, rebellion |
Contamination: Parent or Child "bleeds into" Adult thinking (prejudice, magical thinking).
Exclusion: One state chronically dominant, others suppressed.
Step 1 — Identify the event. What happened? What was the internal experience (thought, feeling, body, impulse)?
Step 2 — Map the ego state. Language is a strong indicator. Did it feel familiar — like something from childhood? Was it rational and present-focused, or patterned and past-loaded?
Step 3 — Identify the transaction (if relational). Which state was the user speaking from? Which state was the other person speaking from? Was the transaction complementary, crossed, or covert (ulterior)?
Step 4 — Identify patterns. Do certain people or situations reliably trigger this state?
Step 5 — Name the growth move. What would the Adult response look like? What would Free Child offer instead of Adapted Child?
Ego State Analysis
------------------
Dominant state: [Parent / Adult / Child — and which variant]
Key signal: [specific language, emotion, or behavior that identified it]
Positive intent of this state: [what it was trying to do — always name this]
Cost in this situation: [what it produced that wasn't serving the person]
Relational dynamic (if applicable): [who was speaking from where, what got crossed]
Pattern: [does this repeat? in what contexts?]
Adult-state alternative: [what a grounded, present-focused response would look like]
Free Child alternative (if relevant): [what authentic, undefended response might look like]
| Claude | You |
|---|---|
| Maps the reaction to a specific ego state | Share the specific situation and internal experience |
| Names the positive intent of even Critical Parent or Adapted Child | Sit with whether the pattern resonates |
| Identifies where transactions crossed or went covert | Notice which state you're in the next time it triggers |
| Offers the Adult and Free Child alternatives | Practice pausing before the automatic state takes over |
Key insight to deliver: Every ego state had a positive original intent. The question is not "why am I broken" but "does this strategy still make sense now?"
attachment-style-mirror — for relational patterns at the attachment levelshadow-persona — for what is being suppressed or performed at a deeper levelidentity-explorer — when ego state patterns feel tied to core self-conceptnpx claudepluginhub newkayak12/claude-skills --plugin selfAnalyzes relationship dynamics using a five-layer structural framework and psychoanalytic depth. Helps users see unconscious patterns in relationships.
Routes psychology requests to the appropriate cognitive/behavioral analysis tool based on the user's situation — bias identification, motivation diagnosis, persuasion, behavior change, or heuristic assessment.
Creates, edits, and optimizes skills for Claude Code, including drafting, evaluating with test prompts, iterating on performance, and improving skill descriptions for better triggering accuracy.