By human-avatar
Apply 171 structured reasoning frameworks to any problem—logic, ethics, creativity, decision-making, systems thinking, communication, strategy, and writing—as invokable commands that analyze, critique, and generate solutions.
Entry point for the sensory observation toolkit. Routes to the right observational skill based on your situation. Use when you say 'sensory', 'what are we missing', 'look more carefully', 'separate signal from noise', 'too much information', 'what actually matters here', 'observe this carefully', or want observational precision applied without knowing which specific tool fits.
Maps who needs to be aligned, who already is, and how to build the coalition a proposal needs to succeed. Triggers: 'coalition building', 'who do I need to get on board', 'map the support', 'build alignment', 'who will support this', 'who will block this'.
Identifies group psychology shaping a discussion or team — groupthink, status dynamics, coalition formation, psychological safety. Triggers: 'group dynamics', 'why does this team behave like this', 'groupthink check', 'why won't people speak up', 'meeting dynamics', 'team dysfunction'.
Maps the actual incentives driving behaviour — distinguishing stated motivations from the real incentive structures that shape what people do. Triggers: 'incentive analysis', 'why are they doing this', 'what are the actual incentives', 'follow the incentives', 'what does the system reward'.
Maps who holds power — formal authority, informal influence, gatekeeping, expertise — and how it flows. Triggers: 'power map', 'who has power here', 'who actually decides', 'map the politics', 'who do I need to get on board', 'who are the gatekeepers'.
Own this plugin?
Verify ownership to unlock analytics, metadata editing, and a verified badge. GitHub access is read-only (username + org membership).
Sign in to claimOwn this plugin?
Verify ownership to unlock analytics, metadata editing, and a verified badge. GitHub access is read-only (username + org membership).
Sign in to claimBased on adoption, maintenance, documentation, and repository signals. Not a security audit or endorsement.
s4h skills-for-humanityStructured reasoning methodologies from history's most rigorous thinkers, packaged as Claude Code skills.
| Skills | |
|---|---|
| Think Sharper | /s4h-logic/s4h-probability/s4h-decision/s4h-constraint/s4h-game-theory/s4h-epistemology/s4h-investigation/s4h-economics/s4h-information/s4h-cognition |
| Think Differently | /s4h-creativity/s4h-analogy/s4h-play/s4h-evolution/s4h-design |
| Think About People | /s4h-communication/s4h-social/s4h-emotional/s4h-ethics/s4h-identity/s4h-narrative/s4h-psychology/s4h-mindset/s4h-writing/s4h-linguistics |
| Think in Time & Systems | /s4h-systems/s4h-temporal/s4h-historical/s4h-resource/s4h-strategy/s4h-network/s4h-ecology |
| See More Clearly | /s4h-aesthetic/s4h-sensory |
Each skill is a complete procedure: a defined problem type, a sequence of moves, a structured output. Not a concept to apply — a method to run.
Lineage: de Bono · Meadows · Altshuller · Minto · Goldratt · Tetlock · Klein · Mill · Kant · Aristotle · Noddings · Rawls · Sun Tzu · Clausewitz · Musashi · Nash · Axelrod · Vickrey · Shapley · Spence · Marshall · Coase · Ostrom · Granovetter · Barab%C3%A1si · Shannon · Norman · Lakoff · Grice · Kahneman · Tansley · Dawkins
npx @human-avatar/skills-for-humanity
Run again to update. Restart Claude Code when done.
/s4h
Describe your situation. Routes to the right methodology automatically. You don't need to know which skill fits — that's the point.
Every skill pauses before running: states its read, confirms what it's actually analysing, and asks how deep to go. Correct the framing at any point — the analysis follows the corrected read, not the original one.
Decisions — /s4h-decision for structure, /s4h-decision-premortem-analysis to stress-test before committing, /s4h-constraint-hardness-testing to separate real obstacles from assumed ones.
Complex situations — /s4h-systems to map why something keeps producing the same outcome, /s4h-game-theory for the incentive structure underneath, /s4h-historical for the pattern it's an instance of.
Creative work — /s4h-creativity-brainstorm for multi-method exploration, /s4h-constraint-rule-inversion to make limits generative, /s4h-aesthetic-elegance-testing to find what's unnecessary.
Communication — /s4h-communication-objection-mapping to anticipate resistance, /s4h-narrative-tension-mapping to find what earns attention, /s4h-writing-rhetoric to audit what a piece is actually doing.
Ethics — /s4h-ethics-check for a fast multi-framework scan, /s4h-ethics-council for adversarial analysis, /s4h-identity-values-clarification to test against what you actually value.
npx claudepluginhub human-avatar/skills-for-humanityA deterministic thinking partner that challenges assumptions and applies 150+ mental models to sharpen decisions, solve problems, and think more clearly. Features orientation detection, cognitive operations framework, and structured diagnostic workflows.
Structured thinking methods as multi-agent sessions — Six Thinking Hats, Adversarial Debate, Disney Method, Pre-Mortem, Polarity Management, TRIZ, W³, Troika Consulting, Wise Crowds, First Principles Decomposition, Analogical Transfer, Morphological Box, Futures Cone — plus meta-cognitive modules (Bias Check, Frame Check, Method Check) that reflect on the thinking itself
Structured thinking methods that counteract LLM reasoning biases during problem exploration — first principles, inversion, constraint manipulation, perspective forcing, analogy search, and more, with user-gated parallel subagent exploration for deep dives
39 eval-informed thinking skills and mental models for Claude Code
Comprehensive collection of 33 production-ready skills for strategic thinking, decision-making, research methods, architecture design, and problem-solving. Includes frameworks like Bayesian reasoning, kill criteria, layered reasoning, information architecture, and more.
Truth-seeking sparring partner for Claude Code. Challenges claims, decisions, and documents through structured dialectical analysis.