From antigravity-awesome-skills
Analyzes Chinese propositions, debates, hidden premises, rebuttals, and withdrawal conditions for the CrossFrame Suite. Used when CrossFrame routes tasks about argument testing or debate analysis.
How this skill is triggered — by the user, by Claude, or both
Slash command
/antigravity-awesome-skills:crossframe-debateThe summary Claude sees in its skill listing — used to decide when to auto-load this skill
- Use when `crossframe-suite` routes an explicit CrossFrame task about propositions, debate, hidden premises, rebuttals, strongest opposing arguments, evidence requirements, or withdrawal conditions.
agents/openai.yamlevals/crossframe-debate-smoke-tests.mdexamples/failure-samples.mdexamples/philosophical-proposition-case.mdexamples/public-proposition-case.mdexamples/relationship-proposition-case.mdprotocols/debate-protocol.mdreferences/debate-failure-patterns.mdreferences/debate-quality-gates.mdtemplates/debate-analysis-output.mdcrossframe-suite routes an explicit CrossFrame task about propositions, debate, hidden premises, rebuttals, strongest opposing arguments, evidence requirements, or withdrawal conditions.This AAS-ready copy preserves the original CrossFrame skill body below. Chinese remains the canonical semantic layer; English metadata is only for discovery, installation, and repository review.
crossframe-suite routing; do not apply it as a generic default reasoning layer.本 skill 不独立触发。 所有 CrossFrame 任务统一从
crossframe-suite入口调度。用户无需直接调用本 skill;suite 根据路由规则在需要时自动加载。
如果命题论证之后要写文章、公共评论、读书笔记或案例沉淀,先读取 ../crossframe-suite/SKILL.md 做总调度;本 skill 只负责命题拆解、正反结构、证据要求和撤回条件。
crossframe-debate 是 crossframe 的平行轻入口,用于把一个命题拆成可检验论证,而不是帮助某一方赢辩论。
中文为权威语义;英文只用于 skill id、文件名和接口说明。遇到中英文理解冲突时,以中文术语和中文判断为准。
每次触发后,先读取 canonical skill 和路由图,不复制 CrossFrame 全文:
../crossframe/SKILL.md。../crossframe/references/read-routing-map.md。../crossframe/references/continuity-bundles.md,并按需使用 ../crossframe/worksheets/source-continuity-check.md;未完成联读时只能降档。../crossframe/templates/read-state-capsule.md 规定的 v5-read-state-capsule,并在高责任、公共、AI/过程性产物、生命周期、无法退出主体或文章输出场景执行 ../crossframe/worksheets/source-anchor-integrity-check.md。如果胶囊缺失,回到 ../crossframe/SKILL.md 补齐;本 skill 不重新发明源路由。protocols/debate-protocol.md。templates/debate-analysis-output.md。references/debate-quality-gates.md 和 references/debate-failure-patterns.md。按命题类型追加 canonical 路由:
收到命题后,默认输出:
默认使用 templates/debate-analysis-output.md。若用户只要短答,也必须保留最小结构:
输出前检查:
npx claudepluginhub sickn33/antigravity-awesome-skills --plugin antigravity-bundle-aas-mobile-app-builderDesigns logical argument structures for academic papers, policy briefs, or debates — developing a thesis, evidence, warrants, and rebuttals with internal validity and explicit counterargument handling.
Surfaces the warrant, audits evidence, and addresses counterarguments in persuasive writing. Use when an argument has holes or evidence doesn't connect to the claim.
Devil's advocate mode that surfaces the strongest objections to the user's position, starting with the most damaging flaw.