From local-seo-audit
Identifies missing content opportunities vs. competitors, covering keyword gaps, topical cluster gaps, and AI visibility gaps. Useful for SEO content strategy.
How this skill is triggered — by the user, by Claude, or both
Slash command
/local-seo-audit:content-gapsThe summary Claude sees in its skill listing — used to decide when to auto-load this skill
Content gap analysis is the systematic identification of topics, formats, and pages that competitors have and your client doesn't — or where competitors outperform significantly in depth. In 2025, content gaps operate on 3 layers: (1) keyword gaps (traditional — competitor ranks for keyword, client doesn't); (2) topical cluster gaps (competitor has full pillar+cluster architecture on a service,...
Content gap analysis is the systematic identification of topics, formats, and pages that competitors have and your client doesn't — or where competitors outperform significantly in depth. In 2025, content gaps operate on 3 layers: (1) keyword gaps (traditional — competitor ranks for keyword, client doesn't); (2) topical cluster gaps (competitor has full pillar+cluster architecture on a service, client has one thin page); (3) AI visibility gaps (competitor's content is cited in AI Overviews or by ChatGPT/Perplexity, client's isn't). The third layer is new in 2025 and often the highest-value gap: AI Overviews appear for 20–35% of queries, and being excluded from AIO = losing 30–45% of potential CTR on those queries (Dataslayer 2025). FAQPage schema is the single highest-leverage fix: sites with FAQPage are cited in AIO at 3.2× the rate of pages without it (Amsive 2025).
2025 content gap benchmarks:
Numbered Action Plan:
Output files:
{AUDIT_DIR}/content-gaps.md — gap analysis with priority matrix{REPORTS_DIR}/phase-5-content-gaps.pdf — auto-generated PDF after phase completesRead {AUDIT_DIR}/intake-data.md — business name, services, location, goals.
Read {AUDIT_DIR}/content-inventory.md — what client currently has (page list + word counts).
Read {AUDIT_DIR}/competitor-profiles.md — competitor content strategies and page counts.
Tools for this phase:
| Tool | Purpose | Cost |
|---|---|---|
| Ahrefs Content Gap | Shows keywords competitors rank for that client doesn't — by topic cluster | Paid |
| SEMrush Keyword Gap | Side-by-side keyword comparison with traffic estimates | Paid |
| BuzzSumo | Identify top-performing competitor content by shares and backlinks | Paid |
| AlsoAsked.com | PAA-based question mapping — identify unanswered questions per topic | Freemium |
| AnswerThePublic | Visualize question clusters around service topics | Freemium |
| Google PAA boxes | Live "People Also Ask" questions — free, real-time | Free |
| Google Search | Manual SERP analysis per topic — identify AIO presence | Free |
| Google Search Console | Which queries get impressions but poor CTR — existing gap opportunities | Free |
2025 Content Gap Context:
Use Ahrefs Content Gap (enter client vs. top 3 competitors):
Topics all top competitors rank for = table stakes. Missing these = immediate priority:
| Topic/Keyword | Comp 1 Rank | Comp 2 Rank | Comp 3 Rank | Client Rank | Monthly Volume | Priority |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| [topic] | P[X] | P[X] | P[X] | Not ranking | [est.] | Critical |
| [topic] | P[X] | P[X] | P[X] | Not ranking | [est.] | High |
Topics only the #1-ranking competitor addresses = replication opportunity:
| Topic | Competitor | Comp URL | Page Type | Est. Volume | Opportunity |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| [topic] | [comp] | [url] | Blog/Service/FAQ | [vol] | High/Med |
For each competitor (from competitor-profiles.md), list their top 10 pages by traffic (Ahrefs → Organic Pages):
| Competitor | Top Content | Traffic/Month | Content Type | Client Equivalent? |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Comp 1 | [page title] | [est.] | Pillar/Blog | Yes/No |
| Comp 2 | [page title] | [est.] | Service/FAQ | Yes/No |
Beyond topics — are the right content FORMATS missing? Identified from competitor analysis:
| Format | Client Has? | Competitors Have? | AIO Eligible? | Impact | Priority |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| "How much does [service] cost in [city]?" pricing guide | Yes/No | Yes/No | High | High | |
| "[Service A] vs. [Service B]" comparison page | Yes/No | Yes/No | High | High | |
| "Signs you need [service]" diagnostic guide | Yes/No | Yes/No | Medium | Medium | |
| "DIY vs. Professional [service]" guide | Yes/No | Yes/No | Medium | Medium | |
| "[Service] process: step-by-step" explainer | Yes/No | Yes/No | High | High | |
| "How long does [service] take?" FAQ | Yes/No | Yes/No | High | Medium | |
| "Emergency [service] [city]" — intent page | Yes/No | Yes/No | High | Critical | |
| Local guide: "Complete guide to [service] in [city]" | Yes/No | Yes/No | High | High | |
| "Best [service] in [city]" owned list (client-authored) | Yes/No | Yes/No | High | High | |
| Seasonal: "[service] in winter/summer" | Yes/No | Yes/No | Low | Low | |
| Video: before/after showing [service] | Yes/No | Yes/No | Medium | High |
Identify through: low-KD keywords in Ahrefs, PAA questions with poor answers, AlsoAsked.com questions with no direct client/competitor content:
| Topic/Question | Search Volume | KD (1-100) | Best Existing Answer | Quality Gap | Opportunity |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| [topic] | [vol] | [KD] | [site.com] | Poor/Fair | Win featured snippet |
Use Google Trends + Ahrefs Explorer → filter for growing keywords:
| Emerging Topic | Trend Direction | Current Volume | Projected Volume | First-Mover Opportunity |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| [topic] | Rising ↑ | [vol] | [proj.] | High/Medium |
For target keywords, check PAA boxes — identify questions where no result fully satisfies:
| Question | Source | Current Answer Quality | Content Type Needed | AIO Priority |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| [question] | Google PAA | Poor/Fair | FAQ + HowTo schema | High/Med |
Use Ahrefs → SERP Features → filter for "Featured Snippet" in keywords client doesn't own:
| Query | Current Snippet Owner | Snippet Quality | Win Strategy | Effort |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| [query] | [site] | Thin | Direct answer + table/list | 1–2 hrs |
AIO appears for 20–35% of local service queries. Being absent from AIO = invisible to AI-first searchers.
For top 30 target keywords, test AIO presence:
| Keyword | AIO Appears? | Client Cited in AIO? | AIO Format | Content Fix Needed |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| [keyword] | Yes/No | Yes/No | List/Paragraph/Table | FAQPage + direct answer |
AIO content requirements to win citation:
AIO Gap Summary:
| Service Cluster | AIO Appears? | Client Cited? | Pages Needed |
|---|---|---|---|
| [service 1] | Yes for X/10 queries | No | [specific pages] |
Don't just create new content — improving existing pages often delivers results in 2–4 weeks vs. 3–6 months for new pages.
From GSC + Ahrefs → Organic Keywords → filter for positions 4–10:
| Page | Current Position | Target Keyword | Monthly Volume | Action | Effort |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| [URL] | 5 | [keyword] | [vol] | Add FAQ section + schema | 1–2 hrs |
| [URL] | 8 | [keyword] | [vol] | Add 500 words + internal links | 2–3 hrs |
From GSC → filter positions 11–20 for high-volume keywords:
| Page | Position | Keyword | Volume | Action | Effort |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| [URL] | 13 | [keyword] | [vol] | Expand + earn 3 links | 3–5 hrs + link |
Pages generating many impressions but <2% CTR → title/meta problem, not ranking problem:
| Page | Impressions/Month | CTR | Position | Recommended Title | Effort |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| [URL] | [X] | [X%] | [pos] | [new title — add emotional trigger] | 15 min |
From GSC YoY comparison:
| Page | Prior Clicks | Current Clicks | YoY Change | Action | Priority |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| [URL] | [X] | [Y] | -[%] | Refresh stats/examples + schema | Critical if >50% |
Location-specific content gaps often have lower competition and high conversion intent.
| [City 1] | [City 2] | [Neighborhood 1] | [Neighborhood 2] | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| [Service A] | ✅ | ❌ | ❌ | ❌ |
| [Service B] | ✅ | ✅ | ❌ | ❌ |
| [Service C] | ❌ | ❌ | ❌ | ❌ |
Priority: red cells with highest population/search density first.
| Query Pattern | Volume | Client Page? | Action |
|---|---|---|---|
| "Emergency [service] [city]" | [vol] | Yes/No | Create dedicated emergency page |
| "[service] open now [city]" | [vol] | Yes/No | Add hours + GBP service markup |
| "Same day [service] [city]" | [vol] | Yes/No | Create/optimize service page |
| "24 hour [service] [city]" | [vol] | Yes/No | Create/optimize service page |
Score all identified gaps. Build/improve the highest-priority first:
| Gap | Content Type | Est. Monthly Traffic | Competition (KD) | Time to Rank | Impact (1–5) | Feasibility (1–5) | Priority | Effort |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| [table-stakes topic] | Blog post | [vol] | Low (<20) | 1–3 months | 4 | 4 | 16 | 4–6 hrs |
| [missing service page] | Service page | [vol] | Medium (20–50) | 2–4 months | 5 | 4 | 20 | 6–10 hrs |
| [unowned snippet] | FAQ section | [vol] | Low | 2–8 weeks | 4 | 5 | 20 | 1–2 hrs |
| [AIO gap] | FAQ + schema | [vol] | N/A | 2–6 weeks | 5 | 5 | 25 | 1–2 hrs |
| [P4–10 quick win] | Expand existing | [vol] | Low | 2–4 weeks | 4 | 5 | 20 | 1–2 hrs |
Top 10 Priority Content Pieces (ordered by Priority Score):
Write complete findings to {AUDIT_DIR}/content-gaps.md with YAML frontmatter:
---
skill: research/content-gaps
phase: 5
date: [YYYY-MM-DD]
business: [Business Name]
url: [URL]
score: [X/100]
gaps_identified: [X]
quick_wins: [X]
aio_gaps: [X]
table_stakes_missing: [X]
---
Include:
Key consumers:
research/keyword-gaps — keyword mapping for identified content gap topicsresearch/topical-gaps — maps gaps to topical authority structureoutput/report-generation — feeds quick wins and 30/90-day content plansnpx claudepluginhub mshahiddigital/agentic-local-seo-auditCompares your site against competitors to find missing topics, keyword gaps, and editorial calendar opportunities. Prioritizes gaps into Quick Wins, Strategic Builds, and Long-term.
Audits content quality and strategy: thin/duplicate content, cannibalization, service/location pages, blog posts, FAQ content, and schema triggers.
Audits content gaps and decay using Ahrefs MCP data: missing topics, thin coverage, outdated content, decaying pages. Produces a create/update/merge/prune roadmap for content catalogs.