From thinking-frameworks-skills
Cross-references proposed analogies against a shared catalog to flag reuse, classifying each as new, reused, or adjacent. Prevents stale analogies before presenting framings.
How this skill is triggered — by the user, by Claude, or both
Slash command
/thinking-frameworks-skills:check-analogy-noveltyThe summary Claude sees in its skill listing — used to decide when to auto-load this skill
- [Workflow](#workflow)
Related skills: Called by the Intuition Builder after generate-analogy-set and before presenting framings. Reads shared-context/analogy-catalog.md. Does NOT write to the catalog — that's update-analogy-catalog's job, fired on publish.
For each of the 5 framings:
- [ ] Step 1: Extract the analogy's source domain (e.g., "library card catalog")
- [ ] Step 2: Extract the analogy's target concept (e.g., "KV cache")
- [ ] Step 3: Grep analogy-catalog.md for exact or near-exact source × target match
- [ ] Step 4: Classify: new | reused-from-catalog | adjacent-to-catalog
- [ ] Step 5: For reused/adjacent, cite the catalog entry with its post
"Close variant" = same source domain (library, immune system, bucket brigade) even if different specific instance.
Proposed framings for KV cache:
Catalog check:
library → KV cache, or ring buffer, or index.Output:
But: if the catalog had an entry "Library index → tokenizer vocabulary", framing 1's adjacency would trigger: "adjacent-to-catalog — library appears once for a different target". Flag softly.
new by definition. Note this once in the output.{new | reused-from-catalog | adjacent-to-catalog} with citation.npx claudepluginhub lyndonkl/claude --plugin thinking-frameworks-skillsVerifies each analogy in a substacker draft carries mechanical weight (explains vs. decorates) and checks analogy-catalog.md for novelty and domain fit.
Routes analogical reasoning to the right sub-skill: boundary-testing, domain-transfer, perspective-shifting, or structure-mapping. Use for finding comparisons, importing solutions, or testing analogies.
Multi-framework content review with convergent synthesis. Each lens applies a named analytical framework — grounded in published source material, not persona impersonation — to the target content. Parallel dispatch, web research or user-provided references, convergent synthesis, prioritized action list. Triggers: expert panel, expert review, expert audit, panel review, multi-lens review, framework review, content audit, workshop audit, strategy review, get expert feedback, advisory review.