Stats
Actions
Tags
From skills-for-humanity
Guides strategic thinking to find minimum interventions that achieve objectives when outmatched or under-resourced. Includes framing checks and alternative generation.
How this skill is triggered — by the user, by Claude, or both
Slash command
/skills-for-humanity:s4h-strategy-force-economyThe summary Claude sees in its skill listing — used to decide when to auto-load this skill
Sun Tzu's highest strategic achievement is the victory that costs nothing — where the opponent's resistance collapses without direct contest: "Supreme excellence consists in breaking the enemy's resistance without fighting." This is not passivity. It is the discipline of identifying where a small input creates a large output — where the terrain, timing, information asymmetry, or a single relati...
Sun Tzu's highest strategic achievement is the victory that costs nothing — where the opponent's resistance collapses without direct contest: "Supreme excellence consists in breaking the enemy's resistance without fighting." This is not passivity. It is the discipline of identifying where a small input creates a large output — where the terrain, timing, information asymmetry, or a single relationship multiplies your effective force without requiring you to match the opponent unit for unit.
The force economy principle asks: what is the minimum intervention that achieves the objective? Not merely because resources must be conserved (though they must), but because the maximum-force approach almost always generates the maximum resistance. Brute force signals intention, consumes capital, and invites a symmetrical response from an opponent with more of everything. The indirect approach — Basil Liddell Hart's formulation — achieves more by creating the conditions in which less is required.
The discipline is finding the leverage point: the node in the system where a small input produces a disproportionate output. Not all nodes are equal. Most effort has roughly proportional effect. Leverage points are structural exceptions — and finding them before acting is the core skill.
Step 1: State the objective Define what success looks like clearly and specifically. Vague objectives produce vague force economy analyses. What must be true for this to be considered won?
Framing check: Confirm the specific situation before continuing. State the objective and the resource constraint in one sentence, then use AskUserQuestion:
Step 2: Maximum-force approach What does the brute-force path look like? If you matched the opponent resource-for-resource and attacked directly, what would that cost in time, money, relationships, and attention? Name the full cost. This is your baseline.
Step 3: Minimum-force alternatives What approaches achieve the same objective at lower cost? Generate at least three alternatives — not as compromises but as genuine paths. Consider: approaches that go around rather than through, approaches that use the opponent's own momentum, approaches that make the contested ground irrelevant.
Before narrowing: Show the complete generated set of alternatives to the user first. Use AskUserQuestion:
Step 4: Leverage points Where in this system does a small input create a large output? Candidates: a key relationship that unlocks others, an information advantage that reshapes the opponent's behavior, a timing move that creates conditions others must respond to, a position that creates a cascade of favorable effects without requiring follow-on force.
Before narrowing: Show all identified leverage point candidates to the user before selecting the highest-leverage node. Use AskUserQuestion:
Step 5: Non-contest approaches Can the objective be achieved without direct competition at all? Options: go around (find uncontested ground), ally with (add force through alliance), make irrelevant (change the game so the contested position no longer matters), wait (until the opponent's overextension creates the opening).
Before proceeding, use the AskUserQuestion tool. State your interpretation of the situation in 1–2 sentences — what is being analyzed and what the core question is — then ask:
Proceed based on their selection. If the user reframes, incorporate the correction before running any analysis.
Objective [Specific statement of what winning looks like]
Maximum-Force Approach [What the brute-force path costs — time, money, relationships, attention, risk]
Minimum-Force Alternatives
Leverage Point [The single highest-leverage node — small input, large output — and why it has this property]
Non-Contest Approaches [Options that achieve the objective without direct competition — go around, ally with, make irrelevant, wait]
Recommended Approach [The recommended path with resource estimate and the reasoning for why this achieves the objective at acceptable cost]
Good position reduces force required — pair with /s4h-strategy-positioning to understand whether investment in positioning now reduces force cost later. Alliances multiply effective force — pair with /s4h-strategy-alliance when the leverage point involves bringing others in. Force economy analysis is most powerful when the objective is clear; if it isn't, run /s4h-strategy-victory first to establish what you're actually trying to achieve.
After delivering this output, use AskUserQuestion to offer the next move:
/s4h-resource-leverage-mapping — Find leverage that amplifies force economy/s4h-strategy-positioning — Position to maximise force economy/s4h-resource-allocation-analysis — Allocate to the areas of greatest force economynpx claudepluginhub human-avatar/skills-for-humanityGuides competitive strategy to avoid pyrrhic victories by using proportionate force, preserving resources, and maintaining capacity for follow-on engagements.
Routes to the correct strategy skill for adversarial, competitive, or negotiation situations. After framing the challenge, it directs to specialized skills like terrain analysis, intelligence auditing, timing, force economy, or positioning.
Evaluates or develops strategies using Rumelt's kernel: Diagnosis, Guiding Policy, Coherent Actions. Detects bad strategies like fluff, unaddressed challenges, and goal lists.