From skills-for-humanity
Helps identify what truly matters by applying variance, persistence, specificity, and counterfactual tests. Triggers on phrases like 'what actually matters here' and 'separate signal from noise'.
How this skill is triggered — by the user, by Claude, or both
Slash command
/skills-for-humanity:s4h-sensory-signal-detectionThe summary Claude sees in its skill listing — used to decide when to auto-load this skill
In any rich environment — data, feedback, conversation, a market — most of what is present is noise. Signal is what varies with the thing you're trying to understand; noise varies independently. The challenge is not finding more information, it's knowing which information is doing real work.
In any rich environment — data, feedback, conversation, a market — most of what is present is noise. Signal is what varies with the thing you're trying to understand; noise varies independently. The challenge is not finding more information, it's knowing which information is doing real work.
Step 1: Inventory Everything Present List all the data, observations, or inputs available. Don't filter yet — complete the inventory first.
Framing check: Confirm the specific subject before continuing. State what you've identified — the actual environment or dataset being analyzed and what outcome or phenomenon the user is trying to understand — in one sentence, then use AskUserQuestion:
Step 2: Variance Test For each item: does it vary with the outcome or phenomenon you're trying to understand? Signal co-varies with what you care about. Noise varies on its own schedule.
Step 3: Persistence Test Is this item consistently present across time and contexts, or did it appear once? Persistent patterns are more likely to be signal. One-off observations may be noise, anomaly, or coincidence.
Step 4: Specificity Test Is this item unique to this situation, or is it always present? Always-present background conditions are usually noise. What is specific to the case is more likely signal.
Step 5: Counterfactual Test If this item changed or disappeared, would the outcome change? If yes: probable signal. If the outcome would be the same regardless: probable noise.
Step 6: Classify and Summarise Assign a classification to each item and present the full classified inventory to the user.
Before narrowing: Show the complete classified set to the user first. Use AskUserQuestion:
Then identify the top signals to act on.
Before proceeding, use the AskUserQuestion tool. State your interpretation of the situation in 1–2 sentences — what is being analyzed and what the core question is — then ask:
Proceed based on their selection. If the user reframes, incorporate the correction before running any analysis.
| Element | Varies with Outcome? | Persistent? | Specific? | Counterfactual? | Classification |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ... | ... | ... | ... | ... | Signal / Noise / Unclear |
Classifications: Clear Signal / Probable Signal / Unclear / Probable Noise / Clear Noise
When in doubt, classify as "unclear" rather than forcing a label — the act of flagging uncertainty is itself useful. Run this when a situation feels overwhelming or when a team is arguing about what matters.
After delivering this output, use AskUserQuestion to offer the next move:
/s4h-sensory-structured-observation — Observe in depth around the detected signals/s4h-aesthetic-pattern-detection — Find patterns in the signals/s4h-systems-feedback-mapping — Map feedback systems the signals revealnpx claudepluginhub human-avatar/skills-for-humanitySeparates meaningful signal from background noise in data, communications, or analysis. Applies signal-to-noise ratio thinking to extract what matters.
Performs Analysis of Competing Hypotheses (ACH) to evaluate multiple hypotheses against evidence via disconfirmation-focused matrix, diagnosticity, sensitivity analysis, and falsification milestones.
Synthesises user signals from multi-research sources (interviews, support tickets, NPS, app reviews, sales calls) into a weighted insight brief with confidence ratings, divergence analysis, and research gaps.