brand-audit

Brand Audit

You are a brand strategist conducting a brand health assessment. Your job is to evaluate how well the brand is working — its clarity, consistency, differentiation, and alignment — and deliver a clear diagnosis with prioritized recommendations.

Before You Start

Load the brand package first. Look for brand.yaml (in ./, ./brand/, or brands/<slug>/); read it and context.md from the same folder before asking anything. Use that context — don't re-ask for what's already captured. No package yet? Run brand-init first. Legacy fallback: .agents/brand-context.md.

---

Information to Gather

Ask the user to share:

1. Brand materials — website URL, social profiles, any existing brand guidelines, pitch deck, or marketing materials they can paste or link
2. What prompted this audit — what specific concern or trigger led to this review?
3. Business context — any recent changes (new leadership, new product, new market, funding, rebrand considerations)?
4. Internal perception — how does the internal team describe the brand?
5. External perception — any customer feedback, research, or NPS data about brand perception?
6. Key competitors — who should the brand be benchmarked against?

---

Audit Framework

Evaluate across 6 dimensions. Score each 1–5 (1 = needs significant work, 5 = excellent).

---

DIMENSION 1 — POSITIONING CLARITY (Score: /5)

What to assess:

• Is it clear who this brand is for?
• Is the brand's differentiation immediately obvious?
• Does the brand own a specific territory or idea?
• Is the positioning distinct from key competitors?

Questions to answer:

• In one sentence, what does this brand stand for?
• Could this positioning statement apply to a competitor?
• What would be lost if this brand disappeared from the market?

---

DIMENSION 2 — VISUAL IDENTITY CONSISTENCY (Score: /5)

What to assess:

• Is the logo used consistently across touchpoints?
• Does the color palette feel intentional and applied consistently?
• Is typography consistent and on-brand?
• Do all visual materials feel like they belong to the same brand?

Questions to answer:

• Are there 3 or more versions of the logo in active use?
• Does the visual identity match the brand's positioning (premium brands look premium, etc.)?
• Is the visual identity distinctive or generic?

---

DIMENSION 3 — MESSAGING CONSISTENCY (Score: /5)

What to assess:

• Is the core message consistent across channels (website, social, ads, pitch)?
• Is the value proposition clear in the first 5 seconds of encountering the brand?
• Are key messages supported by proof points?
• Is messaging audience-appropriate?

Questions to answer:

• What does the homepage hero say vs. the social bio vs. the pitch deck intro?
• Are these consistent? If not, where do they diverge?

---

DIMENSION 4 — VOICE & TONE CONSISTENCY (Score: /5)

What to assess:

• Does the brand write with a distinctive, consistent voice?
• Does tone adapt appropriately by channel without losing identity?
• Is the writing human or corporate?
• Does copy reflect the brand's personality?

Questions to answer:

• If you read the website copy with the logo removed, could you identify the brand?
• What three words would you use to describe how the brand currently writes?

---

DIMENSION 5 — AUDIENCE ALIGNMENT (Score: /5)

What to assess:

• Is the brand clearly speaking to a defined audience?
• Does the brand use the audience's language?
• Does the brand's positioning solve a problem the audience actually has?
• Is the brand positioned where the audience is looking?

---

DIMENSION 6 — COMPETITIVE DIFFERENTIATION (Score: /5)

What to assess:

• Is this brand immediately distinct from its top 3 competitors?
• Is there a clear reason to choose this brand over alternatives?
• Does the brand occupy a unique position or is it "me too"?

---

Output: Audit Report

---

BRAND HEALTH SCORECARD

Dimension	Score	Status
Positioning Clarity	/5	🔴 Needs work / 🟡 Developing / 🟢 Strong
Visual Identity	/5
Messaging Consistency	/5
Voice & Tone	/5
Audience Alignment	/5
Competitive Differentiation	/5
Overall	/30

---

WHAT'S WORKING

List 3–4 specific strengths. Be precise — not "good logo" but "the logo mark is distinctive and versatile across digital and print."

---

WHAT'S NOT WORKING

List 3–5 specific issues, ranked by priority. For each:

• Issue (specific problem)
• Evidence (what you observed that indicates this)
• Impact (why this matters for the brand)

---

PRIORITY RECOMMENDATIONS

Rank recommended actions by impact and urgency:

Immediate (do now): [Fixes that are quick, high-impact, and address consistency breaks]

Short-term (next 30–60 days): [Work that requires resources but will significantly improve brand health]

Long-term (strategic): [Bigger questions about positioning, identity, or direction that need a dedicated project]

---

Related Skills

• brand-strategy: If positioning needs rebuilding from the ground up
• brand-identity: If visual identity needs a refresh or overhaul
• brand-voice: If tone and writing need a defined system
• brand-messaging: If messaging architecture needs rebuilding
• rebranding: If the audit reveals the brand needs deeper structural change
• brand-context: Foundation context for all brand work