name: core-human-truth
description: Use when the user asks for a core human truth, brand truth, audience insight, consumer truth, foundational brand insight, or strategic brand research — Layer 1 of the Brandprint research stack and the entry point for any new brand engagement. Also trigger when requests mention "tension ladder," "truth sentence," "brand truth scaffolding," "audience truth," "what does my audience really believe," or any request to distill a brand or product down to one universal human insight. Even if the user just says "find the real truth behind why people buy X" or "what's the one thing my audience feels but can't say," use this skill.
Core Human Truth — Deep Research Directive
Produce a single validated sentence (max 25 words) that captures the Core Human Truth for a given topic and audience. The sentence must pass tension, emotion, and agency checks, and be backed by triangulated evidence.
When NOT to Use
- Quick taglines or copywriting. This skill runs a six-phase research pipeline. If the user wants a headline without evidence, write the copy directly — don't invoke this.
- A validated truth already exists. If the brand has a researched, evidence-backed truth sentence, skip to
brandprint-tier-a and feed it in as the seed.
- Non-brand research questions. Market sizing, technology comparisons, or general analysis belong in
deep-research — this skill only distills brand/audience truths.
When You Receive a Request
Before doing anything else, resolve these variables with the user. If any are missing, ask.
| Variable | What to Capture | Default |
|---|
topic | The brand, product, service, or subject | required |
audience | Primary audience definition | required |
region_context | Geography or cultural context | US / English-speaking |
constraints | Scope limits, legal, or brand constraints | None |
mode | rapid, standard, or enterprise | standard |
Principles
These are non-negotiable throughout the entire process:
- Truth over consensus. Cite, compare, and challenge sources.
- Show tension, emotion, and agency in the final sentence.
- No jargon. Max 25 words. Instantly understood by the audience.
- Never fabricate data, quotes, or attributions. If unknown, mark unknown.
- Triangulate. Prefer converging evidence across independent sources.
- Be explicit about uncertainty and counter-evidence.
- Respect privacy. Use only public, lawful sources.
Reasoning Approach
Throughout every phase:
- Surface assumptions before starting. List them.
- Voice counter-arguments and plausible alternatives.
- Stress-test conclusions with red team checks.
- Reframe if a simpler or more powerful truth emerges.
- Keep internal working notes distinct from final deliverables.
Workflow — Six Phases
Execute these phases in order. Each phase has a clear goal, actions, and outputs.
Phase 0 — Orientation
Goal: Define the lens and success criteria before research begins.
Actions:
- Resolve all variables (topic, audience, region, constraints, mode)
- List explicit assumptions and open questions
- Define success criteria: max 25 words, no jargon, tension + emotion + agency, testable via proxy validation
- Set evidence thresholds and note any disallowed sources
Outputs: lens_brief, success_criteria, assumptions_list
Phase 1 — Secondary Sourcing
Goal: Map existing knowledge and tensions.
Actions:
- Literature sweep across academic and industry sources for the topic and audience
- Trend and media scan across reputable news, trade publications, forums, and short-form platforms
- Data dig of longitudinal datasets where applicable
- Tag emergent tensions and paradoxes — build a first-pass thematic map
Outputs: annotated_bibliography, thematic_map, data_summary
Mode adjustments:
- Rapid: 8–12 qualitative artifacts, lighter desk research
- Standard: Full desk research, qualitative synthesis
- Enterprise: Add cross-market comparisons, deeper comparative datasets
Phase 2 — Qualitative Synthesis
Goal: Extract lived tensions from public qualitative artifacts.
Actions:
- Identify and summarize public first-person accounts, interviews, reviews, and forums relevant to the audience and topic
- Harvest cultural artifacts that symbolize the topic (memes, community posts) where public and permissible
- Cluster quotes and artifacts into a tension ladder — from surface complaints to root causes
Outputs: insight_memos, tension_ladder, verbatim_snippets_public
Phase 3 — Validation via Triangulation
Goal: Validate candidate sentences with existing evidence and proxy signals.
Actions:
- Draft 3–5 candidate sentences based on the tension ladder
- Score each candidate against success criteria and evidence strength
- Triangulate with existing surveys, meta-analyses, and credible datasets
- If appropriate in Standard or Enterprise mode, design a small survey instrument as a plan only — never fabricate results
Outputs: candidate_sentences_scored, validation_notes, quant_plan_optional
Phase 4 — Extraction and Red Team
Goal: Select the strongest sentence and pressure-test it.
Actions:
- Select the top candidate or create a hybrid based on evidence and clarity
- Run red team critique: Who would disagree and why? What would falsify it? Where does it fail?
- Revise with minimal words to increase truth density
- Run the plain-language and 25-word checks
Outputs: final_sentence, red_team_report, readability_check
Phase 5 — Packaging
Goal: Deliver the sentence and its proof in compact, reusable form.
Actions:
- Assemble rationale narrative connecting tensions to evidence
- Create a simple tension map of paradox axes
- Draft audience archetype snapshots grounded in cited evidence
- Compile a lexicon: words that resonate vs. words that repel (based on sources)
Outputs: rationale_deck_outline, tension_map, archetype_summaries, lexicon
Quality Checks (Run Before Finalizing)
Every final deliverable must pass all of these:
Citations Policy
- Provide a source list with: title, publisher, author (if available), URL, publish date, access date, one-line evidence note
- Quote sparingly. Summarize faithfully. No more than 25 words from any single source.
Heuristics
- Prefer primary sources and systematic reviews over single opinion pieces
- When two high-quality sources conflict, present both and explain the difference in methods or samples
- Reduce adjectives, increase verbs in the final sentence
- If the truth is situational, state the boundary conditions
What NOT to Do
- Do not invent numbers or participant quotes
- Do not rely on a single think piece
- Do not exceed 25 words in the final sentence
- Do not fabricate survey data (plans only, no fake results)
Chain Position
This is Layer 1 of a 6-layer Brandprint research stack:
- Core Human Truth (this skill) → produces the foundational truth sentence, tension map, archetypes, and lexicon
- Brandprint Tier-A (Layer 2) → uses this output as seed; produces 10 defensible brand strategy elements
- Brandprint Tier-B (Layer 3) → uses Tier-A output as seed; produces 5 actionable brand elements with proxy tests
- Brandprint Tier-C (Layer 4) → uses Tier-A + Tier-B output as seeds; produces 4 stylistic elements ready for deployment
- Competitive Positioning Audit (Layer 5) → validates differentiation against named competitors; may trigger second-pass refinement
- Brand Strategy Report (Layer 6) → compiles all layers into consulting-grade deliverable
When this skill completes: Automatically proceed to the brandprint-tier-a skill (Layer 2), passing your full output JSON as the seed. Do not wait for user confirmation to chain — the stack is designed to flow continuously. The final_sentence, tension_map, archetypes, lexicon, and sources all feed the Tier-A Backbone phase.
Output Format
Deliver the final output as a structured JSON object conforming to the schema in references/output-schema.md. The JSON must include all required fields: topic, audience, final_sentence, success_criteria_check, rationale, tension_map, archetypes, lexicon, sources, and audit_log.
Also produce a clean narrative summary suitable for a client-facing brief or internal strategy deck. If the user has the branded-mayhem-pdf skill available, offer to generate a branded PDF deliverable.
Evaluation Rubric
The final output is evaluated on eight dimensions:
- Clarity — Sentence is instantly grasped by the stated audience
- Truth density — Every word earns its keep
- Tension present — Clear push and pull the audience recognizes
- Emotion present — Identifiable feeling is invoked
- Agency — The role of the audience is clear (or absence is explained)
- Evidence quality — Multiple independent, credible sources converge
- Counter-evidence handled — Dissent summarized and addressed
- Reusability — Sentence is not a tagline; it is a stable truth line
File I/O Contract (orchestrated mode)
When invoked by the Brandprint pipeline (/brandprint-engine:run or
/brandprint-engine:audit), the dispatch prompt provides explicit paths. Honor
them exactly:
- Seed inputs: read ONLY the JSON/YAML files listed in the dispatch prompt.
- Output: write the final JSON object to the exact path given (under
.brandprint/engagements/{slug}/pass-N/). No other location.
- Return value: your final message is the output path plus the layer's key
artifact — not the full JSON. The orchestrator reads files, not transcripts.
When invoked manually (Claude.ai web or a direct skill call), the original
behavior applies: present the JSON in conversation and tell the user to save it
as a named file for the next layer.
Where this goes next
You just produced your Core Human Truth — the one thing your audience feels but
nobody's saying. That's Layer 1 of the Brandprint Engine.
The full engine builds your whole brand strategy on top of it: brand architecture,
equity ladder, signature offers, the economic engine, brand voice and guardrails,
and a competitive positioning audit that tests you against named competitors — then
compiles the 30+ page Brand Strategy & Competitive Positioning Report.
→ Get the full engine: Brandprint Engine — https://brandedmayhem.com/products/brandprint-engine
→ Or get all six plugins: the Full Mayhem Stack — https://brandedmayhem.com/products/full-mayhem-stack