Decision-making framework based on Nicholas Carlini's research methodology. Evaluate and rank ideas, projects, and priorities across 10 dimensions: impact, uniqueness, comparative advantage, knowledge, de-risking, collaboration, timing, focus, communication, and kill/persist.

A Claude Code skill that turns Nicholas Carlini's research decision-making methodology into a structured framework you can invoke anytime you need to decide what to work on.
Bring one idea or ten. The framework scores each across ten dimensions, eliminates the losers, deep-dives the survivors, and delivers a ranked recommendation with concrete next actions.
Works for research, startups, engineering, product decisions, and general prioritization.
You invoke /carlini-dm and describe what you're deciding — a single idea, a list of competing options, or an active project you're not sure about.
For multiple options: Claude scores each option across all 10 dimensions in a quick elimination round, cuts the bottom half, then deep-dives the top 2-3 survivors before delivering a ranked recommendation.
For a single idea or active project: Claude walks through each dimension one at a time and delivers a verdict: Continue, Kill, Pivot, De-risk first, or Practice (craft work).
Either way, you get a direct recommendation and one concrete next action per option.
| # | Dimension | What it filters |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | Impact | Does it matter if this succeeds? |
| 2 | Uniqueness | Can only you do this, right now? |
| 3 | Comparative Advantage | Does this play to your specific strengths? |
| 4 | Knowledge & Independence | Do you understand the landscape AND think independently? |
| 5 | De-risking | Have you tested the hard part first? |
| 6 | Collaboration Leverage | Do you have the right team? |
| 7 | Timing | Is the window open? |
| 8 | Focus | Can you state this in one sentence? |
| 9 | Communication Potential | Can this be explained compellingly? |
| 10 | Kill / Persist | Should you stop, continue, or double down? |
"One excellent paper is worth a thousand mediocre ones, and takes less time to write." — Carlini
/plugin marketplace add moralespanitz/carlini-dm
/plugin install carlini-dm@carlini-dm
git clone https://github.com/moralespanitz/carlini-dm
ln -s $(pwd)/carlini-dm/.claude/skills/carlini-dm ~/.claude/skills/carlini-dm
/carlini-dm
Then describe what you're deciding. Examples:
Adapted from Nicholas Carlini's article:
How to win a best paper award (or, an opinionated take on how to do important research that matters) — 2026-03-09
The article covers coming up with good research ideas, executing them well, writing them up clearly, and navigating what happens afterwards. This skill distills the decision-making principles from all four sections into a scoring framework that works beyond academic research.
Nicholas Carlini is a researcher at the intersection of machine learning and computer security, currently at Anthropic. Previously a research scientist at Google Brain (2018–2023) and DeepMind (2023–2025). Ph.D. from UC Berkeley under David Wagner.
His papers have received best paper awards at IEEE S&P, USENIX Security (twice), and ICML (three times), and have been covered by the New York Times, the BBC, Nature, Science, Wired, and Popular Science.
More at nicholas.carlini.com.
MIT
Own this plugin?
Verify ownership to unlock analytics, metadata editing, and a verified badge. GitHub access is read-only (username + org membership).
Sign in to claimOwn this plugin?
Verify ownership to unlock analytics, metadata editing, and a verified badge. GitHub access is read-only (username + org membership).
Sign in to claimBased on adoption, maintenance, documentation, and repository signals. Not a security audit or endorsement.
npx claudepluginhub moralespanitz/carlini-dm --plugin carlini-dmResearch Loop — Agent OS for scientific researchers. Auto-triggering skills for deep research, literature review, autonomous experimentation, paper writing, and more.
Strategic research thinking agents — idea evaluation, project triage, and structured brainstorming inspired by Carlini's research methodology
A decision operating system for high-stakes choices. Simulates disagreement across 5 independent personas, stress-tests assumptions, and converges on what actually holds up.
Truth-seeking sparring partner for Claude Code. Challenges claims, decisions, and documents through structured dialectical analysis.
Structured thinking methods that counteract LLM reasoning biases during problem exploration — first principles, inversion, constraint manipulation, perspective forcing, analogy search, and more, with user-gated parallel subagent exploration for deep dives
A deterministic thinking partner that challenges assumptions and applies 150+ mental models to sharpen decisions, solve problems, and think more clearly. Features orientation detection, cognitive operations framework, and structured diagnostic workflows.
A structured toolkit of thinking skills for Claude Code — covering logic, ethics, creativity, decision-making, systems thinking, communication, and more. Each skill is an invokable command that applies a specific reasoning framework to any situation.