Stats
Actions
Tags
From dm-team
Run collaborative team-based code review where reviewers discuss and challenge each other's findings
How this command is triggered — by the user, by Claude, or both
Slash command
/dm-team:review --pr <number>, --commits <range>, --only <acs>, --min-severity <level>, --skip-beadsThe summary Claude sees in its command listing — used to decide when to auto-load this command
# /review Run collaborative team-based code review where reviewers discuss and challenge each other's findings. Arguments: $ARGUMENTS ## Command behavior 1. **Scope detection**: Same as dm-work:review Phase 1 (PR mode, review tags, feature branch, explicit commits). 2. **Scout**: Same as dm-work:review Phase 2 — haiku Explore subagent for fast categorization. 3. **Create review team**: Spawn Agent Team with reviewers based on --only filter (default: all three). Include in spawn prompts: - Commit range and changed files (scoped to their domain) - Scout findings (project type, pat...
Run collaborative team-based code review where reviewers discuss and challenge each other's findings.
Arguments: $ARGUMENTS
Scope detection: Same as dm-work:review Phase 1 (PR mode, review tags, feature branch, explicit commits).
Scout: Same as dm-work:review Phase 2 — haiku Explore subagent for fast categorization.
Create review team: Spawn Agent Team with reviewers based on --only filter (default: all three). Include in spawn prompts:
Monitor debate: Lead watches for:
Synthesize: Merge findings, resolve conflicts, produce unified assessment.
Output: Same as dm-work:review Phase 5 (local mode with beads, or PR mode with GitHub comments), plus Review Discussion Notes section.
Tag checkpoint: Move review tag to HEAD (same as dm-work:review).
Cleanup team.
npx claudepluginhub rbergman/dark-matter-marketplace --plugin dm-team/team-reviewOrchestrates a multi-reviewer parallel code review with specialized dimensions (security, performance, architecture, testing, accessibility). Accepts files, directories, git diffs, or PR numbers, and produces a consolidated, severity-organized report.
/devteam-reviewOrchestrates coordinated code reviews using language-specific and domain-specific reviewers on files, scopes, or PRs. Produces unified report with severity ratings, findings summary, and recommendations.
/reviewLaunches a lightweight Review Team to audit current changes with a two-stage review (spec compliance + code quality). Accepts optional file path or commit range; defaults to git diff.
/reviewRuns AI-powered multi-agent code review on staged changes, branches, commits, files, or directories. Supports --fresh reset, custom --team composition, and ad-hoc --reviewer personas. Stores results in .ocr/sessions/.
/review-prReviews pull requests using 6-7 parallel specialized agents for code quality, security, tests, frontend, backend, and performance. Supports full, focused, or quick modes.
/reviewReviews staged changes or recent commits across five axes—correctness, readability, architecture, security, performance—producing categorized findings with file:line references and fixes.