review-pr

PR Review

Review pull request changes with senior Java developer standards.

Supports two modes:

1. GitHub PR Mode: PR number (e.g., 123 or #123) → uses gh pr view + gh pr diff
2. Branch Comparison Mode: branch name or empty → uses git diff

Parameter Usage

/review-pr 123           # GitHub PR #123
/review-pr               # Current branch vs master
/review-pr feature-auth  # feature-auth vs master
/review-pr feature-auth develop  # feature-auth vs develop

Auto-detection: Pure number → GitHub PR mode. Anything else → branch comparison mode.

Workflow

Step 1: Gather Information

GitHub PR mode: Use gh pr view <PR_NUMBER> --json number,title,body,state,author,baseRefName,headRefName,additions,deletions,changedFiles,commits and gh pr diff <PR_NUMBER>.

Branch comparison mode: Use git diff <base>..<compare> --name-status, git diff --stat, git log --oneline --no-merges, and git diff for full diff.

Step 2: Categorize Changed Files

From git diff --name-status: Added (A), Modified (M), Deleted (D), Renamed (R).

Focus on .java files. Mention other types (.yml, .properties) briefly.

Step 3: Code Quality Review

Apply the same standards as /code-review skill:

• Naming and Readability
• Method Design
• Avoiding Over-design
• Exception Handling
• Spring Boot Best Practices
• Performance Considerations

Focus on the changed lines, not the entire file.

Step 4: PR-Specific Checks (Key Differentiator from Code Review)

Test Coverage

• New features: corresponding test files?
• Bug fixes: regression test added?
• OrderService.java changed → OrderServiceTest.java should be updated

Breaking Changes

• Removed public methods or changed method signatures
• Renamed fields in DTOs/entities
• Changed API endpoints or request/response formats

Unrelated Changes

• Files that don't belong in this PR
• Accidental formatting changes in unrelated files

Debug/TODO Code

Check for leftover System.out.println, TODO, FIXME:

git diff <base>..<compare> | grep -E "System.out.println|TODO|FIXME|XXX"

Documentation

• Public API changes → docs updated?
• New dependencies → explained?

Output Format

IMPORTANT: All output must be in Traditional Chinese (繁體中文)

# PR Review 報告

## 變更概覽
- **PR 資訊** (gh mode): 編號、標題、作者、狀態、base/head branch
- **變更統計**: 檔案數量、+新增行、-刪除行、主要變更類型

## Commit 歷史分析
- Commit 數量和品質評估

## 程式碼品質評估
- 複雜度、可維護性、Over-design 程度

## 變更檔案詳細審查

### Priority 1 - 必須修正
| 問題 | 位置 | 影響 | 修正方式 |

### Priority 2 - 建議改進
| 問題 | 位置 | 影響 | 修正方式 |

## PR 特定檢查
- 測試覆蓋 / 文件更新 / Breaking Changes / Debug Code

## 總結評估
**整體評價**: 優秀 / 良好 / 需改進 / 不建議合併
**建議合併時機**: [條件]

When to Apply

• PR 變更審查（GitHub PR 或 branch 比較）
• 合併前的品質把關
• 跨檔案變更的影響分析

Gotchas

• 大型 PR diff 可能被截斷：gh pr diff 對 500+ 行的 PR 可能不完整，超過時應逐檔案 gh api 讀取
• rename detection 閾值 50%：重構性 rename 可能被 git diff 當成 delete+add，要用 --find-renames 確認
• test 檔案也要審查品質：不只看「有沒有 test」，要看 test 是否有意義（真實場景、正確 assertion）
• CI 全過不代表程式碼品質好：CI 只檢查編譯和測試，不檢查設計和架構問題
• 不要只看 diff：對於關鍵修改，務必讀完整的 method/class 上下文才能判斷影響