From xe-writing
Rewrite prose so it reads like one real person actually said it. Use when text feels constructed, overcorrected, evenly paced, or generically "well-written" in the way AI output tends to be. Strips rehearsed phrasing, breaks rhythmic patterns, and restores a clear point of view.
How this skill is triggered — by the user, by Claude, or both
Slash command
/xe-writing:sound-like-a-personThe summary Claude sees in its skill listing — used to decide when to auto-load this skill
Make writing read like it came from someone who lived it, not someone
Make writing read like it came from someone who lived it, not someone performing competence. The target is prose a real person would say out loud without second-guessing every word.
This skill complements stop-slop (which removes specific AI tells) by
focusing on the felt quality of voice — pacing, conviction, the small
unevenness that signals a human was here.
Run these in order. Each pass has one job. Don't try to do all six at once — you'll dilute every one.
Read it as someone who actually lived the thing being described. Cut anything that feels rehearsed, overbuilt, or written to sound impressive. A person recounting an experience is a little rougher and more direct than a person constructing an essay.
Ask: Would someone actually say this, or only write it?
This is not a grammar pass. It's a thinking pass. Real minds move unevenly — punchy in places, slower in others, occasionally circling back. If the prose moves at one steady tempo, break the pattern. Shorten a sentence that's pacing itself. Let one breathe longer than expected.
Ask: Does this read like a mind working, or like a metronome?
Spot the tells: tricolons, balanced contrasts, em-dash reveals, paragraphs that all open the same way, sentences that all resolve neatly. Strip them one by one. Vary structure. Soften phrasings that feel templated. Each word should feel chosen in the moment, not generated by a pattern.
Ask: Would removing this sentence's twin make the piece feel more honest?
A real person has a point of view. They prefer some things over others. They're allowed small contradictions. The piece should belong to one person, not read like a neutral observer trying to please everyone. Let opinions through. Let tone shift naturally when the subject does.
Ask: Whose writing is this? Could you pick it out of a lineup?
Read it as a stranger encountering it for the first time. Cut anything flat, calculated, or forgettable — even if it's technically correct. Keep what matters. The test isn't "is this fine"; it's "does this land?" Writing that nobody would notice missing should be missing.
Ask: If a reader stopped here, would they remember why they kept reading?
Read it as someone who immediately distrusts writing that sounds too clean. Go sentence by sentence. Anything that feels constructed, overcorrected, or too precisely worded — rewrite it the way a real person would say it out loud, without hedging or polishing.
Ask: Does this sound like a person, or like a person trying to sound like a person?
Markers of human-feeling prose:
Creates, edits, and optimizes skills for Claude Code, including drafting, evaluating with test prompts, iterating on performance, and improving skill descriptions for better triggering accuracy.
npx claudepluginhub xe/agent-plugins --plugin xe-writing