Guides selection of AI coding tools like Claude Code, Lovable, Replit, or Cursor; provides prompting strategies, iterative workflows, and build loops for generating and refining features.
How this skill is triggered — by the user, by Claude, or both
Slash command
/solo-founder-superpowers:buildThe summary Claude sees in its skill listing — used to decide when to auto-load this skill
**Starting from scratch?** → Lovable (fastest MVP)
Starting from scratch? → Lovable (fastest MVP)
Existing codebase? → Claude Code (best context)
Learning to code? → Replit (educational)
Already code? → Cursor (power features)
See TOOLS.md for detailed comparison.
- [ ] Start with spec (use scope skill)
- [ ] Give spec to AI tool
- [ ] Test happy path + edge cases
- [ ] Give specific feedback on issues
- [ ] Iterate (expect 2-4 rounds)
- [ ] Deploy when working
Build this feature: [paste spec]
Codebase: React + TypeScript + Tailwind
Reference: src/components/Button.tsx for button patterns
Build: [paste simplified spec focusing on outcome]
Make it look like Linear (minimal, clean)
Create: [paste spec emphasizing what user sees]
Use React. Keep simple.
See PROMPTS.md for patterns.
The biggest mistake non-technical founders make: giving AI the entire spec and hoping it comes back perfect. It won't. AI tools work best in focused chunks.
The Build Loop:
1. Pick ONE piece (a single feature or flow)
2. Give AI a clear spec for just that piece
3. Test it — does the piece work?
4. Fix any issues before moving on
5. Pick the next piece → repeat
Good pieces (1-3 hours each):
Bad pieces (too big):
Before building the next feature, check: Does the previous feature still work? Can you sign up, do the core action, and see the result? AI tools sometimes break existing features while adding new ones. Catch that early.
Start a new chat/session with your AI tool when:
When starting fresh, give AI a clear description of: what exists, what works, and what you need next. Don't assume it remembers.
AI-built projects routinely ship without these. Add them explicitly:
Ask Your AI Tool to Add:
- [ ] Error tracking (Sentry) — so you know when things break
- [ ] Analytics snippet (Plausible, PostHog, or GA4) — so you know who visits
- [ ] Proper 404 page — so broken links don't show a blank screen
- [ ] Proper 500 page — so server errors show a helpful message
- [ ] Favicon — so your browser tab has an icon, not a blank square
- [ ] Meta tags (title, description, OG image) — so links look good when shared
- [ ] Loading states — so users know something is happening
Test, don't just run:
- [ ] Looks right?
- [ ] Happy path works?
- [ ] Edge cases work?
- [ ] Works on mobile?
- [ ] Error messages clear?
Bad: "This doesn't work"
Good: "Clicking 'Save' does nothing. Expected: 'Saved!' message"
Template:
What I tried: [action]
Expected: [outcome]
Got: [what happened]
Normal: 2-4 rounds per feature
First build: AI builds from spec, you find 3-5 issues
Second build: Fixes those, you find 1-2 more
Third build: Final polish
Stop when:
Don't iterate for:
| Mistake | Fix |
|---|---|
| No spec | Use scope skill first |
| "Build a dashboard" | Specify what's on it |
| Skip edge case testing | Try breaking it |
| Accept without review | Always test |
| Add features mid-build | Finish current feature first |
| Fix code yourself | Describe problem, let AI fix |
Too big: "Build entire app"
Too small: "Add one button"
Right: "Build user auth flow" (1-3 hours)
Good chunks:
AI keeps breaking things: → Break into smaller piece, start fresh session
Can't figure out complex feature: → Ask: "What's simplest way?" Accept simpler solution
Each fix breaks something else: → Stop. Ask: "Better approach?" Consider starting over
Add [feature] to existing project.
Stack: [React, Next.js, etc]
Patterns: Check src/components for examples
Style: Tailwind + custom design system
Follow existing code style
Reference existing:
Build Settings page.
Reference Dashboard page layout.
Use same Card/Button components.
Provide examples:
Pricing page with 3 tiers.
Like Linear's pricing - clean, minimal.
Specify constraints:
Build profile page.
Must work offline.
Load under 2 seconds.
WCAG AA accessible.
See PROMPTS.md for more.
Check:
Don't check:
AI handles code quality. You handle requirements.
✅ Features match specs
✅ 2-4 iterations (not 10+)
✅ Can explain what's wrong
✅ Building faster each week
npx claudepluginhub whawkinsiv/solo-founder-superpowers --plugin solo-founder-superpowersUse this skill when the user asks to "vibe code this", "build this with AI", "help me use Cursor/v0/Bolt to build this", "vibe coding from my PRD", "how do I code this with AI", "turn this spec into code", or wants guidance on using AI coding tools (Cursor, GitHub Copilot, v0, Bolt, Lovable, Claude Artifacts) to prototype or build a feature from a product spec. This is a coaching skill — it helps the PM get the most out of AI coding tools, not write code directly.
Refines vague Claude Code prompts into structured, project-context-aware instructions by scanning package.json, CLAUDE.md, imports, and directory structure.
Generates structured, optimized prompts for Replit Agent from user requirements to build projects accurately with minimal iterations.