Writes structured Twitter/X threads from media stories, editorial arguments, or behind-the-scenes insights with hooks, logical progression, and response-inviting closes.
How this skill is triggered — by the user, by Claude, or both
Slash command
/autopunk-media-skills:thread-writerThe summary Claude sees in its skill listing — used to decide when to auto-load this skill
Writes a structured Twitter/X thread expanding on a media story, documentary subject, editorial argument, or behind-the-scenes insight — with a strong opening tweet, logical progression, and a close that invites response.
Writes a structured Twitter/X thread expanding on a media story, documentary subject, editorial argument, or behind-the-scenes insight — with a strong opening tweet, logical progression, and a close that invites response.
Required: The subject or story you want to thread (a brief description or the key points), the main argument or insight you want to leave the reader with, the intended length (short: 4–6 tweets; medium: 8–12 tweets; long: 12–20 tweets).
Optional: Your voice and register (journalist, filmmaker, critic, investigative reporter, personal essayist), whether the thread promotes or expands on a specific piece of content (article, film, podcast episode), the specific audience you are writing for.
Numbered tweet list. Each tweet: 220–280 characters (within the Twitter/X limit). Total thread length specified by user (default: 8–10 tweets). Each tweet is usable independently if needed. Thread header (tweet 1) clearly marked as the lead. A separate one-paragraph summary of the thread's core argument is provided for reference. No tweet uses all-caps except for emphasis on a single word. Output ends with a "Next Step" note: verify character counts in the composer, schedule the post, and run caption-writer to repurpose the thread content for Instagram or LinkedIn.
Subject: A documentary I've been making for two years about climate grief counsellors — people who work professionally with individuals experiencing psychological distress caused by climate change. The film has just been accepted at IDFA. Main argument/insight: Climate grief is real and is being treated by professionals, but most people have never heard of the field — and the counsellors themselves are experiencing the same grief they are treating. Length: Medium (10 tweets) Voice: Filmmaker — personal, direct, not academic
Thread summary: A documentary filmmaker describes two years of filming climate grief counsellors — professionals who treat psychological distress caused by climate change — revealing that the counsellors are experiencing the same grief they are treating.
1/ I've spent two years filming climate grief counsellors.
Most people have never heard of them. They're trained therapists and psychologists who specialise in treating the specific psychological distress that comes from watching the world change in ways that can't be undone.
The field is growing fast.
2/ When I started, I thought I was making a film about a niche specialty — a curiosity at the edge of the mental health profession.
I was wrong. The waiting lists at every practice I visited were six weeks or longer.
3/ "Climate grief" sounds abstract. It isn't.
It's the person who can't sleep because they can't stop thinking about what the world will look like when their children are 40. It's the farmer who watched the crop fail for the third year running. It's the scientist who knows the data better than anyone.
4/ The counsellors I filmed don't use the word "grief" the way it's used in bereavement work.
They call it anticipatory grief. You're mourning something that hasn't fully happened yet — but that you know is coming.
That's a specific and difficult thing to treat.
5/ Here's what I didn't expect.
The counsellors are experiencing the same thing.
Every single one I spoke to described a version of their own climate grief. They're treating it in their clients. They're also living with it.
6/ One of the people in the film — a psychologist with 25 years of practice — told me: "I became specialised in this because I needed it myself. I couldn't find someone who could help me, so I became that person."
That sentence is in the film. I couldn't have written it.
7/ There's a supervision culture growing inside the field. Counsellors seeing other counsellors. Support groups for people who spend their working days inside other people's climate anxiety.
A profession processing its own version of the thing it treats.
8/ The film doesn't answer whether climate grief is a crisis or a reasonable response to a situation that is genuinely alarming.
I think both are true. I think the counsellors think both are true.
9/ THE WEIGHT OF WHAT WE KNOW will premiere at IDFA in November.
If you work in mental health, climate communication, documentary, or if this is just something you think about — I'd be glad if you watched it.
[Link to announcement]
10/ I'll be sharing more from the making of this film over the next few months.
One question I'm still sitting with: at what point does a profession specialising in treating distress start to change the way we collectively process the thing causing it?
I don't know yet.
npx claudepluginhub ur-grue/autopunk-media-skills --plugin autopunk-media-skillsCreates multi-tweet Twitter/X threads with hook formulas, narrative arcs, engagement tactics, and CTA placement. Use for viral threads or insight sharing.
Guides users in writing X/Twitter threads for affiliate marketing that provide value and drive clicks without feeling like ads.
Writes a single, publication-ready X/Twitter post (≤280 characters) in a clear journalistic voice. Use when you need editorial-style social copy for a news story, investigation, or article link.