Reformats manuscripts, articles, or long-form text to match a specific publication's structural and style requirements — adjusting headings, spacing, citations, pull-quotes, and front matter.
How this skill is triggered — by the user, by Claude, or both
Slash command
/autopunk-media-skills:manuscript-formatterThe summary Claude sees in its skill listing — used to decide when to auto-load this skill
Reformats a manuscript, article, or long-form text to match a specific publication's structural and style requirements — adjusting headings, paragraph spacing, citation format, pull-quote placement, and front matter without altering the content itself.
Reformats a manuscript, article, or long-form text to match a specific publication's structural and style requirements — adjusting headings, paragraph spacing, citation format, pull-quote placement, and front matter without altering the content itself.
Required: The full text to reformat; the target format or style guide (e.g., "AP style feature," "Chicago Manual academic article," "standard magazine submission format," or a specific publication's submission guidelines).
Optional: The publication's specific formatting requirements if they differ from a standard style guide (paragraph indent vs. block paragraphs, heading hierarchy, footnote vs. endnote, citation style); whether to add or restructure subheadings; word count target (if the reformatted version must fit a specific length); front matter requirements (author name, date, word count header, abstract, keywords); any elements that must be preserved exactly as-is (e.g., specific formatting of data tables or block quotes).
Reads the full text and identifies its current structure. Maps the existing formatting: heading levels, paragraph style, citation format, block quote treatment, list formatting, and any front matter. Identifies what needs to change to match the target format and what can remain as-is.
Applies the target format's structural rules. Adjusts heading hierarchy (H1/H2/H3), paragraph spacing and indentation, block quote formatting, list style (bulleted vs. numbered), and section break conventions. For academic-to-journalistic conversions, removes abstracts and reorganizes front matter; for journalistic-to-academic, adds structured sections and formal citation format.
Reformats citations and attributions. Converts between citation styles (APA, Chicago, MLA, AP) as needed. In-text citations, footnotes, endnotes, and bibliography entries are reformatted to match the target standard. If the source text uses informal attributions ("according to a recent study"), the assistant retains them as-is for journalistic formats or formalizes them for academic formats.
Adds or adjusts front matter. Generates a properly formatted header block including: title, author name, date, word count, abstract (if required), and any other fields specified in the target format. If the source text lacks a required front matter element (e.g., an abstract for an academic submission), the assistant drafts one from the article's content and flags it for review.
Preserves the content unchanged. This is a formatting skill, not an editing skill. The text's meaning, arguments, quotes, and data are not altered. Any unavoidable content changes (e.g., converting an informal subheading to a formal one) are flagged in the formatting notes.
The complete reformatted text, ready for submission or editorial review. Front matter appears first (if applicable), followed by the body text in the target format. After the reformatted text, a "Formatting Notes" section (3–6 bullet points) listing the significant structural changes made, any elements that could not be reformatted automatically (e.g., images, tables), and any content that was drafted or modified (flagged for review). The output preserves the original word count within 2% — formatting changes should not significantly alter length.
Target format: Standard magazine submission (double-spaced, block paragraphs, AP style attributions, no footnotes, word count in header)
Current format: Academic-style draft with footnotes, APA in-text citations, and an abstract
Text:
Abstract: This article examines the economic impact of community-owned renewable energy projects in rural regions, drawing on case studies from three European countries. It argues that local ownership models generate measurably higher community reinvestment than corporate-owned installations.
1. Introduction
The expansion of renewable energy capacity in rural areas has accelerated significantly over the past decade (European Renewable Energy Council, 2024). However, the economic benefits of these installations do not always accrue to the communities that host them. A growing body of research suggests that ownership structure — specifically whether a project is community-owned or corporate-owned — is the decisive factor in determining local economic impact (Hansen & Nordberg, 2023; Oliveira et al., 2024).
This article presents findings from a comparative analysis of 14 renewable energy installations across three countries.^1
^1 The study was conducted between January 2024 and June 2025 and included site visits, financial audits, and interviews with 42 community stakeholders.
COMMUNITY ENERGY: WHO REALLY BENEFITS FROM RURAL RENEWABLES? By [Author Name] Word count: [X,XXX]
The expansion of renewable energy capacity in rural areas has accelerated significantly over the past decade. But the economic benefits of these installations do not always reach the communities that host them. A growing body of research suggests that ownership structure — specifically whether a project is community-owned or corporate-owned — is the decisive factor in determining local economic impact.
This article presents findings from a comparative analysis of 14 renewable energy installations across three countries. The study, conducted between January 2024 and June 2025, included site visits, financial audits, and interviews with 42 community stakeholders.
Formatting Notes
npx claudepluginhub ur-grue/autopunk-media-skills --plugin autopunk-media-skillsApplies AP, Chicago, or custom house style to a manuscript, correcting capitalization, punctuation, numbers, abbreviations, and usage inconsistencies with a detailed change log.
Reviews copy line-by-line against Every's style guide for grammar, punctuation, mechanics, formatting, and consistency in articles or docs.
Structurally edits article drafts through an interactive section-by-section rewrite for clarity, flow, and argument strength.