Writes precise publication-standard corrections notices for data errors in articles, stating the error, correct figure, and impact on story conclusions.
How this skill is triggered — by the user, by Claude, or both
Slash command
/autopunk-media-skills:data-corrections-writerThe summary Claude sees in its skill listing — used to decide when to auto-load this skill
Writes a precise, publication-standard corrections notice for a data error published in an article — stating clearly what was wrong, what the correct figure is, and how the error affected the reported story.
Writes a precise, publication-standard corrections notice for a data error published in an article — stating clearly what was wrong, what the correct figure is, and how the error affected the reported story.
Required: The original published figure (as it appeared in print or online). The correct figure. The article headline or title and publication date. A brief explanation of how the error occurred (if known — this can be "we do not know how this error occurred"). Optional: Whether the error affects the story's main conclusion (yes / no / partially); whether a related chart, table, or infographic also needs correction; the publication's standard corrections format or style.
A corrections notice of two to five sentences. Standard structure: (1) The article title and date, (2) what was wrong and where it appeared, (3) what the correct figure is, (4) whether the error affects the article's conclusions. Optionally: a note on what caused the error if this is known and disclosable. Tone: direct, factual, no hedging. Plain language.
Original published figure: "North Coastal Authority had a year-on-year increase in orthopaedic waiting times of 32%" Correct figure: 22% Article: "Waiting time crisis: the regions left behind" published 14 March 2026 Where in article: Second paragraph and repeated in chart caption How error occurred: A data processing error in the original spreadsheet transposed two digits in the percentage change column Does it affect the conclusion? No — the finding that North Coastal had the highest rate of increase among all authorities remains correct even with the corrected figure
Correction
In our article "Waiting time crisis: the regions left behind" (14 March 2026), we stated that North Coastal Authority recorded a year-on-year increase in orthopaedic waiting times of 32%. The correct figure is 22%. This error appeared in the second paragraph of the article and in the caption of the accompanying chart; both have been updated. The error resulted from a data processing mistake in which two digits in the percentage change calculation were transposed. The correction does not affect the article's central finding: North Coastal Authority recorded the highest rate of increase among all 47 health authorities analysed, and that finding holds with the corrected figure.
Corrected: 16 March 2026
npx claudepluginhub ur-grue/autopunk-media-skills --plugin autopunk-media-skillsDrafts a formal, publication-ready correction notice for a previously published article, following journalistic standards for transparency and tone.
Extracts and verifies factual claims from PR copy or journalistic drafts, providing citations and warning on low certainty. Use before sending pitches or press releases.
Drafts a factually accurate news article using inverted pyramid structure and AP style. Includes lede writing, source attribution, quote handling, and self-editing steps.