From t-tools
Evaluates technical design documents for implementability, completeness, and consistency. Outputs a 100-point score with P0/P1/P2 issue list and quality gate pass/fail.
How this skill is triggered — by the user, by Claude, or both
Slash command
/t-tools:t-design-check [方案名称][方案名称]This skill is limited to the following tools:
The summary Claude sees in its skill listing — used to decide when to auto-load this skill
运行时边界统一参考:`${CLAUDE_PLUGIN_ROOT}/protocols/runtime-boundaries.md`
运行时边界统一参考:${CLAUDE_PLUGIN_ROOT}/protocols/runtime-boundaries.md
评分维度、严重级别和报告要求统一参考:${CLAUDE_PLUGIN_ROOT}/protocols/design-check-rubric.md
/t-design-check [方案名称]
| 参数 | 说明 |
|---|---|
[feature] | 方案名称(必填) |
.ai/design/[feature].mddocs/user-stories/**/*.md、docs/prd/**/*.md、.ai/tech-research/**/*.md${CLAUDE_PLUGIN_ROOT}/guides/core/environment-and-testing-guide.md${CLAUDE_PLUGIN_ROOT}/guides/core/quality.md${CLAUDE_PLUGIN_ROOT}/guides/backend/development.md${CLAUDE_PLUGIN_ROOT}/guides/frontend/development.mdAGENTS.md.ai/tech-research/[feature].md 作为唯一需求来源;此时不得因缺少 PRD/用户故事扣 P0,但需要核对技术目标、约束、影响范围和风险是否一致。${CLAUDE_PLUGIN_ROOT}/protocols/design-check-rubric.md 检查 API、数据库、前端与测试策略。.ai/quality/design-check-[feature]-[YYYYMMDD-HHMMSS].md。| 错误码 | 触发条件 | 用户可见提示 | 恢复动作 |
|---|---|---|---|
DESIGN_DOC_MISSING | 设计文档不存在 | 未找到设计文档 | 先运行 /t-design [feature] |
DESIGN_DOC_INVALID | 设计文档缺少标题或主要章节结构 | 设计文档结构不完整 | 按模板补齐章节后重试 |
REQUIREMENT_SOURCE_MISSING | 无法定位任何关联的用户故事、PRD 或技术预研 | 未找到可追溯的需求来源 | 在设计文档中补充引用后重试 |
REPORT_WRITE_FAILED | 质量报告写入失败 | 无法写入检查报告 | 检查 .ai/quality/ 目录权限后重试 |
/t-design-check <feature>
输出:
总分: 91/100 (优秀,可进入后续拆解)
需求追溯性: 19/20 (-1: 缺少一个用户故事来源)
现有实现分析准确性: 15/15
API 设计完整性: 18/20 (-2: 缺少 409 错误响应说明)
数据库设计完整性: 20/20
前端设计完整性: 9/10 (-1: 空态说明不足)
测试与验收策略: 10/10
文档规范与假设显式化: 5/5
P1 问题:
- `4.2 API 接口设计` 缺少冲突场景错误响应说明
修复步骤:
- 在关键写接口下补充 409/422 等业务错误响应
npx claudepluginhub timzaak/web-dev-skillsReviews design and implementation docs from analysis-process for document quality, internal consistency, and technical soundness before implementation-process.
Evaluates design documents using a five-dimensional quality rubric (structure, semantics, business rules, compliance, quality) and outputs evaluation summaries and badcase lists.
Validates design documents before planning. Uses a 9-point checklist to catch specification gaps and assess architecture, test strategy, and handoff quality.