address-pr-review

Address PR Review

Address unresolved PR review comments for pull request $ARGUMENTS.

Process

1. Fetch Unresolved Comments

Parse PR number from $ARGUMENTS (numeric or extract from URL).

Get PR details:

gh pr view [PR_NUMBER] --json number,title,url,headRepositoryOwner,headRepository

Fetch unresolved threads via GraphQL:

gh api graphql -f query='
query {
  repository(owner: "OWNER", name: "REPO") {
    pullRequest(number: PR_NUMBER) {
      reviewThreads(first: 50) {
        nodes {
          isResolved
          comments(first: 10) {
            nodes {
              id
              body
              path
              line
              author {
                login
              }
              createdAt
            }
          }
        }
      }
    }
  }
}' --jq '.data.repository.pullRequest.reviewThreads.nodes[] | select(.isResolved == false) | {isResolved: .isResolved, comment: .comments.nodes[0]}'

2. Launch PR Comment Reviewer Agents

Launch one pr-comment-reviewer agent per unresolved comment. Use Task tool with subagent_type: "pr-comment-reviewer".

Launch all agents in parallel using multiple Task calls in a single message.

Prompt structure:

Review this PR comment and evaluate whether the suggested change should be implemented:

**File**: {path}
**Line**: {line}
**Author**: {author}
**Comment**:
{body}

Provide a critical but reasonable evaluation of:
1. Whether this change is necessary
2. The proposed solution (if any) vs alternatives
3. Your recommendation

3. Generate Report

Consolidate agent responses into a summary:

# PR Review Comment Analysis for PR #{number}

Found {N} unresolved comments.

## Summary

- **Should Fix**: {count} comments
- **Optional**: {count} comments
- **Skip**: {count} comments

---

## Comment 1: {Short description}

**File**: {path}:{line}
**Verdict**: {Should Fix / Optional / Skip}

{Agent's reasoning and recommendation}

---

## Overall Recommendation

{Synthesized recommendation across all comments}

Guidelines

• Only analyze unresolved comments (isResolved == false)
• Launch agents in parallel for speed
• Be critical but reasonable about recommendations
• Consider CLAUDE.md principles when evaluating suggestions
• Consolidate duplicate comments
• Use clear verdicts: Should Fix, Optional, or Skip