From antigravity-awesome-skills
Audits a live web page in five phases to identify mock data, hardcoded values, LLM-generated metrics, and broken endpoints, outputting a markdown report with verdicts per visible value.
How this skill is triggered — by the user, by Claude, or both
Slash command
/antigravity-awesome-skills:mock-hunterThe summary Claude sees in its skill listing — used to decide when to auto-load this skill
MockHunter is a Claude Code skill that audits a live web page and tells you, for every visible value, whether it is real, mocked, LLM-generated, hardcoded, broken, or unknown. It is built for vibe-coded apps (Lovable, Bolt, v0, Replit, AI Studio, Cursor Composer) where the UI may look complete but the data layer often is not. It uses Playwright MCP to drive a real browser, then traces each visi...
MockHunter is a Claude Code skill that audits a live web page and tells you, for every visible value, whether it is real, mocked, LLM-generated, hardcoded, broken, or unknown. It is built for vibe-coded apps (Lovable, Bolt, v0, Replit, AI Studio, Cursor Composer) where the UI may look complete but the data layer often is not. It uses Playwright MCP to drive a real browser, then traces each visible value through the network and DOM to its source.
This skill adapts the upstream CodeShuX/mockhunter project (community source).
Because this workflow drives a real browser against live pages, treat it as an interactive audit tool, not a plugin-safe read-only helper. Default to observation-only until the user confirms the target is theirs, identifies a safe test account or environment, and explicitly approves any click, submit, or authenticated action that can mutate state.
*.lovable.app, *.bolt.new, *.v0.app, *.replit.app, aistudio.google.com, otherwise Custom)browser_navigate to the target URLFor every visible value, run this decision tree:
Did any network request return this value?
├── YES — found in a response:
│ ├── Status 4xx/5xx → BROKEN
│ ├── Endpoint matches /ai|openai|generate|llm|chat → LLM
│ ├── Response shape matches mock library (faker, MSW, mockoon) → MOCK
│ ├── Uniformity flags trigger → MOCK or LLM (review)
│ ├── DB connection provided?
│ │ ├── Run read-only SELECT, value matches DB row → REAL
│ │ └── Value not in DB → MOCK
│ └── No DB → UNKNOWN (best-guess)
└── NO — value not in any network response:
├── String literal in DOM source → HARDCODED
├── Computed from Math.random / Date.now / faker → MOCK
└── Cannot determine → UNKNOWN
Uniformity heuristics flag suspicious data:
Generate mockhunter-report.md with:
User: /mockhunter audit https://my-app.lovable.app/admin
Skill: [Phase 1] Stack detected: Lovable. Auth: skip. DB: no.
[Phase 2] Catalog: 6 stat cards, 4 verification queues, 8 activity items.
[Phase 3] Search box: NO-OP (zero network requests). Activity link → 404.
[Phase 4] Bundle 2.7 MB. Zero /api/, zero supabase, zero axios.
"$42,850" → string literal in JSX → HARDCODED.
"+12% vs last month" → string literal → HARDCODED.
[Phase 5] Verdict: 23 HARDCODED, 1 BROKEN, 1 NO-OP, 0 REAL.
Report written to ./mockhunter-report.md
User: /mockhunter audit https://example-saas.com
Skill: ...
[Phase 5] Verdict: 8 REAL, 18 HARDCODED (intentional marketing copy),
0 MOCK, 0 BROKEN, 2 UNKNOWN.
No console errors, no broken endpoints.
[email protected]) for any throwaway form tests, never the user's real credentialsnpx claudepluginhub sickn33/antigravity-awesome-skills --plugin antigravity-bundle-aas-mobile-app-builderAudits web app UX by dogfooding as user persona: tracks emotional friction, click efficiency, resilience to back/refresh, return intent. Uses Playwright/Chrome MCP for live sites, outputs ranked reports.
Validates web pages by detecting JavaScript errors, capturing console logs and screenshots, testing mobile/desktop viewports with 14 presets, and supporting authentication for protected apps.
Runs AI-powered adversarial UI testing via the browse CLI — analyzes git diffs, explores full apps, and tests functional correctness, accessibility, responsive layout, and UX heuristics. Use for QA pull requests, auditing accessibility, or exploratory testing.