From kk
Reviews git changes for SOLID violations, security risks, architecture smells, removal candidates, and code quality issues. Proposes actionable improvements during code reviews.
How this skill is triggered — by the user, by Claude, or both
Slash command
/kk:solid-code-reviewThe summary Claude sees in its skill listing — used to decide when to auto-load this skill
For capy knowledge base conventions, see [capy-knowledge-protocol.md](../_shared/capy-knowledge-protocol.md).
reference/go/code-quality-checklist.mdreference/go/removal-plan.mdreference/go/security-checklist.mdreference/go/solid-checklist.mdreference/java/code-quality-checklist.mdreference/java/removal-plan.mdreference/java/security-checklist.mdreference/java/solid-checklist.mdreference/js_ts/code-quality-checklist.mdreference/js_ts/removal-plan.mdreference/js_ts/security-checklist.mdreference/js_ts/solid-checklist.mdreference/kotlin/code-quality-checklist.mdreference/kotlin/removal-plan.mdreference/kotlin/security-checklist.mdreference/kotlin/solid-checklist.mdreference/python/code-quality-checklist.mdreference/python/removal-plan.mdreference/python/security-checklist.mdreference/python/solid-checklist.mdFor capy knowledge base conventions, see capy-knowledge-protocol.md.
Perform a structured review of the current git changes with focus on SOLID, architecture, removal candidates, and security risks. Default to review-only output unless the user asks to implement changes.
/kk:solid-code-review)Reviews code in the main conversation context. Fast, single-pass review using the workflow below.
/kk:solid-code-review:isolated)Delegates detection to independent reviewers that did not write the code, then annotates their findings with author context. Two parallel reviewers: a code-reviewer sub-agent and pal codereview (external model in native format). Produces a report organized by agreement level with corroborated findings highlighted.
See review-isolated.md for the isolated workflow.
| Level | Name | Description | Action |
|---|---|---|---|
| P0 | Critical | Security vulnerability, data loss risk, correctness bug | Must block merge |
| P1 | High | Logic error, significant SOLID violation, performance regression | Should fix before merge |
| P2 | Medium | Code smell, maintainability concern, minor SOLID violation | Fix in this PR or create follow-up |
| P3 | Low | Style, naming, minor suggestion | Optional improvement |
Phases:
See review-process.md for the detailed step-by-step process.
Standard mode:
/kk:solid-code-review
Isolated mode with independent sub-agents:
/kk:solid-code-review:isolated
npx claudepluginhub serpro69/claude-toolbox --plugin kkConducts multi-axis code reviews evaluating correctness, readability, architecture, security, and performance before merging changes.
Reviews implementation changes for quality, design, correctness, and maintainability. Uses Conventional Comments and a structured workflow to provide actionable feedback.
Performs structured code reviews checking requirements, quality, and security standards after changes or before merge. Uses git diffs, context snapshots, and blast radius for scope.