From code-reviewer
Use when considering whether review findings or engineer responses suggest the project's living reference docs need updating. Proposes changes explicitly and requires engineer confirmation before writing.
How this skill is triggered — by the user, by Claude, or both
Slash command
/code-reviewer:doc-updateThe summary Claude sees in its skill listing — used to decide when to auto-load this skill
After a review is complete and the engineer has responded to findings, consider whether the reference docs need updating. This skill guides the judgment about when to propose changes and how to apply them.
After a review is complete and the engineer has responded to findings, consider whether the reference docs need updating. This skill guides the judgment about when to propose changes and how to apply them.
Use your judgment. These are examples of the kind of situations that warrant asking, not an exhaustive checklist:
When in doubt, ask. The cost of asking is low; the cost of stale docs is high.
For each potential update, ask the engineer explicitly:
"You confirmed that [specific thing]. The current [doc name] says [current rule]. Should I update it to reflect [proposed change]?"
Or for new conventions:
"I noticed [pattern] consistently in this diff but it's not in the [doc name]. Should I add it?"
When updating a reference doc:
.claude/code-reviewer/reference/| Date | Change | Trigger |
|---|---|---|
| {today} | {what changed} | Review feedback on {branch_name} |
npx claudepluginhub openshift-service-mesh/ci-utils --plugin code-reviewerGuides creation, editing, and verification of skills for AI coding agents using test-driven development with subagent scenarios. Use when authoring or debugging skills.