From octave
Surfaces findings, trends, and patterns from sales conversations including objections, pain points, questions, and competitor mentions. Supports filtering by type, time range, segment, persona, or company.
How this skill is triggered — by the user, by Claude, or both
Slash command
/octave:insightsThe summary Claude sees in its skill listing — used to decide when to auto-load this skill
Surface insights from your sales conversations—objections, pain points, questions, and what's resonating. Learn from the field to improve your library and messaging.
Surface insights from your sales conversations—objections, pain points, questions, and what's resonating. Learn from the field to improve your library and messaging.
/octave:insights [--type <finding-type>] [--period <time-range>]
--type <type> - Focus on specific finding type (objections, pain-points, questions, competitors, value-props)--period <range> - Time range (today, week, month, quarter, custom)--segment <name> - Filter by segment--persona <name> - Filter by persona--company <domain> - Filter by company/octave:insights # Overview of recent insights
/octave:insights --type objections # Top objections
/octave:insights --type pain-points --period month # Pain points this month
/octave:insights --persona "CTO" # Insights from CTO conversations
/octave:insights --company acme.com # Insights from Acme conversations
When the user runs /octave:insights:
If no options provided, show an overview:
What insights would you like to explore?
1. Overview - Summary across all finding types
2. Objections - What objections are prospects raising?
3. Pain Points - What problems are prospects mentioning?
4. Questions - What are prospects asking about?
5. Competitors - Which competitors are coming up?
6. Value Props - Which value props are resonating?
7. Custom - Specific filters
Your choice (or just ask a question):
Use the MCP tools to gather data:
For Overview:
# Get recent events
list_events({
eventTypes: ["CALL_TRANSCRIPT", "EMAIL_SENT", "EMAIL_REPLY_RECEIVED"],
dateRange: { start: "<30 days ago>", end: "<today>" },
limit: 50
})
# Get finding aggregates
list_findings({
extractionTypes: [
"CALL_EXTERNAL_OBJECTIONS",
"CALL_EXTERNAL_BUSINESS_PROBLEMS",
"CALL_EXTERNAL_QUESTIONS_OR_CONFUSION_ABOUT_OFFERING",
"CALL_EXTERNAL_COMPETITORS_TO_OUR_OFFERING",
"CALL_INTERNAL_VALUE_PROP_PRESENTATIONS"
],
dateRange: { start: "<30 days ago>", end: "<today>" },
groupBy: "extractionType",
limit: 100
})
For Specific Type (e.g., Objections):
list_findings({
extractionTypes: ["CALL_EXTERNAL_OBJECTIONS", "EMAIL_OBJECTION"],
dateRange: { start: "<period start>", end: "<period end>" },
limit: 50
})
With Persona/Segment Filter:
list_findings({
extractionTypes: ["<types>"],
entityMatches: {
personaOIds: ["<persona_oId>"]
},
limit: 50
})
See overview-output.md for the overview output template.
See objections-output.md for the objection-type output template.
When user wants to see specific events:
get_event_detail({
eventOId: "<event_oId>"
})
Present the full context:
EVENT DETAILS: Call with John Smith (Acme Corp)
===============================================
Date: January 15, 2026
Duration: 32 minutes
Participants:
- Internal: Sarah (AE), Mike (SE)
- External: John Smith (VP Ops), Lisa Chen (Director)
Matched Persona: VP Operations
Matched Playbook: Enterprise Efficiency
---
KEY FINDINGS
Objections Raised:
• [12:34] John: "Your pricing is 2x what we're paying now for our current solution"
→ Response: Sarah mentioned ROI payback period
Pain Points Acknowledged:
• [08:15] John: "We're spending 20 hours a week on manual data entry"
→ Matches persona pain point ✓
• [15:42] Lisa: "The biggest issue is data not syncing between systems"
→ Consider adding to persona
Questions Asked:
• [18:20] John: "How long does implementation typically take?"
• [22:05] Lisa: "Do you integrate with Salesforce?"
Competitor Mentioned:
• [25:30] John: "We looked at [Competitor] last year but didn't move forward"
Value Props Delivered:
• [10:15] Sarah: "Customers typically see 80% reduction in manual work"
→ Positive response from John
---
[View full transcript] (uses get_event_detail with includeTranscript: true)
If user wants to update library based on insights:
Based on this insight, I recommend:
Update Persona: VP Operations
Add pain point: "Data silos causing manual reconciliation work"
Add objection: "Pricing compared to current solution"
Update Playbook: Enterprise Efficiency
Add objection handling: "Pricing 2x current solution"
Response: "Let's look at total cost of ownership including the 20 hours/week
your team spends on manual work. At $X/hour, that's $Y annually..."
Apply these updates?
1. Yes, update both
2. Update persona only
3. Update Motion ICP narrative only
4. Let me customize first
5. Skip
If yes, use update_entity to apply.
| Type | Description | Extraction Types |
|---|---|---|
| objections | Pushback and concerns raised | CALL_EXTERNAL_OBJECTIONS, EMAIL_OBJECTION |
| pain-points | Problems prospects mention | CALL_EXTERNAL_BUSINESS_PROBLEMS, EMAIL_PAIN_POINT |
| questions | Questions asked about offering | CALL_EXTERNAL_QUESTIONS_OR_CONFUSION_ABOUT_OFFERING, EMAIL_QUESTION |
| competitors | Competitor mentions | CALL_EXTERNAL_COMPETITORS_TO_OUR_OFFERING, EMAIL_COMPETITOR_MENTION |
| value-props | Value props that resonated | CALL_INTERNAL_VALUE_PROP_PRESENTATIONS, EMAIL_VALUE_PROP |
| use-cases | Use cases discussed | CALL_INTERNAL_USE_CASES_BROUGHT_UP, EMAIL_USE_CASE |
| proof-points | Proof points referenced | CALL_INTERNAL_PROOF_POINTS, EMAIL_PROOF_POINT |
list_events - Search events with filterslist_findings - Aggregate findings across eventsget_event_detail - Get detailed event info with transcript/contentget_entity - Get persona / segment / competitor / objection detailslist_motions / list_motion_icps / find_motion_icp - Pull the Motion ICP narrative (Target ICP overview, Operating landscape, Strategic narrative, Pains and consequences, Benefits and impacts, Methodology, References) for persona × segment contextsearch_knowledge_base - Find related library contentupdate_entity - Apply suggested updates to library entities (personas, segments, objections, etc.)update_motion_playbook - Edit Motion ICP narrative sections (Strategic narrative, Benefits and impacts, Pains and consequences) with field-informed refinementsNo Events Found:
No events found for the specified period.
This could mean:
- No calls/emails have been synced yet
- The date range is too narrow
- Filters are too restrictive
Try:
- Expanding the date range
- Removing filters
- Check that your CRM/email integration is connected in Octave
No Findings Extracted:
Events found but no findings extracted yet.
Findings are extracted automatically when events are processed. Recent events may still be processing.
Check back in a few minutes, or view raw events instead.
/octave:analyzer - Analyze specific conversations in depth/octave:wins-losses - Focus on deal outcomes/octave:audit - Ensure library captures field learnings/octave:library - Update library with insights/octave:battlecard - Competitive intelligence from conversation data/octave:icp-refine - Use conversation patterns to refine ICP/octave:enablement - Turn field insights into team enablement materialsnpx claudepluginhub octavehq/lfgtm --plugin octaveAnalyzes win/loss patterns in B2B sales from CRMs like HubSpot/Salesforce/Attio, enriches with emails/calls/web data, outputs ICP persona and strategy .docx report.
Analyze won and lost deals to identify patterns, improve win rates, and refine sales strategy. Use this skill whenever a rep or manager wants to understand why deals were won or lost, identify trends in pipeline outcomes, review deal performance over time, says "why did we lose that deal", "analyze our win rate", "what do our wins have in common", "post-mortem on this deal", or when conducting quarterly business reviews. Also trigger when someone uploads CRM export data for deal analysis, or when building training materials based on historical deal outcomes.
Analyzes deal outcomes and conversation patterns to refine ICP definitions and targeting criteria. Helps identify which segments, personas, and signals correlate with wins vs. losses.