Stats
Actions
Tags
From nw
Assigns reputation tiers to sources, cross-references claims for verification, detects biases, and standardizes citations with metadata.
How this skill is triggered — by the user, by Claude, or both
Slash command
/nw:nw-source-verificationThe summary Claude sees in its skill listing — used to decide when to auto-load this skill
Validate every source against the trusted source domains provided via prompt context.
Validate every source against the trusted source domains provided via prompt context.
| Tier | Score | Examples | Verification |
|---|---|---|---|
| High | 1.0 | Academic (.edu, arxiv.org, ieee.org), Official (.gov, w3.org, ietf.org), Tech docs (developer.mozilla.org), OSS foundations (apache.org, cncf.io) | Standard citation |
| Medium-High | 0.8 | Industry leaders (martinfowler.com, stackoverflow.com, infoq.com) | Cross-ref with 1+ high-tier |
| Medium | 0.6 | Community (medium.com verified experts, dev.to, hashnode.com) | Author verification + 3-source cross-ref |
| Excluded | 0.0 | Unverified blogs (*.blogspot.com, wordpress.com), quora.com, pastebin.com | Reject, log warning, find alternative |
Evaluate before citing:
When bias detected: note in Source Analysis, reduce confidence.
[1] {Author/Organization}. "{Title}". {Publication/Website}. {Date}. {Full URL}. Accessed {YYYY-MM-DD}.
Source URL | Domain | Access date | Reputation score (from tiers) | Verification status
Mark "[Paywalled]"/"[Restricted Access]" | Provide URL | Find open-access alternative | Note in Knowledge Gaps
npx claudepluginhub nwave-ai/nwave --plugin nwEvaluates source credibility using T1-T6 tiers and CRAAP framework. Assesses search results, GitHub repos, software packages, tools, and detects SEO spam/content farms.
Designs a source evaluation protocol using lateral reading and credibility checks for websites, news articles, social media, and other digital sources.
Finds and cites primary sources (arXiv, RFC, official docs) for each claim in a draft, enforcing a source hierarchy. Useful for fact-checking technical writing.