creating-agents

Creating Claude Code Agents

Expert guidance for designing and implementing Claude Code subagents based on Anthropic's official specification and industry best practices.

Core principles

Subagents solve three fundamental problems:

1. Context Preservation

Main conversation context is precious. Subagents isolate verbose operations (test runs, documentation fetches, log analysis) and return only summaries.

Without subagents: Running tests consumes 50K+ tokens in your main context With subagents: Test output stays in subagent context; you get a 500-token summary

2. Parallelization

Launch multiple subagents simultaneously for independent tasks:

Research the authentication, database, and API modules in parallel using separate subagents

Each explores its area independently, then Claude synthesizes findings.

3. Specialization

A single agent handling everything becomes a "jack of all trades, master of none." As instruction complexity increases, reliability decreases. Subagents enable focused expertise with minimal tool access.

How Delegation Works

Claude automatically delegates based on each subagent's description field. Write clear descriptions that include:

• What it does: "Reviews code for quality and security"
• When to use it: "Use proactively after code changes"
• Trigger keywords: Include terms users might say

Good description:

description: Reviews code for quality, security, and best practices. Use proactively after code changes or when user mentions review, audit, or code quality.

Bad description:

description: Helps with code

Agent Design Principles

1. Single Responsibility

Each subagent should excel at ONE specific task. Don't create a "helper" agent that does everything.

Good: code-reviewer, test-runner, doc-researcher Bad: general-helper, code-assistant, utility-agent

2. Minimal Tool Access

Grant only the tools necessary for the task:

Role	Recommended Tools
Reviewer/Auditor	Read, Grep, Glob
Researcher	Read, Grep, Glob, WebFetch, WebSearch
Implementer	Read, Write, Edit, Bash, Glob, Grep
Domain Expert	Read, Grep, Glob + domain-specific

See references/tool-permissions.md for detailed guidance.

3. Clear System Prompts

The markdown body becomes the subagent's system prompt. Be specific about:

• When to use which approach
• Output format expectations
• What NOT to do (constraints)

4. Model Selection

• haiku: Fast, cheap - ideal for read-only exploration
• sonnet: Balanced - good for most tasks
• opus: Most capable - use for complex reasoning
• inherit: Uses main conversation model (default)

YAML Frontmatter Reference

Field	Required	Description
name	Yes	Unique identifier (lowercase, hyphens)
description	Yes	When Claude should delegate
tools	No	Tools the agent can use (inherits all if omitted)
disallowedTools	No	Tools to explicitly deny
model	No	Model to use (default: inherit)
permissionMode	No	Permission handling mode
skills	No	Skills to preload into context
hooks	No	Lifecycle hooks for this agent

See references/official-spec.md for complete specification.

Orchestration Patterns

Fan-Out (Parallel Research)

Multiple agents explore different areas simultaneously:

Use subagents to research authentication patterns, database schema, and API design in parallel

Best for: Independent research tasks, codebase exploration, documentation gathering.

Pipeline (Sequential Processing)

Chain agents where each builds on previous results:

First use code-reviewer to find issues, then use debugger to fix them

Best for: Review-then-fix workflows, multi-stage processing.

Orchestrator-Worker

A lead agent decomposes tasks and delegates to specialists:

Analyze this feature request and delegate implementation to appropriate specialists

Best for: Complex features, large-scale refactoring.

See references/orchestration-patterns.md for detailed patterns.

Common Anti-Patterns

Avoid these mistakes when creating agents:

Anti-Pattern	Problem	Solution
Vague description	Claude doesn't know when to delegate	Include specific trigger keywords
Over-broad tools	Security risk, unfocused behavior	Grant minimal necessary permissions
No verification	Can't tell if agent succeeded	Include verification steps in prompt
Premature complexity	Multi-agent when single suffices	Start simple, add agents as needed
Generic naming	Hard to discover and delegate	Use specific, task-focused names

See references/anti-patterns.md for detailed guidance.

What Would You Like To Do?

1. Create a new agent - Step-by-step workflow guides
2. Use a template - Copy and customize ready-made agents
3. Audit an existing agent - Check against best practices
4. Learn design patterns - Understand orchestration and anti-patterns

---

1. Create a New Agent

Choose by agent type:

• Read-only agent - Reviewers, analyzers, auditors
• Code writer agent - Implementers, fixers, generators
• Research agent - Documentation and web researchers

2. Use a Template

Ready-to-use agents you can customize:

• Code reviewer - Quality and security review
• Debugger - Bug diagnosis and fixing
• Researcher - Web and documentation research
• Domain expert - Specialized domain expertise

3. Audit an Existing Agent

• Audit workflow - Checklist and improvement process

4. Learn Design Patterns

• Orchestration patterns - Fan-out, pipeline, orchestrator-worker
• Tool permissions - Selecting tools by role
• Anti-patterns - Common mistakes to avoid

Testing Your Agent

1. Manual Testing

# Test delegation
Use the [agent-name] to [task description]

# Test automatic delegation (if description says "use proactively")
[Task that should trigger the agent]

2. Verify Tool Access

Check the agent has exactly the tools it needs, no more:

Use [agent-name] to describe what tools you have access to

3. Test with Different Models

If you set model: haiku for speed, ensure instructions are clear enough:

• Haiku needs explicit, step-by-step instructions
• Sonnet/Opus can infer more from context

4. Check Edge Cases

• What happens if the agent can't find what it needs?
• Does it fail gracefully or loop indefinitely?
• Are error messages helpful?

Storage Locations

Location	Scope	Use Case
.claude/agents/	Current project	Team-shared, version-controlled
~/.claude/agents/	All your projects	Personal agents
--agents CLI flag	Current session	Testing, automation
Plugin agents/	Where plugin enabled	Distributed via plugin

Higher-priority locations override lower when names conflict.

Real-World Examples

See examples/real-world-agents.md for battle-tested agents including:

• Security auditor
• Performance analyzer
• Documentation generator
• Test writer
• Migration assistant

Success Criteria

A well-designed agent:

• Has a single responsibility - one job, minimal tools
• Has a specific description with trigger keywords (what AND when)
• Uses minimal tool access appropriate for its role
• Includes verification steps in its system prompt
• Handles failures gracefully with useful error messages
• Has been tested with explicit invocation and automatic delegation

References

• Official YAML specification
• Orchestration patterns
• Tool permissions by role
• Anti-patterns to avoid

Sources

Research for this skill was conducted from multiple authoritative sources:

• Official Claude Code Docs: Subagents
• Anthropic Engineering: Multi-Agent Research System
• Claude Agent SDK Blog
• VoltAgent Subagent Collection