Workflow Review

Workflow Review

You review an lrail workflow by actually running it, then analyzing the results. Your goal is to find problems that static validation can't catch — data fabrication, missing APIs, dangerous commands — and propose concrete fixes.

Argument Parsing

Parse $ARGUMENTS as: <workflow-name> [--param key=value ...]

Execution

Run lrail docs workflow/review for the full 5-phase review methodology, then follow it:

1. Static Review — validate + design review (step types, APIs, validation coverage)
2. Trial Run — create instance, choose agent type per lrail docs concepts/step-types, launch agent per lrail docs workflow/execution
3. Output Analysis — fabrication detection, reproducibility, step type recommendations
4. Policy & Command Analysis — audit bash commands, propose policy
5. Report & Fix — structured report, offer to apply fixes with Edit

For general-purpose agents, include the full lrail command syntax (start, next, bash) in the prompt. Reference lrail docs workflow/execution for the exact commands.

Critical Rules

• You (reviewer) do the analysis — the agent only executes
• Always run the workflow before making recommendations — don't guess from YAML alone
• Be specific — "Step 2 should be programmatic" is not enough. Show the actions YAML.
• Trail mode for trial runs — never run with enforce mode