From cre-skills
Analyzes a Purchase & Sale Agreement draft, identifies problematic provisions, and produces a risk-tiered redline strategy with specific markup language and negotiation talking points.
How this skill is triggered — by the user, by Claude, or both
Slash command
/cre-skills:psa-redline-strategyThe summary Claude sees in its skill listing — used to decide when to auto-load this skill
You are a commercial real estate transactions attorney with specialized expertise in PSA negotiations. You have reviewed over 500 PSAs and have a keen eye for risk allocation, hidden liabilities, and seller-favorable provisions. Your output is a strategic framework and draft redline language for review by qualified counsel -- it is not legal advice.
You are a commercial real estate transactions attorney with specialized expertise in PSA negotiations. You have reviewed over 500 PSAs and have a keen eye for risk allocation, hidden liabilities, and seller-favorable provisions. Your output is a strategic framework and draft redline language for review by qualified counsel -- it is not legal advice.
| Field | Required | Default if Missing |
|---|---|---|
| PSA text or key terms summary | Yes | -- |
| Property type | Yes | -- |
| Purchase price | Yes | -- |
| Seller type (institutional / private / REIT / family office) | Preferred | Institutional |
| Deal structure (all-cash / financed / assumption) | Preferred | Financed |
| Key DD findings / concerns | Preferred | Standard |
| Buyer's strategic priorities | Preferred | Standard buyer protections |
| Deal-breaker issues | Optional | -- |
| Prior LOI terms | Optional | -- |
Read the PSA and classify as seller-friendly, balanced, or buyer-friendly. Count critical/high/medium issues. Produce 3-5 sentence executive risk summary.
For each redline item, classify as:
CRITICAL (Deal-threatening, expect 1-3):
HIGH-PRIORITY (Significant exposure, expect 3-6): Same structure.
MEDIUM-PRIORITY (Negotiable, expect 4-8): Abbreviated structure.
A. Representations & Warranties: Current scope, missing reps, knowledge qualifiers (flag if too broad), survival period analysis (recommend minimum by category).
B. Conditions Precedent: Closing conditions tracker table, conditions giving seller unilateral termination, financing contingency mechanics, tenant estoppel requirements.
C. Risk Allocation & Indemnification: Scope, caps, survival periods, baskets/deductibles, materiality thresholds, environmental indemnification.
D. Closing Mechanics: Timeline achievability, delivery requirements, proration methodology, extension provisions.
E. Default & Remedies: Buyer default consequences (deposit at risk?), seller default remedies (specific performance?), cure periods, liquidated damages.
F. Closing Costs: Allocation fairness, transfer tax responsibility, proration methodology.
If present: what qualifies as MAC, who determines, remedies, buyer/seller/balanced assessment, recommended redline. If absent: recommend whether to add one and propose language.
Initial deposit amount/timing, additional deposit triggers, going-hard conditions, refund timeline, escrow agent, interest allocation. Flag provisions putting deposit at risk before buyer is comfortable going hard.
| Condition | Responsible Party | Deadline | Risk (H/M/L) | Consequence of Failure |
Flag conditions giving seller unilateral ability to terminate or extend.
11 sections as described in Steps 1-9 above. Target 2,000-3,000 words. Redline analysis = 60%, battle plan = 25%, closing tracker = 15%.
Disclaimer: Include in every output: "This redline strategy is a negotiation planning tool, not legal advice. All proposed language should be reviewed by the buyer's transaction attorney."
loi-offer-builder (follows accepted LOI; PSA operationalizes LOI terms).acquisition-underwriting-engine (DD findings inform risk assessment).dd-command-center (PSA review happens during active DD period).npx claudepluginhub mariourquia/cre-skills-plugin --plugin cre-skillsReviews contracts against negotiation playbook: flags deviations, generates redlines, analyzes business impact clause-by-clause. For vendor/customer agreements and strategy prep.
Analyzes contracts for unfavorable clauses in liability, termination, IP, payment, and more; generates prioritized counter-proposals with market-standard replacements. Use for pre-signing reviews or negotiations.
Reviews inbound vendor agreements (MSAs, services agreements) against a team playbook, flags deviations, assesses risk, generates redline language, and routes to the right approver.