From jira-orchestrator
Provides structured reasoning frameworks like Chain-of-Thought, Tree-of-Thought, Hypothesis-Driven Debugging, and Root Cause Analysis, always with mandatory documentation lookup before analysis.
How this skill is triggered — by the user, by Claude, or both
Slash command
/jira-orchestrator:reasoningThe summary Claude sees in its skill listing — used to decide when to auto-load this skill
Structured reasoning frameworks with mandatory documentation lookup for systematic problem solving.
Structured reasoning frameworks with mandatory documentation lookup for systematic problem solving.
This skill wraps two complementary capabilities:
Complex Reasoning (complex-reasoning.md) — Multiple reasoning frameworks (Chain-of-Thought, Tree-of-Thought, Hypothesis-Driven Debugging, Root Cause Analysis) that always query documentation before reasoning and store insights in memory.
Documentation Lookup (documentation-lookup.md) — Systematic documentation retrieval using Context7 MCP to ground all decisions in accurate, version-specific library documentation.
| Problem Type | Framework | Agent |
|---|---|---|
| Linear, sequential | Chain-of-Thought | hypothesis-debugger |
| Multiple valid approaches | Tree-of-Thought | requirements-analyzer |
| Complex bug, unclear root cause | Hypothesis-Driven Debugging | hypothesis-debugger |
| Incident, systemic issue | Root Cause Analysis | root-cause-analyzer |
| Any technology decision | Documentation Lookup | requirements-analyzer |
MANDATORY before any reasoning about technology:
See complex-reasoning.md for full reasoning framework details.
See documentation-lookup.md for documentation retrieval protocol.
Works with: hypothesis-debugger (debugging workflows), root-cause-analyzer (incident analysis), requirements-analyzer (architecture decisions), task-enricher (technical planning).
npx claudepluginhub markus41/claude --plugin jira-orchestratorProvides structured framework with specialized agents for research, analysis, architecture decisions, validation, synthesis, reviews, investigations, and reporting. For complex problems needing systematic exploration and persistent artifacts.
Enforces thinking disciplines for rigorous collaborative reasoning: map territory first, name confidence, sit with fog, verify before proposing, genuine agreement/disagreement. Auto-loaded by /figure-out, /define, and similar skills.
Provides structured reasoning for stalled debugging or complex problems: frame issues, track hypotheses, gather/evaluate evidence, progress confidence levels to avoid loops.