code-review

Context

• Review path: $1 (defaults to current directory if not specified)

Parameters

• $1: Path to review (defaults to current directory)

Your task

Delegate this task to the code-review agent.

Use the Agent tool with subagent_type: code-review to perform a comprehensive code review.

First, use the Glob tool to discover source files to review:

• **/*.py, **/*.js, **/*.ts, **/*.go, **/*.rs for source files
• **/*test* patterns for test files Then pass the discovered files to the agent.

The code-review agent should:

1. Analyze code quality:

   • Naming conventions and readability
   • Code structure and maintainability
   • SOLID principles adherence

2. Security assessment:

   • Input validation vulnerabilities
   • Authentication and authorization issues
   • Secrets and sensitive data exposure

3. Performance evaluation:

   • Bottlenecks and inefficiencies
   • Memory usage patterns
   • Optimization opportunities

4. Architecture review:

   • Design patterns usage
   • Component coupling
   • Dependency management

5. Test coverage gaps:

   • Missing test cases
   • Edge cases not covered
   • Integration test needs

6. Apply fixes where appropriate and safe

7. Generate report with:

   • Summary of issues found/fixed
   • Remaining manual interventions needed
   • Improvement recommendations

Provide the agent with:

• The review path from context
• Project type (language/framework)
• Any specific focus areas requested

The agent has expertise in:

• Multi-language code analysis (Python, TypeScript, Go, Rust)
• LSP integration for accurate diagnostics
• Security vulnerability patterns (OWASP)
• Performance analysis and optimization

Agent Teams (Optional)

For comprehensive review of large codebases, spawn specialized review teammates in parallel:

Teammate	Focus	Value
Security reviewer	OWASP, secrets, auth flaws	Deep security analysis without blocking quality review
Performance reviewer	N+1 queries, algorithmic complexity, resource leaks	Performance-focused review in parallel
Correctness reviewer	Logic errors, edge cases, type safety	Functional correctness in parallel

This is optional — the skill works without agent teams for standard reviews.