From private-equity
Drafts A股投委会备忘录 (IC Memos) for China-focused PE/IB deals, with structured sections on thesis, valuation, risk, and exit.
How this skill is triggered — by the user, by Claude, or both
Slash command
/private-equity:china-ic-memoThe summary Claude sees in its skill listing — used to decide when to auto-load this skill
Draft **A股投资委员会备忘录 (IC Memo)** — structured decision documents for investment committee reviews.
Draft A股投资委员会备忘录 (IC Memo) — structured decision documents for investment committee reviews.
get_quote(ticker) → Valuation context
get_financials(ticker, "income") → Financials
get_industry_stocks(industry="...") → Peer comparables
Standard A-share IC memo format:
【机密】投资委员会备忘录
项目名称:[Target Company]
交易类型:[Investment type: 股权投资 / 并购 / 老股转让]
推荐团队:[Team name]
日期:[Date]
═══════════════════════════════════════════
一、投资建议 (Recommendation)
[One-paragraph summary]
建议:[批准 / 有条件批准 / 否决]
投资金额:[XX亿]
目标股权:[XX%]
目标价格:[¥XX / EV XX亿]
二、交易概述 (Transaction Overview)
- 标的公司:[Name], [Industry], [Listing status]
- 交易结构:[Structure description]
- 预计交割:[Date]
- 投资回报预期:[Xx% IRR, Xx MOIC]
三、投资逻辑 (Investment Thesis)
[3-5 bullet points]
1. [Key driver 1]
2. [Key driver 2]
3. [Key driver 3]
四、市场与行业分析 (Market & Industry)
- 市场规模:[XX亿], 增速 [X%]
- 竞争格局:[Description]
- 政策环境:[Policy context]
- 趋势判断:[Secular trends]
五、目标公司分析 (Target Analysis)
- 商业模式:[Description]
- 竞争优势:[Bullets]
- 管理团队:[Assessment]
- 财务表现:[Summary]
六、估值分析 (Valuation)
- 交易估值:[XX亿 / Xx PE]
- 可比交易:[Comparable M&A]
- DCF估值:[XX亿]
- 估值区间:[XX-XX亿]
- Upside/Downside:[X% / X%]
七、风险因素 (Risk Factors)
- [Risk 1]: [Mitigation]
- [Risk 2]: [Mitigation]
- [Risk 3]: [Mitigation]
八、交易结构 (Transaction Structure)
- 投资金额:[XX亿]
- 股权比例:[XX%]
- 董事会席位:[X席]
- 业绩承诺:[如有]
- 反稀释条款:[Description]
- 退出安排:[IPO / 并购 / 回购]
九、退出策略 (Exit Strategy)
- 主要路径:[A股IPO / 并购 / 老股转让]
- 预计时间:[3-5年]
- 目标回报:[Xx IRR]
- 备选方案:[Alternative exits]
十、结论与建议 (Conclusion)
[Summary and committee ask]
需要委员会决策的事项:
1. [Decision item 1]
2. [Decision item 2]
Thesis quality check:
China-specific valuation considerations:
Standard A-share IC risk framework:
| Risk Category | Specific Risks |
|---|---|
| 市场风险 | A-share volatility, 涨跌停, retail sentiment |
| 政策风险 | Regulatory changes, 行业政策 |
| 公司治理 | 关联交易, 股东质押, 同业竞争 |
| 行业风险 | 产能过剩, 技术迭代, 竞争恶化 |
| 流动性风险 | 解禁压力, 交易量不足 |
| 退出风险 | IPO窗口, 并购买家兴趣 |
| 汇率风险 | For USD-denominated funds |
A-share exit analysis:
| Route | Timeline | Probability | Expected Multiple |
|---|---|---|---|
| A股IPO | 3-5 years | Medium | 3-8x |
| 并购退出 | 2-4 years | High | 2-4x |
| 老股转让 | 2-4 years | Medium | 1.5-3x |
| S基金 | 1-3 years | Low-Medium | 0.8-1.5x NAV |
Investment committee decision criteria:
| Criterion | Weight | Assessment |
|---|---|---|
| 投资逻辑清晰度 | 20% | Strong / Adequate / Weak |
| 团队质量 | 20% | Strong / Adequate / Weak |
| 市场吸引力 | 15% | Large / Medium / Small |
| 竞争壁垒 | 15% | High / Medium / Low |
| 财务表现 | 15% | Strong / Adequate / Weak |
| 估值合理性 | 10% | Cheap / Fair / Expensive |
| 风险可控性 | 5% | Low / Medium / High |
Overall recommendation:
If conditional approval:
| Condition | Owner | Deadline |
|---|---|---|
| e.g., 管理层尽调确认 | [Name] | [Date] |
| e.g., 估值上限确认 | [Name] | [Date] |
| e.g., 监管可行性确认 | [Name] | [Date] |
| Factor | China Context |
|---|---|
| Decision speed | Can be faster or slower depending on SOE vs private |
| Approval layers | Multiple for large deals (>1亿 threshold) |
| Policy alignment | 产业政策 alignment important |
| Relationship | 关系 (guanxi) influences deal flow and terms |
| Documentation | Detailed Chinese documentation required |
| Red Flag | Typical IC Reaction |
|---|---|
| 实际控制人不明 | Require ownership clarification |
| 关联交易占比高 | Require ring-fencing |
| 大额质押 | Require investigation |
| 持续经营能力质疑 | Require CF projections review |
| 估值显著高于同行 | Require premium justification |
| 退出路径不清晰 | Require exit analysis |
| 管理层不稳定 | Require retention analysis |
Before presenting:
npx claudepluginhub jwangkun/claude-for-financial-services-cn --plugin private-equityProvides UI/UX resources: 50+ styles, color palettes, font pairings, guidelines, charts for web/mobile across React, Next.js, Vue, Svelte, Tailwind, React Native, Flutter. Aids planning, building, reviewing interfaces.
Fetches up-to-date documentation from Context7 for libraries and frameworks like React, Next.js, Prisma. Use for setup questions, API references, and code examples.