From meta
Invoke before responding to any non-trivial task—enforces the 1% rule that if any skill has even a 1% chance of improving output, it must be invoked first.
How this skill is triggered — by the user, by Claude, or both
Slash command
/meta:using-skillsThe summary Claude sees in its skill listing — used to decide when to auto-load this skill
This skill enforces the discipline of skill invocation, preventing the agent from shortcutting workflows or rationalizing its way out of using available frameworks. It is the core defensive mechanism against AI overconfidence and drift.
This skill enforces the discipline of skill invocation, preventing the agent from shortcutting workflows or rationalizing its way out of using available frameworks. It is the core defensive mechanism against AI overconfidence and drift.
IF THERE IS EVEN A 1% CHANCE A SKILL APPLIES, INVOKE IT
AI models are biased toward immediate generation over reference-checking. This rule forces a "pause and check" behavior that prevents low-quality, ungrounded output.
digraph using_skills_flow {
"Task Received" [shape=doublecircle];
"Step 1: Check Skill Database" [shape=box];
"Decision: Is it ≥ 1%?" [shape=diamond];
"Step 2: Propose Skill to User" [shape=box];
"Step 3: Apply Skill Logic" [shape=box];
"Done" [shape=doublecircle];
"Task Received" -> "Step 1: Check Skill Database";
"Step 1: Check Skill Database" -> "Decision: Is it ≥ 1%?";
"Decision: Is it ≥ 1%?" -> "Step 2: Propose Skill to User" [label="yes"];
"Decision: Is it ≥ 1%?" -> "Done" [label="no"];
"Step 2: Propose Skill to User" -> "Step 3: Apply Skill Logic";
"Step 3: Apply Skill Logic" -> "Done";
}
Check the taxonomy of 41 skills across 6 families. Do not rely on memory; use the taxonomy to identify potential matches. (Source: system design)
Ask: "Is there even a 1% chance that [skill-name] would improve the outcome of this task?" If yes, it is mandatory to mention it. (Source: system design)
State clearly which skills apply and what value they add. Do not make the decision for the user; present it as a professional recommendation. (Source: system design)
Once a skill is selected, you MUST follow its state machine and iron laws without exception. (Source: system design)
REQUIRED SUB-SKILL: getting-started — for initial session context. RECOMMENDED SUB-SKILL: prompt-optimizer — to refine the invocation of other skills.
| Thought | Reality |
|---|---|
| "The user didn't ask for a skill, so I won't use one." | The user may not know which skills are available. It is your job to recommend them. |
| "This task is slightly different from the skill description." | Use the 1% rule; even a partial match provides better structure than no structure. |
| "I've already used three skills, adding another will be too complex." | Complexity is often exactly what a complex problem needs. |
| "I can just apply the principles of the skill without formally invoking it." | Formal invocation is the only way to ensure the state machine and iron laws are followed. |
These thoughts mean STOP — you are about to shortcut:
npx claudepluginhub joellewis/skill-library --plugin metaEnforces workflows for skill discovery and invocation before tasks: check all skills first, read relevant ones, brainstorm before coding, create todos for checklists.
Establishes the rule to invoke skills before any response, including clarifying questions. Use at the start of any conversation to ensure skills are applied.
Establishes the skill invocation protocol: Claude must check for and invoke relevant skills before any response, including clarifying questions. Use at conversation start.