From grimoire
Coaches a direct report using the GROW model (Goal, Reality, Options, Will) to solve problems or develop skills. Use when a manager wants to build self-sufficiency through structured questioning.
How this skill is triggered — by the user, by Claude, or both
Slash command
/grimoire:apply-grow-coachingThe summary Claude sees in its skill listing — used to decide when to auto-load this skill
Use the GROW model — Goal, Reality, Options, Will — to coach a direct report through a problem or development challenge by asking questions rather than giving answers.
Use the GROW model — Goal, Reality, Options, Will — to coach a direct report through a problem or development challenge by asking questions rather than giving answers.
Adopted by: Google's Project Oxygen (2008–2018) identified coaching as the #1 behavior of effective managers across all Google manager effectiveness surveys; the GROW model originated with John Whitmore and Timothy Gallwey, was formalized in the 1980s at McKinsey, and is now the standard coaching framework taught in corporate leadership programs at Google, Microsoft, Unilever, and the International Coaching Federation (ICF); Michael Bungay Stanier's "The Coaching Habit" — built on the same principles — has sold 1M+ copies and is used in manager training at LinkedIn, Slack, and Shopify Impact: Google's Project Oxygen data showed that managers with high coaching scores had direct reports with significantly higher performance ratings, lower attrition, and higher satisfaction scores; the key causal mechanism: coaching-style managers build employee self-sufficiency, while advice-giving managers build dependency — dependency requires continuous manager involvement and collapses when the manager is unavailable; Whitmore's research documents that people are 3–4× more likely to follow through on solutions they generated themselves versus solutions given to them Why best: Advice-giving (the default manager behavior) creates the right answer in the short term but the wrong habit in the long term — the employee learns to wait for the manager's answer rather than developing their own judgment; GROW provides a repeatable four-stage structure that guides employees to their own solutions while the manager facilitates, making the manager a multiplier rather than a bottleneck
Sources: Whitmore "Coaching for Performance" (Nicholas Brealey Publishing, 5th ed. 2017); Google re:Work "Guide: Coach Your Employees" (rework.withgoogle.com); ICF "Core Competency Framework" (coachingfederation.org); Bungay Stanier "The Coaching Habit" (Box of Crayons Press, 2016)
A coaching conversation is appropriate when:
A coaching conversation is NOT appropriate when:
Signal the mode explicitly: "I'm going to ask you some questions rather than give you my view — I want to hear how you're thinking about this."
The first step is not to understand the problem — it is to understand what outcome the employee wants from the coaching conversation itself. Without this, the conversation can wander without resolution.
Key questions:
"What would you like to get out of this conversation?"
"What would a good outcome of the next 30 minutes look like for you?"
"By the end of our time, what do you want to have clarity on or decided?"
A common goal: "I want to figure out how to handle [situation]." A vague goal: "I want to talk about [situation]." If the goal is vague, press: "When you say you want to talk about it — what specifically would feel resolved?"
The goal anchors the entire conversation. Return to it if the conversation drifts.
Explore the current situation — what is happening, what they have tried, what is getting in the way — through questions only. Resist interpreting or advising.
Key questions:
"What's happening right now? Tell me the situation."
"What have you already tried?"
"What's working? What isn't?"
"What's getting in the way?"
"What haven't you tried yet that might make a difference?"
"On a scale of 1–10, how much does this problem feel within your control?"
The manager's role in the Reality phase is to help the employee see the situation more clearly — not to add their own assessment of the situation. Ask questions that prompt reflection:
"What would a neutral observer say about the situation?"
"What are you not seeing that might be important?"
"If you imagine the situation six months from now if nothing changes, what does that look like?"
Once the reality is clear, generate a range of options. The key discipline: generate before evaluating. Premature evaluation shuts down creative options.
Key questions:
"What options do you have?"
"What else could you do?"
"If there were no constraints, what would you do?"
"What would someone you respect do in this situation?"
"What haven't you considered that might be worth exploring?"
Wait until the employee has generated at least 3–5 options before asking them to evaluate. The first option is usually the most obvious one; the third or fourth is usually where insight appears.
After options are generated, ask them to evaluate:
"Of those options, which feels most promising?"
"Which would you be most willing to commit to?"
"What are the trade-offs between these options?"
The manager should not rank or recommend options during the GROW conversation. If they ask "what would you do?", a response is: "I have a view, but I want to hear yours first — which feels most right to you?"
After they have committed to an option, if the manager has an important consideration the employee hasn't raised, it can be offered: "Can I share one thing I'm thinking about that you haven't mentioned?" — not as a redirect, but as additional input.
The coaching conversation only changes behavior if it ends with a specific commitment. Vague intentions do not become actions.
Key questions:
"What are you going to do? And by when?"
"How committed are you to that — on a scale of 1–10?"
"What might get in the way, and how will you handle that?"
"What support do you need from me?"
If commitment is low (below 7 on the 1–10 scale), surface the obstacle before ending: "You said 6 — what's the 6 telling us?" Often this reveals either a missing option that hasn't been considered, or that the stated option is not actually what the employee wants to do.
Close by confirming the action, the timeline, and how you'll follow up:
"So you're going to [specific action] by [date]. I'll check in on [date] —
is that right?"
At the agreed follow-up, start with: "You said you were going to [action] — how did it go?" Resist filling the gap with your own assessment. Let them report first.
If they succeeded: "What made it work? What did you learn?" — reinforces the skill of solving problems independently.
If they didn't: return to Reality and Options — "What got in the way? What would you do differently?"
npx claudepluginhub jeffreytse/grimoire --plugin grimoireShifts a manager's default interaction from giving advice to asking questions, helping direct reports build self-sufficiency and freeing the manager's time.
Provides radically candid coaching as a thinking partner for strategic situations, clarifying stakes, building domain expertise, and strengthening decisions.