kc-plugin-forge

Plugin Forge

One-command plugin development and quality pipeline. Orchestrates marketplace skills to scaffold, test, validate, and improve Claude Code plugins.

Prerequisites: superpowers + plugin-dev marketplace plugins must be installed. Optional: claude-md-management for self-improvement loop.

Read references before starting any phase:

Read → ${CLAUDE_PLUGIN_ROOT}/reference/quality-pipeline.md
Read → ${CLAUDE_PLUGIN_ROOT}/reference/learned-patterns.md

Routing

digraph forge {
  rankdir=TB;
  node [shape=diamond];
  input [label="Input?"];
  disambig [label="Ambiguous?\n(no path, multi-plugin)"];

  node [shape=box];
  ask [label="List plugins\nConfirm target + scope"];
  create [label="Phase 1: Scaffold\nInvoke plugin-dev:create-plugin"];
  audit [label="Phase 1: Validate\nDispatch plugin-dev:plugin-validator agent"];
  fix [label="Fix FAIL items\n(reference: quality-pipeline.md Phase 1)"];
  tdd [label="Phase 2: Skill TDD\nInvoke superpowers:writing-skills\nper skill in plugin"];
  dreaming [label="Phase 2.7: Dreaming\nPattern Promotion"];
  clean [label="Phase 2.5: Clean Profile\nSmoke Test"];
  agents [label="Phase 3: Agent Verify\nInvoke plugin-dev:agent-development\nper agent in plugin"];
  revalidate [label="Phase 4: Re-validate\nDispatch plugin-dev:plugin-validator agent"];
  report [label="Summary Report\n+ Learning + Doc-sync offer"];
  selfforge [label="self-forge\nPhase 2 TDD + Phase 2.7 Dreaming\n+ Phase 4 Learning"];

  input -> create [label="new <name>"];
  input -> disambig [label="bare / vague"];
  input -> dreaming [label="dreaming <path>\ndreaming --all\ndreaming --dry-run"];
  disambig -> ask [label="yes"];
  ask -> audit [label="full pipeline"];
  ask -> audit [label="validate-only\n(skip Phase 2-3)"];
  ask -> tdd [label="skill-tdd-only"];
  ask -> agents [label="agent-verify-only"];
  input -> audit [label="<path>"];
  input -> tdd [label="skill-tdd-only"];
  input -> agents [label="agent-verify-only"];
  input -> selfforge [label="self-forge"];
  selfforge -> tdd;
  create -> tdd;
  tdd -> dreaming;
  dreaming -> report [label="self-forge\n(skip clean + agents + revalidate)"];
  dreaming -> clean [label="full pipeline / skill-tdd-only / new"];
  dreaming -> report [label="standalone dreaming route"];
  reaudit [label="Re-validate FAIL items\nDispatch plugin-dev:plugin-validator agent"];
  audit -> fix [label="FAIL"];
  audit -> tdd [label="PASS\n(full pipeline)"];
  audit -> report [label="PASS\n(validate-only)"];
  fix -> reaudit;
  reaudit -> tdd [label="PASS"];
  reaudit -> fix [label="still FAIL"];
  clean -> agents;
  agents -> revalidate;
  revalidate -> report [label="PASS"];
  revalidate -> fix [label="FAIL"];
}

Route Selection Rules

• new <name> → Phase 1 scaffold → full pipeline
• <path> → Phase 1 validate → full pipeline (Phase 1→2→3→4). A path always triggers Phase 1 first — no exceptions, even if user claims prior validation.
• validate-only → Phase 1 validate → report (skip Phase 2 and 3)
• skill-tdd-only → Phase 2 + 2.5. Assumes structure was validated separately. Do NOT use this to bypass Phase 1 on a path-based invocation.
• agent-verify-only → Phase 3 only
• self-forge → Forge audits itself. Target is always ${CLAUDE_PLUGIN_ROOT}. Runs Phase 2 TDD (pressure test SKILL.md via superpowers:writing-skills) + Phase 2.7 Dreaming (scan forge's own learned-patterns.md → promote to quality-pipeline.md, skill-evolution.md, or SKILL.md Rules) + Phase 4 Learning. Skips Phase 1 (own structure is stable), Phase 1.5 (forge's evolution is pre-established), and Phase 3 (no agents). Use when: periodic self-audit, after editing references, or to check for SKILL.md drift. Self-forge uses a dedicated Detection signal table:

Hard Signal	Source	Example
Phase 2 TDD RED failure mode	SKILL.md weakness under pressure	Pressure scenario showed agent skipping Phase 1.5 despite rules
Phase 2 REFACTOR rationalization discovered	New anti-pattern in forge's own behavior	Agent reframed "skip" as "obvious intent" to avoid user prompt
Fix attempt > 1 (same issue fixed more than once)	Non-obvious self-referential problem	Edited same rule twice because first fix introduced new ambiguity
Workaround used (bypass instead of direct fix)	Forge's own process limitation	Used ad-hoc note instead of proper Detection → Capture flow
Reference file inconsistency found	File content contradicts SKILL.md or other references	skill-evolution.md Applicability table lists levels that SKILL.md Phase 1.5 doesn't offer; quality-pipeline.md gotcha contradicts a Rule
Dreaming promotion to skill_rule	Pattern mature enough to become a forge Rule	Pattern about fix-loop escalation promoted from learned-patterns.md to SKILL.md Rules

• dreaming <path> → Phase 2.7 only + commit + PR offer + report. Pure knowledge curation — does NOT run Phase 1/2/2.5/3/4.
• dreaming --all → Multi-plugin discovery + Phase 2.7 per plugin + commit + PR offer + report. Discovery order: $KC_WORKSPACE → ~/.claude/plugins/local/ → manual fallback.
• dreaming --dry-run → Phase 2.7 analysis only, no changes applied. Combinable with <path> or --all.
• --parallel — combinable with <path>, skill-tdd-only, or new <name>. Enables teammate dispatch for Phase 2 and Phase 3. Requires TeamCreate tool (Teams experimental flag). Falls back to sequential if unavailable. Not compatible with self-forge (forge has only 1 skill), validate-only, agent-verify-only, or dreaming routes.
• Bare or vague input (no path, no keyword, or ambiguous scope) → DISAMBIGUATE: list available plugins, confirm target + scope (full pipeline vs. validate-only) before proceeding. Never infer a default plugin.
• Phase 1.5 C follows Phase 1.5 B on routes that include Phase 1.5 (<path>, new <name>). Phase 1.5 C skipped on self-forge, skill-tdd-only, agent-verify-only, validate-only, and plugins with no agents.
• Phase 2.7 follows Phase 2 on all routes that include Phase 2 (<path>, skill-tdd-only, self-forge; also new <name> but skipped via entry gate — new plugins have 0 patterns). Phase 2.5 follows Phase 2.7 on routes that include Phase 2.5 (<path>, skill-tdd-only, new <name>). Phase 2.5 skipped on self-forge, validate-only, agent-verify-only.

Phase 1: Structure

New plugin (new <name>):

1. Invoke Skill: "plugin-dev:create-plugin" with plugin name
2. After scaffold, proceed to Phase 1.5 (Autonomy Decision)

Existing plugin (<path>):

1. Dispatch plugin-dev:plugin-validator agent with plugin path
2. Fix any FAIL items — consult quality-pipeline.md Phase 1 for known gotchas
3. Re-validate after fix — dispatch validator again on FAIL items only. Do NOT proceed to Phase 2 until all FAIL items are PASS.
4. WARN items: document in README, fix if quick
5. Proceed to Phase 1.5 (Autonomy Decision)

Phase 1.5: Autonomy Decision

Determine autonomy capabilities for the target plugin. Two dimensions: A (Self-Learning) and B (Doc Self-Iteration). Runs after Phase 1, before Phase 2.

Skip when: self-forge route (forge's own evolution is pre-established), skill-tdd-only route, agent-verify-only route.

A — Intent Detection

Analyze plugin description + planned skill types:

Detection Signal	Classification
Description contains: review, analyze, audit, triage, check, evaluate, assess	analysis
Description contains: sync, bump, scaffold, generate, compile, convert	utility
Description contains: create, build, new, init	scaffold
Mixed or ambiguous	mixed

Intent classification only sets the Recommended: field — it never bypasses the user prompt. Even when classification is unambiguous, present the full choice and wait for input.

A — User Choice

Present the following prompt:

Self-improvement capability for <plugin-name>:

  1. Full (D1 + D2) — learned-patterns.md + project CLAUDE.md writes
     Best for: plugins that review, analyze, or assess
  2. D1 only — learned-patterns.md only, no project-specific writes
     Best for: plugins that process data and may discover general patterns
  3. Skip — no self-improvement scaffolding
     Best for: pure utility (sync, convert, scaffold)

  Detected intent: <analysis/utility/scaffold/mixed>
  Recommended: <1/2/3>

  Your choice:

A — Scaffold Actions

Choice	Actions
1 (Full D1+D2)	Create reference/learned-patterns.md; add Full Learning step template to each skill; add Read → learned-patterns.md to setup; add D1 auto-append + D2 gated write to rules
2 (D1 only)	Create reference/learned-patterns.md; add D1-only Learning step template to each skill; add Read → learned-patterns.md to setup; add D1 auto-append to rules
3 (Skip)	No learned-patterns.md; no Learning step; Phase 4 report notes "Evolution: skipped (user choice)"

Templates for Learning steps: see ${CLAUDE_PLUGIN_ROOT}/reference/skill-evolution.md Integration Pattern → Level-specific scaffolding.

A — Existing Plugin Retrofit

When forging an existing plugin (not new):

• Plugin already has reference/learned-patterns.md → verify evolution setup matches existing level in Phase 2 step 6
• Plugin has no reference/learned-patterns.md → present the same three choices above (retrofit or confirm skip)

B. Doc Self-Iteration

Determine documentation self-sync capability for the target plugin. Runs alongside A (Self-Learning) in Phase 1.5.

Skip when: self-forge route, skill-tdd-only route, agent-verify-only route, validate-only route.

B — Auto-Derivation

Signal	→ Full	→ Light	→ Skip
docs/ dir with ≥3 files	✓
docs/ with <3 files		✓
README.md only		✓
No documentation at all			✓
≥3 skills	✓
Agent-only plugin (no skills)		✓
Mixed signals	suggest Full, user confirms

B — User Choice

Present after A (Self-Learning) choice:

Doc self-iteration for <plugin-name>:

  1. Full — doc-sync skill + doc-probe agent + reference
     Live behavioral probes verify doc accuracy
  2. Light — doc-sync skill + reference only
     Static scan + history enrichment, no live probing
  3. Skip — no doc-sync capability

  Detected: <Full/Light/Skip based on signals>
  Recommended: <1/2/3>

  Your choice:

B — Scaffold Actions

Choice	Actions
1 (Full)	Create skills/{{PLUGIN_NAME}}-doc-sync/SKILL.md from Full template; Create agents/doc-probe.md from agent template; Generate reference/doc-sync-context.md by scanning plugin (Source Map, Doc Structure, Probe Config via safety heuristic, Style Guide)
2 (Light)	Create skills/{{PLUGIN_NAME}}-doc-sync/SKILL.md from Light template (Phase 4 disabled); Generate reference/doc-sync-context.md without Probe Config section
3 (Skip)	No doc-sync components created. Phase 4 report notes "Doc sync: skipped (user choice)"

Templates: see ${CLAUDE_PLUGIN_ROOT}/reference/doc-sync-templates.md.

B — Existing Plugin Retrofit

When forging an existing plugin (not new):

• Plugin already has skills/*-doc-sync/ → verify setup matches level, skip scaffold
• Plugin has agents/doc-probe.md but no doc-sync skill → warn: orphan agent
• Plugin has neither → present the three choices above

B — Context Generation

When scaffolding reference/doc-sync-context.md:

1. Source Map: For each skills/*/SKILL.md and agents/*.md, infer doc target:

   • If docs/commands.md exists → skill flags/modes map there
   • If docs/architecture.md exists → agent descriptions map there
   • If no matching doc → leave Doc Target as (new doc needed)

2. Probe Config: For each skill, apply Probe Safety Heuristic (see doc-sync-templates.md):

   • Read SKILL.md content, search for skip signals (browser, base_url, mcp__, deploy/publish)
   • Skills with --check or --dry-run modes → cli using that safe mode
   • Default → cli (optimistic, self-corrects via env_dependent)

3. Doc Structure: Scan docs/*.md + README.md, infer auto-sync level:

   • File contains only tables/lists derived from source → yes
   • File contains narrative/tutorial content → partial
   • Default → partial (safe: preserves hand-written content)

Phase 1.5 C: Agent Teams Capability Decision

Determine Agent Teams support for the target plugin. Runs after B (Doc Self-Iteration), before Phase 2.

Skip when: self-forge route, skill-tdd-only route, agent-verify-only route, validate-only route, plugin has no agents.

C — Auto-Detection

Signal	→ Full Teams	→ Skip
Plugin has browser-operating agents (tools include Bash)	✓
Plugin has multi-agent dispatch (skill dispatches 2+ agents)	✓
Plugin has only analysis agents (Read/Grep/Glob — no Bash)		✓
Plugin has no agents		✓

C — User Choice

Agent Teams capability for <plugin-name>:

  1. Full — Teams protocol + fallback + per-agent Team Mode section
     Best for: browser-operating agents, multi-agent orchestration
  2. Skip — no Teams support (pure subagent mode)
     Best for: analysis-only agents, single-agent plugins

  Detected: <Full/Skip based on signals>
  Recommended: <1/2>

  Your choice:

C — Scaffold Actions

Choice	Actions
1 (Full)	Create references/agent-teams.md from template in agent-teams-quality.md; add Team Mode Protocol section to each browser-operating agent; add Teams mode detection + --no-teams flag + fallback path to dispatch skills
2 (Skip)	No Teams components created. Phase 4 report notes "Teams: skipped (user choice)"

Templates: see ${CLAUDE_PLUGIN_ROOT}/reference/agent-teams-quality.md.

C — Existing Plugin Retrofit

When forging an existing plugin (not new):

• Plugin already has references/agent-teams.md → verify setup matches in Phase 3 step 6
• Plugin has agents with ## Team Mode Protocol but no shared reference → warn: missing shared protocol
• Plugin has neither → present the two choices above

Phase 2: Skill TDD

Parallel mode (--parallel)

When --parallel is set AND TeamCreate is available, Phase 2 runs all skills concurrently:

1. Minimum threshold: If plugin has ≤1 skill AND ≤1 agent, --parallel silently degrades to sequential (log: "Parallel skipped — N=1, no parallelism benefit"). Do not create a team.
2. TeamCreate("forge-<plugin-name>") (if not already created)
3. For each skill, spawn a teammate: Agent(team_name="forge-<plugin>", name="tdd-<skill-name>", prompt=<Phase 2 teammate template from parallel-forge.md>)
   • Stagger spawns by 2 seconds to avoid API burst
   • Show cost estimate before spawning: "Parallel: N teammates × ~120K tokens. Proceed?"
4. Collect all SKILL_TDD_COMPLETE messages from teammates
5. Process findings: apply three-question test → write qualifying D1 entries to learned-patterns.md sequentially
6. Shutdown Phase 2 teammates
7. If any teammate failed to report → run that skill sequentially as fallback

Reference: ${CLAUDE_PLUGIN_ROOT}/reference/parallel-forge.md

Sequential mode (default)

For EACH skill in the plugin's skills/ directory:

1. Invoke Skill: "superpowers:writing-skills" — follow its RED/GREEN/REFACTOR cycle
2. RED: Design 3-4 pressure scenarios, run with general-purpose subagents
3. GREEN: Write or refine skill content addressing baseline failures
4. REFACTOR: Find new rationalizations, plug loopholes, add discipline guards
5. Verify token budget: aim for <800 words; extract heavy content to reference/
6. Verify Evolution Setup (if applicable):
   • Determining level (priority order): (a) Phase 1.5 choice from this session → use it. (b) Phase 1.5 did not run (e.g., skill-tdd-only) → auto-detect: plugin has reference/learned-patterns.md + skills have D2 gates → Full; has learned-patterns.md + D1 only → D1; no learned-patterns.md → Skip. (c) self-forge route → verify forge's own Full D1+D2 setup is intact.
   • Full or D1: Learning step present at end of skill? Setup reads learned-patterns.md? Rules include appropriate D1/D2 entries? "Nothing novel is valid" explicitly stated?
   • Skip: note in report, move on.
   • Reference: ${CLAUDE_PLUGIN_ROOT}/reference/skill-evolution.md.
7. Verify Teams Setup (if applicable):
   • Determining level: (a) Phase 1.5 C choice from this session → use it. (b) Phase 1.5 C did not run → auto-detect: plugin has references/agent-teams.md + agents have Team Mode Protocol → Full; neither → Skip.
   • Full: For each skill that dispatches agents: Teams mode detection present? --no-teams flag documented? Fallback path explicit? Error handling covers TeamCreate failure? Add Teams-specific pressure scenarios (T1-T4 from agent-teams-quality.md) to the RED phase.
   • Skip: note in report, move on.
   • Reference: ${CLAUDE_PLUGIN_ROOT}/reference/agent-teams-quality.md.

Skip if plugin has no skills.

Phase 2.5: Clean Profile Smoke Test

Runs after Phase 2 TDD passes. Verifies skill works without user-specific context (no MEMORY.md, no user CLAUDE.md, no other plugin hooks).

Parallel mode (--parallel)

When --parallel is set, run all smoke tests as background Bash processes (no teammates needed — each is an independent claude --bare process). See parallel-forge.md § Phase 2.5 for the shell pattern. Collect exit codes and metrics after all complete.

Sequential / Parallel common steps

For EACH skill that passed Phase 2:

1. Load smoke definition: ${TARGET_PLUGIN}/smoke-tests/<skill-name>.smoke.yaml if exists, else auto-generate from SKILL.md:
   • Trigger: extract from description: "Use when [triggers]" → first clause as prompt. Fallback if no "Use when": use "/<skill-name>" as prompt (slash prefix signals invocation intent — bare skill name produces topic summaries in --bare mode).
   • Assertions: Phase/Step names → contains:, tool invocations → contains:, fixed: not_contains: "MEMORY.md", not_contains: "previous session". Limit: 3-7 (fallback: 2-3 fixed only).
   • Auto-generated smoke is ephemeral (not saved).
   • Timeout: 90s default for auto-generated smoke tests.
   • Skip auto-generate for skills whose SKILL.md contains AskUserQuestion without a non-interactive path.
2. Run smoke test: ${CLAUDE_PLUGIN_ROOT}/reference/clean-profile-test.sh <plugin-dir> <trigger> <timeout> [assertions...]
   • The script auto-resolves ANTHROPIC_API_KEY: (1) env var already set → use it, (2) read ~/.claude/kc-plugins-config/forge.yaml → api_key_file path → source it, (3) neither → exit 2.
   • Exit 0 = pass (with metrics), exit 1 = assertion failure (with metrics), exit 2 (execution error) → treat as (clean profile unavailable).
   • Metrics: The script outputs cost=$N.NNNN duration=NNNNms tokens=NNNin+NNNout key_source=<env|path> on both PASS and FAIL. Parse and accumulate for the Phase 4 report. Show key_source in the report's Clean Profile section.
3. Compare results: The Phase 2 TDD pass result (from the current session) serves as the polluted baseline — it passed with user-specific context present.
   • Both pass → (verified: clean) in report
   • Polluted pass + clean fail → WARNING with failing assertions listed. Skill depends on external context.
   • Clean unavailable → (clean profile unavailable) in report
4. Clean profile WARNING does not block Phase 3 — it is reported in Phase 4
5. Any context-dependent warning → downgrades Overall verdict from PASS to CONDITIONAL PASS (advisory, does not block shipping)

Skip when: self-forge route, validate-only route, agent-verify-only route.

Phase 2.7: Dreaming — Pattern Promotion

Analyzes mature patterns in learned-patterns.md and promotes them into structured reference files. Runs after Phase 2 TDD on all routes that include Phase 2.

Skip when: new <name> route (no patterns yet), validate-only route, agent-verify-only route.

Entry Gate

dated_patterns = [h for h in "##" and "###" headings if heading contains "(YYYY-MM-DD)" or "[YYYY-MM-DD]" suffix]
if len(dated_patterns) < 5:
    log "Dreaming: skipped (only {N} dated patterns, minimum 5)"
    → in-pipeline: proceed to next phase (Phase 2.5 or Phase 3)
    → standalone: report "skipped" and move to next plugin (or exit)

Age filter: among dated patterns, only those ≥ 7 days old become candidates. If zero candidates after age filter → skip with log.

Note: The spec's entry gate pseudocode shows only "##" headings. This implementation intentionally scans both ## and ### to support structured-format plugins (e.g., kc-team-ops uses ## Section with potential ### Pattern (date) sub-entries).

Pattern Boundary Detection

Two learned-patterns.md formats exist. Detection is date-suffix-based, not heading-level-based:

1. Scan all ## and ### headings
2. Headings with (YYYY-MM-DD) or [YYYY-MM-DD] suffix = dated pattern entries (regardless of level)
3. Headings without date suffix = organizational sections (ignored as candidates)
4. Pattern content = text from dated heading to next heading of same or higher level

Step 2.7.1: Inventory

For each dated heading in learned-patterns.md:

• Extract: title, date, full content
• Apply age filter (≥ 7 days)
• Build candidate list

Note: If Phase 2 TDD's Learning step just wrote a new D1 pattern, its age is 0 days → excluded by age filter. No special handling needed.

Step 2.7.2: Duplicate Detection

For each candidate, check against all reference files in {plugin}/reference/*.md (excluding learned-patterns.md itself):

• Batch for efficiency: group all candidate summaries against one reference file per LLM call (reduces calls from N_candidates × N_files to N_files)
• LLM judge: "Does this reference file already contain a rule/heuristic covering the same insight?"
• already-covered → auto-cleanup: delete from learned-patterns.md, notify user
• not-covered → proceed to Step 2.7.3

Cleanup is automatic (low-risk). Does NOT count toward max promotions limit.

Step 2.7.3: Placement Analysis

For each not-covered candidate, LLM determines promotion target:

Input:

• Pattern content (full text)
• Target plugin's reference files: section headings + full content of the most likely target section (needed to match style and detect conflicts). Self-forge targets: quality-pipeline.md, skill-evolution.md; other reference files are valid only if semantically appropriate.
• SKILL.md Rules section

Output per pattern:

• target_file, target_section
• promotion_type: new_entry | enhance_existing | new_section | skill_rule
• conflict_detected: boolean
• draft_content: adapted to target section's style

Promotion types:

Type	Meaning
new_entry	Add entry to existing section
enhance_existing	Strengthen an existing entry's description
new_section	Create new section in target file
skill_rule	Promote to target plugin's SKILL.md Rules section

skill_rule targets the plugin being dreamed about (not forge, unless self-forge). Multi-target patterns: LLM may return multiple targets; user approves subset. Pattern removed from learned-patterns.md once promoted to ≥1 target — unapproved targets are not revisited (user's conscious decision).

Step 2.7.4: Confirm & Execute

Present plan:

## Dreaming — <plugin-name> (N candidates, M already covered)

Cleanup (auto):
  - "pattern title" → already in <file> §<section>

Promotions (need approval):
| # | Pattern | → Target | Section | Type |
|---|---------|----------|---------|------|
| 1 | "..." | reference-file.md | §Section | new_entry |

Apply which? [all / <numbers> / none]

skill_rule items require per-item confirmation even in batch all.

Conflict handling: If conflict_detected, present both sides, ask user to: update old rule / discard pattern / merge.

After approval:

Step A — Apply locally:

1. Edit target reference files (insert draft_content)
2. Delete promoted patterns from learned-patterns.md

In-pipeline: Step A edits remain as working-tree changes — do NOT commit. Phase 4 report records the dreaming results. Commit is handled by the user or the pipeline's own commit flow.

Step B — Offer PR (standalone dreaming route only, skip in-pipeline): 3. Plugin repo has remote → offer PR branch: kc-plugin-forge/dreaming-YYYY-MM-DD 4. Commit message: docs(dreaming): promote N patterns to reference files 5. No remote → "changes are local only"

Safety Boundaries

Limit	Value
Max promotions per plugin per run	5 (oldest first if exceeded)
Max skill_rule promotions per plugin	2
Min pattern age	7 days
Min dated pattern count (entry gate)	5
Conflict	Block + ask user
Cleanup	Unlimited (auto, no cap)
skill_rule target	Target plugin's SKILL.md, never forge's (unless self-forge)

Standalone dreaming Route

When invoked as dreaming <path>, dreaming --all, or dreaming --dry-run:

Discovery for --all (first successful strategy wins):

1. $KC_WORKSPACE env var set → find "$KC_WORKSPACE" -path "*/reference/learned-patterns.md" -maxdepth 5
2. ~/.claude/plugins/local/ exists → find + readlink to resolve source paths
3. Fallback → ask user for explicit paths

--dry-run: Run Steps 2.7.1–2.7.3, present the confirmation table, then stop: [DRY-RUN] No changes applied. Re-run without --dry-run to execute.

Standalone report format:

Dreaming Report
───────────────
Plugins scanned: N
  plugin-a: X promoted, Y cleanup, PR #NN
  plugin-b: 0 candidates (no dated patterns)

Total: X promoted, Y cleanup

Edge cases:

• Plugin has learned-patterns.md but zero other reference files → report advisory ("Consider creating reference files via forge Phase 1.5"), skip
• Plugin's learned-patterns.md has no dated patterns → skip with "no dated patterns"

Read Instruction Stability

Skills that read learned-patterns.md (e.g., kc-pr-review Step 5a-k) do NOT need modification after dreaming. The Read → learned-patterns.md instruction remains — the file just gets leaner. Promoted patterns are now in reference files that the skill already reads. Do NOT add Read instructions to other plugins' skills as part of dreaming.

Phase 3: Agent Verify

Parallel mode (--parallel)

When --parallel is set AND TeamCreate is available (team already created in Phase 2):

1. For each agent, spawn a teammate: Agent(team_name="forge-<plugin>", name="verify-<agent-name>", prompt=<Phase 3 teammate template from parallel-forge.md>)
2. Collect all AGENT_VERIFY_COMPLETE messages
3. Shutdown Phase 3 teammates
4. If any teammate failed to report → run that agent sequentially as fallback

Reference: ${CLAUDE_PLUGIN_ROOT}/reference/parallel-forge.md

Sequential mode (default)

For EACH agent in the plugin's agents/ directory:

1. Invoke Skill: "plugin-dev:agent-development" — use as validation checklist
2. Verify: name format, description with <example> blocks, model choice, color, tools restriction
3. Verify: system prompt in 2nd person, input/output contract, rules + anti-patterns
4. Verify: reference paths use ${CLAUDE_PLUGIN_ROOT}
5. Run 1 dispatch test: simulate a scenario matching the agent's trigger — must verify the agent produces a meaningful response (not just "starts without error"). For simple wrapper agents, verify it correctly invokes its target tool/skill.
6. Verify Agent Teams Readiness (if applicable):
   • Determining level: same as Phase 2 step 7.
   • Full: For each agent, run checklist A1-A4 from agent-teams-quality.md. For plugin-level, run P1-P3. For each dispatch skill, verify S1-S5.
   • Skip: note in report, move on.
   • Reference: ${CLAUDE_PLUGIN_ROOT}/reference/agent-teams-quality.md.

Skip if plugin has no agents.

Phase 4: Re-validate + Report

1. Dispatch plugin-dev:plugin-validator agent — expect all previous FAIL items resolved
2. Generate summary:

Plugin Forge Report: <plugin-name>
─────────────────────────────────
Structure:  PASS/FAIL (N items fixed)
Skills:     N skills tested (M scenarios, K passed)
Clean Profile: N skills verified (K clean-pass, J context-dependent)
               Mode: clean / unavailable
               Key source: <env | path-to-file>
               Cost: $N.NNNN | Duration: NNNNms | Tokens: NNNin+NNNout
Dreaming:   N candidates → M promoted, K cleanup
            Promoted: <file> §<section>, ...
            Cleanup: K patterns already covered
Agents:     N agents verified
Teams:      Full (N agents Teams-ready, M skills with fallback) / Skipped
Evolution:  N skills with self-improvement
            Level: Full (D1+D2) / D1 only / Skipped
            This run: M new patterns captured, K "nothing novel"
Parallel:   N teammates, wall time Xmin (vs ~Ymin sequential est.)
Overall:    PASS / CONDITIONAL PASS / FAIL

3. Learning — Detection (mandatory): Scan this forge run for hard signals:

Hard Signal	Source
Phase 1 FAIL item fixed	Structural problem = potential new gotcha
Phase 2 TDD RED failure mode	Skill weakness = potential pattern
Phase 2 REFACTOR rationalization discovered	New anti-pattern
Phase 3 agent verification failure	Agent design issue
Fix attempt > 1 (same issue fixed more than once)	Non-obvious problem
Workaround used (bypass instead of direct fix)	Tool/process limitation

This is a closed list. For self-forge runs, use the self-forge-specific subset (see Route Selection Rules).

Do not pre-judge signal coverage — even if you already know a signal is documented, execute the comparison in step 4 regardless. Pre-knowledge does not excuse the comparison step.

• Hard signals found → proceed to step 4 (Capture)
• No hard signals → proceed to step 5 (Light Reflection)

4. Learning — Capture (conditional on hard signals): For each signal: a. Compare against existing knowledge base (forge: both learned-patterns.md + quality-pipeline.md; generated plugins: learned-patterns.md only) — already covered? b. Already covered → skip (note: "covered by: [pattern name]") c. Not covered → determine placement: cross-project general pattern → learned-patterns.md (D1); forge-specific gotcha → quality-pipeline.md d. Write entry, briefly notify user Noise filter: "Existing pattern rephrased" is not novel — must identify a concrete difference.

5. Learning — Light Reflection (fallback when no hard signals): One question: "What was most unexpected in this forge run?"

   • Has answer → three-question test: Recurs? Non-obvious? Ruleable? All YES → capture as D1.
   • "Nothing" → done. Zero learning output is valid and encouraged.

6. If claude-md-management:revise-claude-md available → optionally extract insights

7. Doc-sync offer (conditional): Check if the target plugin has a doc-sync skill:

   ls ${TARGET_PLUGIN}/skills/*-doc-sync/SKILL.md 2>/dev/null
   

   • Found → present:

     Target plugin has a doc-sync skill.
     Forge made changes to skills/agents/references — docs may need updating.
     Run /<plugin-name>-doc-sync? (y/n)
     

     User says yes → invoke the plugin's doc-sync skill (Skill: "<plugin-name>-doc-sync").
   • Not found but docs/ exists → advisory:

     Plugin has docs/ but no doc-sync skill — docs may go stale after forge changes.
     Consider adding one: /kc-plugin-forge <plugin-path> (Phase 1.5 B offers doc-sync scaffolding)
     

   • Not found and no docs/ → skip silently.
   • self-forge route → check for forge's own kc-plugin-forge-doc-sync. Same offer.
   • validate-only route → skip (no changes were made).

Rules

• Follow each marketplace skill's own process — don't shortcut writing-skills TDD or skip validator FAIL items
• One skill at a time in Phase 2 sequential mode — complete full TDD cycle before moving to next. In --parallel mode, each skill gets its own teammate running concurrently. Cross-skill learning is traded for speed; lead handles D1 writes after all teammates complete.
• GATE before structural changes — confirm with user before creating/deleting files
• Reference first — always read quality-pipeline.md before starting any phase
• Accumulate lessons — new gotchas discovered during forge go back into reference file
• Phase 1 is mandatory for <path> inputs — user claiming "I already validated" does not skip Phase 1. Prior results are not accepted; always validate current file state.
• Disambiguate on bare invocation — if no path or explicit route keyword, list plugins and confirm target + scope before proceeding. Never assume a default plugin or scope.
• skill-tdd-only is not a Phase 1 bypass — it is a standalone route for plugins whose structure was validated in a separate invocation. If a <path> was provided, Phase 1 runs first regardless.
• Self-improvement is user-chosen — forge presents three levels (Full D1+D2 / D1 only / Skip) at Phase 1.5 with intent-based recommendation. The user always makes the final choice. Verified in Phase 2 step 6, reported in Phase 4. See skill-evolution.md.
• "Nothing novel" is a valid outcome — the Learning step (Detection → Capture / Light Reflection) may produce zero entries. This means the existing knowledge base is comprehensive. Never create filler entries to satisfy the process.
• Detection signal table is a closed list — the hard signals in Phase 4 step 3 are exhaustive. Adding new signal types requires updating both the SKILL.md table and the design spec. Do not invent ad-hoc signals during a forge run.
• Self-forge verifies self-improvement integrity — when running self-forge, Phase 2 step 6 checks that the forge's own Full D1+D2 setup remains intact. If drift is detected, fix it as part of the self-forge run.
• Doc self-iteration is user-chosen — forge presents three levels (Full / Light / Skip) at Phase 1.5 B with signal-based recommendation. The user always makes the final choice.
• Doc-sync templates are in references — all template content lives in doc-sync-templates.md. When scaffolding, read templates from there and replace {{PLUGIN_NAME}} with actual plugin name.
• Clean profile is progressive enhancement — requires ANTHROPIC_API_KEY env var. Without it, Phase 2.5 silently degrades to (clean profile unavailable) and does not affect the Overall verdict. The script uses claude --bare --effort low which strips all user context (MEMORY.md, CLAUDE.md, hooks) while loading only the target plugin via --plugin-dir. --effort low reduces cost ~77% and time ~50% without affecting assertion reliability. Do NOT downgrade to haiku — it fabricates prior context, defeating the smoke test's purpose.
• Smoke test directory convention — hand-written smoke files go in ${TARGET_PLUGIN}/smoke-tests/<skill-name>.smoke.yaml. This directory name avoids collision with generic tests/.
• Dreaming respects entry gate — fewer than 5 dated patterns or all patterns younger than 7 days → skip Phase 2.7 silently. Do not prompt user or suggest workarounds.
• Cleanup is automatic, promotion needs approval — removing already-covered patterns from learned-patterns.md is low-risk and auto-executed. Promoting to reference files changes skill behavior and requires user confirmation. skill_rule promotions require per-item confirmation even in batch mode.
• No new reference files in dreaming — if a plugin has no reference files to promote into, report an advisory and skip. Creating reference files is Phase 1.5's responsibility.
• Standalone dreaming is independent — dreaming <path> and dreaming --all do not run Phase 1/2/2.5/3/4. They are pure knowledge curation operations with their own commit + PR flow.
• Discovery falls through gracefully — dreaming --all tries $KC_WORKSPACE → ~/.claude/plugins/local/ → manual. If no strategy succeeds, ask user for explicit paths. Never silently skip discovery failure.
• Agent Teams is progressive enhancement — Teams support is optional and must never break subagent mode. Phase 1.5 C presents Full/Skip choice. Phase 2 step 7 adds Teams-specific pressure scenarios (T1-T4). Phase 3 step 6 verifies agent + skill + plugin-level Teams readiness. All checks reference agent-teams-quality.md. When Teams is skipped, report notes "Teams: skipped" and no Teams checks run.
• Teams fallback is the critical path — the most important Teams verification is not "does it work with Teams" but "does it survive without Teams." T1 (TeamCreate unavailable) and T3 (--no-teams) are higher priority than T2 (teammate crash). A skill that hangs when TeamCreate is missing is worse than a skill with imperfect Teams orchestration.
• Parallel mode is opt-in — --parallel flag enables teammate dispatch for Phase 2/3. Default is sequential. When TeamCreate is unavailable, --parallel silently degrades to sequential with a log message.
• Teammates don't write shared resources — Phase 2 teammates must NOT write to learned-patterns.md or any shared reference file. They return findings to the lead, who writes D1 entries sequentially. This prevents concurrent append corruption.
• Rate limit circuit breaker — 2nd rate limit across any teammate → stop spawning, drain existing teammates, process remaining work sequentially. Show cost estimate before spawning teammates.