GOV - Government & Public Sector Skills

GOV - Government & Public Sector Skills

Service Line Overview

Code: GOV Full Name: Government & Public Sector Fee Modifier: 0.85 Description: E-government services, policy analysis, transparency platforms, citizen services

---

Skills Index

#	Skill	Command	Purpose
1	E-Government Assessment	/gov-egov-assess	Assess e-government maturity
2	Citizen Service Blueprint	/gov-citizen-svc	Design citizen service delivery
3	Policy Analysis Framework	/gov-policy	Analyze policy implications
4	Transparency Audit	/gov-transparency	Audit transparency and open data
5	Section 508 Compliance	/gov-508	Verify accessibility compliance
6	Procurement Support	/gov-procurement	Support government procurement
7	Stakeholder Engagement	/gov-stakeholder	Plan public stakeholder engagement
8	Regulatory Impact Assessment	/gov-ria	Assess regulatory impact

---

Skill 1: E-Government Assessment

Command: /gov-egov-assess

Purpose

Assess the maturity of government digital services and e-government capabilities using international frameworks and benchmarks.

Inputs Required

government_level: "federal|state|local|municipal|agency"
entity_name: "Government Entity Name"
population_served: 500000
current_services:
  - name: "Service Name"
    type: "informational|transactional|integrated"
    channel: "web|mobile|kiosk|in-person"
    digital_adoption: 45
assessment_scope:
  - "Service delivery"
  - "Infrastructure"
  - "Data & analytics"
  - "Citizen engagement"
  - "Governance"
benchmarks:
  - "UN E-Government Development Index"
  - "OECD Digital Government Index"

E-Government Maturity Framework

UN EGDI Maturity Stages

Stage	Name	Characteristics
1	Emerging	Basic web presence, limited info
2	Enhanced	More content, simple forms
3	Transactional	Online transactions, secure services
4	Connected	Integrated, proactive, personalized

Assessment Dimensions

Dimension	Focus Areas	Weight
Online Services	Service availability, user experience	30%
Infrastructure	Technology, connectivity, cloud	20%
Human Capital	Digital skills, IT workforce	15%
Citizen Engagement	Participation, feedback, co-creation	15%
Data & Analytics	Open data, data-driven decisions	10%
Governance	Strategy, policies, cybersecurity	10%

Output: E-Government Assessment Report

# E-Government Maturity Assessment
## [Government Entity Name]
### Assessment Date: [Date]

## Executive Summary

**Overall Maturity Level:** [Stage 1-4] - [Name]
**Overall Score:** [X/100]
**Key Strengths:** [Count]
**Critical Gaps:** [Count]
**Recommended Priority Actions:** [Count]

## Entity Profile

| Attribute | Value |
|-----------|-------|
| Government Level | [Level] |
| Population Served | [Number] |
| Current Services | [Count] |
| Digital Adoption Rate | [%] |
| IT Budget | $[Amount] |
| IT Staff | [Count] |

## Maturity Assessment

### Overall Maturity Score

Stage 4 (Connected) │░░░░░░░░░░│ Stage 3 (Transactional)│████████░░│ ◄── Current: 3.2 Stage 2 (Enhanced) │██████████│ Stage 1 (Emerging) │██████████│ 0 50 100

### Dimension Scores

| Dimension | Score | Level | Benchmark | Gap |
|-----------|-------|-------|-----------|-----|
| Online Services | [X/100] | [Stage] | [Benchmark] | [+/-] |
| Infrastructure | [X/100] | [Stage] | [Benchmark] | [+/-] |
| Human Capital | [X/100] | [Stage] | [Benchmark] | [+/-] |
| Citizen Engagement | [X/100] | [Stage] | [Benchmark] | [+/-] |
| Data & Analytics | [X/100] | [Stage] | [Benchmark] | [+/-] |
| Governance | [X/100] | [Stage] | [Benchmark] | [+/-] |

## Detailed Findings

### Online Services Assessment

#### Service Inventory
| Service | Type | Channel | Adoption | Score |
|---------|------|---------|----------|-------|
| [Service] | [Type] | [Channel] | [%] | [X/10] |

#### Service Gaps
| Gap | Impact | Priority |
|-----|--------|----------|
| [Gap] | [Impact] | [H/M/L] |

### Infrastructure Assessment

| Component | Status | Finding |
|-----------|--------|---------|
| Cloud Adoption | [%] | [Finding] |
| Network Coverage | [%] | [Finding] |
| Cybersecurity | [Score] | [Finding] |
| Interoperability | [Score] | [Finding] |

### Citizen Engagement Assessment

| Channel | Usage | Effectiveness |
|---------|-------|---------------|
| Website | [Visits/mo] | [Score] |
| Mobile App | [Downloads] | [Score] |
| Social Media | [Followers] | [Score] |
| Contact Center | [Calls/mo] | [Score] |

## Benchmarking

### Comparison to Peers
| Entity | Overall Score | Services | Infrastructure |
|--------|---------------|----------|----------------|
| [This Entity] | [Score] | [Score] | [Score] |
| [Peer 1] | [Score] | [Score] | [Score] |
| [Peer 2] | [Score] | [Score] | [Score] |

### International Benchmark
| Index | Score | Ranking | Percentile |
|-------|-------|---------|------------|
| UN EGDI | [Score] | [Rank] | [%] |
| OECD DGI | [Score] | [Rank] | [%] |

## Recommendations

### Quick Wins (0-6 months)
| # | Recommendation | Impact | Effort | Dimension |
|---|----------------|--------|--------|-----------|
| 1 | [Recommendation] | [H/M/L] | [H/M/L] | [Dim] |

### Strategic Initiatives (6-18 months)
| # | Recommendation | Impact | Effort | Dimension |
|---|----------------|--------|--------|-----------|
| 1 | [Recommendation] | [H/M/L] | [H/M/L] | [Dim] |

### Transformational (18+ months)
| # | Recommendation | Impact | Effort | Dimension |
|---|----------------|--------|--------|-----------|
| 1 | [Recommendation] | [H/M/L] | [H/M/L] | [Dim] |

## Digital Transformation Roadmap

### Phase 1: Foundation (Year 1)
- [Initiative]
- [Initiative]

### Phase 2: Enhancement (Year 2)
- [Initiative]
- [Initiative]

### Phase 3: Optimization (Year 3+)
- [Initiative]
- [Initiative]

## Investment Requirements

| Category | Year 1 | Year 2 | Year 3 | Total |
|----------|--------|--------|--------|-------|
| Infrastructure | $[X] | $[X] | $[X] | $[X] |
| Applications | $[X] | $[X] | $[X] | $[X] |
| Training | $[X] | $[X] | $[X] | $[X] |
| **Total** | $[X] | $[X] | $[X] | $[X] |

---

Skill 2: Citizen Service Blueprint

Command: /gov-citizen-svc

Purpose

Design citizen-centric service delivery models that improve service quality, accessibility, and efficiency across channels.

Inputs Required

service_scope: "single|multiple|enterprise"
services_in_scope:
  - name: "Service Name"
    current_channels: ["in-person", "phone"]
    volume_annual: 50000
    avg_processing_time: "5 days"
    satisfaction_score: 3.2
citizen_segments:
  - "General public"
  - "Businesses"
  - "Seniors"
  - "Non-English speakers"
improvement_goals:
  - "Reduce processing time"
  - "Improve satisfaction"
  - "Increase digital adoption"
constraints:
  budget: 500000
  timeline_months: 18

Citizen Service Design Framework

Service Design Principles

Principle	Description	Application
Citizen-Centric	Design around citizen needs	User research, personas
Once-Only	Don't ask for info already known	Data sharing, integration
Digital by Default	Digital first, alternatives available	Multi-channel approach
Accessibility	Usable by everyone	WCAG compliance
Transparency	Clear status, expectations	Tracking, communication
Privacy by Design	Protect citizen data	Data minimization

Service Delivery Channels

Channel	Use Cases	Citizen Preference
Digital Portal	Transactions, info, tracking	High volume, routine
Mobile App	On-the-go, notifications	Younger demographics
Contact Center	Complex, emotional	Immediate assistance
In-Person	High-value, vulnerable	Personal interaction
Chatbot/AI	FAQ, simple queries	24/7 availability

Output: Citizen Service Blueprint

# Citizen Service Blueprint
## [Service Name]
### Version: 1.0 | Date: [Date]

## Service Overview

| Attribute | Current | Target |
|-----------|---------|--------|
| Annual Volume | [Count] | [Count] |
| Processing Time | [Time] | [Time] |
| Cost per Transaction | $[X] | $[X] |
| Satisfaction Score | [Score]/5 | [Score]/5 |
| Digital Adoption | [%] | [%] |

## Citizen Journey

### Persona: [Persona Name]
| Attribute | Value |
|-----------|-------|
| Age | [Range] |
| Tech Savvy | [Low/Medium/High] |
| Channel Preference | [Channel] |
| Goals | [Goals] |
| Pain Points | [Pain points] |

### Current Journey Map

| Stage | Citizen Action | Touchpoint | Emotion | Pain Points |
|-------|----------------|------------|---------|-------------|
| Awareness | Learns of need | [Touch] | [Emotion] | [Pain] |
| Research | Finds requirements | [Touch] | [Emotion] | [Pain] |
| Application | Submits request | [Touch] | [Emotion] | [Pain] |
| Processing | Waits for decision | [Touch] | [Emotion] | [Pain] |
| Resolution | Receives outcome | [Touch] | [Emotion] | [Pain] |
| Follow-up | Questions/appeals | [Touch] | [Emotion] | [Pain] |

### Future Journey Map

| Stage | Citizen Action | Touchpoint | Improvement |
|-------|----------------|------------|-------------|
| Awareness | Proactive notification | Push notification | Pre-emptive service |
| Research | Self-service portal | Website | Clear requirements |
| Application | Online submission | Portal | Digital forms |
| Processing | Real-time tracking | Portal/SMS | Transparency |
| Resolution | Digital delivery | Portal/Email | Instant outcome |
| Follow-up | Self-service FAQ | Chatbot | 24/7 support |

## Service Blueprint

### Front Stage (Citizen-Facing)

┌─────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┐ │ CITIZEN ACTIONS │ ├─────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┤ │ Visit → Search → Start → Fill → Upload → Submit → Track │ │ Portal Info App Form Docs App Status │ └─────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┘ │ │ │ │ │ │ ┌─────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┐ │ LINE OF INTERACTION │ ├─────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┤ │ FRONT STAGE (Visible to Citizen) │ │ Portal Search Account Forms Upload Submit Dashboard │ │ UI Results Auth UI Handler Confirm Tracker │ └─────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┘ │ │ │ │ │ │ ┌─────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┐ │ LINE OF VISIBILITY │ ├─────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┤ │ BACK STAGE (Not Visible) │ │ CMS Index IAM Forms Storage Queue Status │ │ Content Search AuthN Engine S3/Blob Manager Engine │ └─────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┘ │ │ │ │ │ │ ┌─────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┐ │ SUPPORT PROCESSES │ │ Data Verification │ Rules Engine │ Case Mgmt │ Analytics │ │ External Systems │ Workflow │ Reporting │ Audit │ └─────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┘

### Channel Strategy

| Channel | Services | Target Users | Hours |
|---------|----------|--------------|-------|
| Portal | All | All citizens | 24/7 |
| Mobile | High-volume | Mobile users | 24/7 |
| Phone | Complex, appeals | All | 8am-6pm |
| In-Person | Vulnerable, complex | Seniors, special needs | 9am-5pm |
| Chat | FAQ, simple | Digital-native | 24/7 (bot), 8am-8pm (agent) |

## Service Requirements

### Functional Requirements
| Req ID | Requirement | Priority |
|--------|-------------|----------|
| FR-001 | Online application submission | Must |
| FR-002 | Real-time status tracking | Must |
| FR-003 | Document upload capability | Must |
| FR-004 | Payment processing | Should |
| FR-005 | Appointment scheduling | Should |

### Non-Functional Requirements
| Requirement | Target |
|-------------|--------|
| Availability | 99.9% |
| Response Time | < 3 sec |
| Accessibility | WCAG 2.1 AA |
| Mobile Support | Responsive |
| Languages | [Languages] |

## Implementation Roadmap

### Phase 1: Digital Foundation (Months 1-6)
- Online portal development
- Basic application submission
- Account management

### Phase 2: Enhancement (Months 7-12)
- Status tracking
- Document management
- Payment integration

### Phase 3: Optimization (Months 13-18)
- AI-assisted processing
- Proactive notifications
- Continuous improvement

## Success Metrics

| Metric | Baseline | Target | Timeline |
|--------|----------|--------|----------|
| Processing Time | [Current] | [Target] | [Date] |
| Digital Adoption | [%] | [%] | [Date] |
| Satisfaction | [Score] | [Score] | [Date] |
| Cost per Transaction | $[X] | $[X] | [Date] |

---

Skill 3: Policy Analysis Framework

Command: /gov-policy

Purpose

Provide structured framework for analyzing policy implications, alternatives, and recommendations.

Inputs Required

policy_area: "Policy Area"
policy_type: "regulatory|legislative|administrative|program"
analysis_type: "ex-ante|ex-post|comparative"
stakeholders:
  - "Stakeholder Group 1"
  - "Stakeholder Group 2"
policy_question: "What is the key policy question?"
alternatives:
  - "Status quo"
  - "Alternative 1"
  - "Alternative 2"
evaluation_criteria:
  - "Effectiveness"
  - "Efficiency"
  - "Equity"
  - "Feasibility"

Policy Analysis Framework

Policy Analysis Steps

Step	Description	Output
1. Define Problem	Clarify the issue	Problem statement
2. Assemble Evidence	Research and data	Evidence base
3. Construct Alternatives	Policy options	Options matrix
4. Select Criteria	Evaluation standards	Criteria weights
5. Predict Outcomes	Impact assessment	Projections
6. Confront Tradeoffs	Compare options	Tradeoff matrix
7. Decide	Recommendation	Decision memo
8. Tell Your Story	Communication	Policy brief

Evaluation Criteria

Criterion	Description	Measures
Effectiveness	Achieves objectives	Goal attainment
Efficiency	Cost-benefit ratio	ROI, cost per outcome
Equity	Fair distribution	Impact on groups
Feasibility	Can be implemented	Political, technical
Sustainability	Long-term viability	Resource requirements

Output: Policy Analysis Report

# Policy Analysis Report
## [Policy Title]
### Date: [Date]

## Executive Summary

**Policy Question:** [Question]
**Recommendation:** [Recommended alternative]
**Key Finding:** [Main insight]

## 1. Problem Definition

### Problem Statement
[Clear, concise statement of the problem]

### Problem Magnitude
| Indicator | Value | Trend |
|-----------|-------|-------|
| [Indicator] | [Value] | [↑↓→] |

### Root Causes
1. [Cause 1]
2. [Cause 2]

### Who is Affected
| Group | Impact | Size |
|-------|--------|------|
| [Group] | [Impact] | [#] |

## 2. Evidence Base

### Data Sources
| Source | Type | Relevance |
|--------|------|-----------|
| [Source] | [Type] | [H/M/L] |

### Key Statistics
| Statistic | Value | Source |
|-----------|-------|--------|
| [Stat] | [Value] | [Source] |

### Research Findings
| Study | Finding | Strength |
|-------|---------|----------|
| [Study] | [Finding] | [Strong/Moderate/Weak] |

## 3. Policy Alternatives

### Alternative A: Status Quo
**Description:** [Current approach]
**Mechanism:** [How it works]
**Expected Outcomes:** [Outcomes]

### Alternative B: [Name]
**Description:** [Approach]
**Mechanism:** [How it works]
**Expected Outcomes:** [Outcomes]

### Alternative C: [Name]
**Description:** [Approach]
**Mechanism:** [How it works]
**Expected Outcomes:** [Outcomes]

## 4. Evaluation Criteria

| Criterion | Weight | Definition |
|-----------|--------|------------|
| Effectiveness | 30% | [Definition] |
| Efficiency | 25% | [Definition] |
| Equity | 20% | [Definition] |
| Feasibility | 15% | [Definition] |
| Sustainability | 10% | [Definition] |

## 5. Analysis of Alternatives

### Effectiveness Analysis
| Alternative | Score | Evidence |
|-------------|-------|----------|
| A: Status Quo | [X/10] | [Evidence] |
| B: [Name] | [X/10] | [Evidence] |
| C: [Name] | [X/10] | [Evidence] |

### Cost-Benefit Analysis
| Alternative | Costs | Benefits | Net Benefit | B/C Ratio |
|-------------|-------|----------|-------------|-----------|
| A | $[X] | $[X] | $[X] | [X] |
| B | $[X] | $[X] | $[X] | [X] |
| C | $[X] | $[X] | $[X] | [X] |

### Equity Analysis
| Alternative | Impact on [Group 1] | Impact on [Group 2] |
|-------------|---------------------|---------------------|
| A | [Impact] | [Impact] |
| B | [Impact] | [Impact] |
| C | [Impact] | [Impact] |

### Feasibility Analysis
| Alternative | Political | Technical | Administrative | Financial |
|-------------|-----------|-----------|----------------|-----------|
| A | [H/M/L] | [H/M/L] | [H/M/L] | [H/M/L] |
| B | [H/M/L] | [H/M/L] | [H/M/L] | [H/M/L] |
| C | [H/M/L] | [H/M/L] | [H/M/L] | [H/M/L] |

## 6. Tradeoff Matrix

| Alternative | Effect. | Effic. | Equity | Feas. | Sust. | **Total** |
|-------------|---------|--------|--------|-------|-------|-----------|
| Weight | 30% | 25% | 20% | 15% | 10% | 100% |
| A: Status Quo | [X] | [X] | [X] | [X] | [X] | **[X]** |
| B: [Name] | [X] | [X] | [X] | [X] | [X] | **[X]** |
| C: [Name] | [X] | [X] | [X] | [X] | [X] | **[X]** |

## 7. Recommendation

### Recommended Alternative: [Name]

**Rationale:**
1. [Reason 1]
2. [Reason 2]
3. [Reason 3]

**Implementation Considerations:**
- [Consideration 1]
- [Consideration 2]

**Risks and Mitigations:**
| Risk | Likelihood | Impact | Mitigation |
|------|------------|--------|------------|
| [Risk] | [H/M/L] | [H/M/L] | [Action] |

## 8. Implementation Plan

| Phase | Activities | Timeline | Resources |
|-------|------------|----------|-----------|
| Design | [Activities] | [Time] | [Resources] |
| Pilot | [Activities] | [Time] | [Resources] |
| Rollout | [Activities] | [Time] | [Resources] |
| Evaluation | [Activities] | [Time] | [Resources] |

## Appendices

### A. Stakeholder Analysis
| Stakeholder | Interest | Position | Influence |
|-------------|----------|----------|-----------|
| [Stakeholder] | [Interest] | [Support/Oppose] | [H/M/L] |

### B. Assumptions and Limitations
- [Assumption/Limitation]

---

Skill 4: Transparency Audit

Command: /gov-transparency

Purpose

Audit government transparency practices including open data, FOIA compliance, public meetings, and proactive disclosure.

Inputs Required

entity_name: "Government Entity"
audit_scope:
  - "Open data"
  - "FOIA/Public records"
  - "Public meetings"
  - "Financial transparency"
  - "Proactive disclosure"
current_practices:
  open_data_portal: true|false
  foia_online: true|false
  meeting_recordings: true|false
  budget_transparency: "basic|detailed|comprehensive"
benchmarks:
  - "Open Government Partnership"
  - "Sunshine Laws"
  - "FOIA Best Practices"

Transparency Assessment Framework

Transparency Dimensions

Dimension	Focus	Examples
Proactive Disclosure	Publish without request	Policies, budgets, contracts
Reactive Disclosure	Respond to requests	FOIA, public records
Open Data	Machine-readable data	Datasets, APIs
Participatory	Citizen involvement	Public comment, meetings
Accountability	Performance tracking	Metrics, audits, reports

Output: Transparency Audit Report

# Government Transparency Audit
## [Entity Name]
### Audit Date: [Date]

## Executive Summary

**Overall Transparency Score:** [X/100]
**Rating:** [Exemplary|Strong|Adequate|Needs Improvement|Poor]
**Key Strengths:** [List]
**Critical Gaps:** [List]

## Audit Scope

| Dimension | Included | Weight |
|-----------|----------|--------|
| Proactive Disclosure | ✓ | 25% |
| FOIA/Public Records | ✓ | 25% |
| Open Data | ✓ | 20% |
| Public Meetings | ✓ | 15% |
| Financial Transparency | ✓ | 15% |

## Detailed Findings

### Proactive Disclosure (Score: X/100)

#### Required Disclosures
| Item | Status | Quality | Location |
|------|--------|---------|----------|
| Organizational chart | [Yes/No] | [H/M/L] | [URL] |
| Contact information | [Yes/No] | [H/M/L] | [URL] |
| Policies & procedures | [Yes/No] | [H/M/L] | [URL] |
| Annual reports | [Yes/No] | [H/M/L] | [URL] |
| Budget documents | [Yes/No] | [H/M/L] | [URL] |
| Contract awards | [Yes/No] | [H/M/L] | [URL] |
| Meeting minutes | [Yes/No] | [H/M/L] | [URL] |

### FOIA/Public Records (Score: X/100)

#### Process Assessment
| Criterion | Status | Finding |
|-----------|--------|---------|
| Online request submission | [Yes/No] | [Finding] |
| Request tracking | [Yes/No] | [Finding] |
| Response timeliness | [X days avg] | [vs. requirement] |
| Fee transparency | [Yes/No] | [Finding] |
| Appeal process | [Clear/Unclear] | [Finding] |

#### Performance Metrics
| Metric | Value | Benchmark |
|--------|-------|-----------|
| Requests received | [#] | N/A |
| Average response time | [Days] | [Requirement] |
| Requests granted | [%] | > 80% |
| Requests denied | [%] | < 15% |
| Appeals | [#] | Minimal |

### Open Data (Score: X/100)

#### Open Data Portal
| Criterion | Status | Finding |
|-----------|--------|---------|
| Portal exists | [Yes/No] | [URL] |
| Dataset count | [#] | [Benchmark] |
| Update frequency | [Frequency] | [Assessment] |
| Machine-readable formats | [%] | > 80% |
| API availability | [Yes/No] | [Finding] |
| License clarity | [Clear/Unclear] | [Finding] |

#### High-Value Datasets
| Dataset | Available | Format | Quality |
|---------|-----------|--------|---------|
| Budget | [Yes/No] | [Format] | [H/M/L] |
| Spending | [Yes/No] | [Format] | [H/M/L] |
| Contracts | [Yes/No] | [Format] | [H/M/L] |
| Permits | [Yes/No] | [Format] | [H/M/L] |
| Crime | [Yes/No] | [Format] | [H/M/L] |

### Public Meetings (Score: X/100)

| Criterion | Status | Finding |
|-----------|--------|---------|
| Meeting notices published | [Yes/No] | [Timing] |
| Agendas available in advance | [Yes/No] | [Timing] |
| Minutes published | [Yes/No] | [Timing] |
| Recordings available | [Yes/No] | [Format] |
| Remote participation | [Yes/No] | [Method] |
| Public comment period | [Yes/No] | [Process] |

### Financial Transparency (Score: X/100)

| Criterion | Status | Finding |
|-----------|--------|---------|
| Budget published | [Yes/No] | [Detail level] |
| Checkbook-level spending | [Yes/No] | [Finding] |
| Vendor payments | [Yes/No] | [Finding] |
| Salary information | [Yes/No] | [Finding] |
| Audit reports | [Yes/No] | [Finding] |
| Pension/benefit data | [Yes/No] | [Finding] |

## Benchmarking

### Comparison to Standards
| Standard | Score | Gap |
|----------|-------|-----|
| Open Government Partnership | [X/100] | [+/-] |
| Sunshine Index | [X/100] | [+/-] |
| FOIA Best Practices | [X/100] | [+/-] |

## Recommendations

### High Priority
| # | Recommendation | Impact | Effort |
|---|----------------|--------|--------|
| 1 | [Recommendation] | [H/M/L] | [H/M/L] |

### Medium Priority
| # | Recommendation | Impact | Effort |
|---|----------------|--------|--------|
| 1 | [Recommendation] | [H/M/L] | [H/M/L] |

## Improvement Roadmap

| Phase | Focus | Timeline |
|-------|-------|----------|
| 1 | FOIA process improvements | 0-6 months |
| 2 | Open data expansion | 6-12 months |
| 3 | Proactive disclosure | 12-18 months |

---

Skill 5: Section 508 Compliance

Command: /gov-508

Purpose

Verify compliance with Section 508 of the Rehabilitation Act and WCAG 2.1 accessibility standards for government digital content.

Inputs Required

assessment_scope:
  - "Websites"
  - "Mobile applications"
  - "Documents"
  - "Software applications"
  - "Kiosks"
assets_in_scope:
  - url: "https://example.gov"
    type: "website"
  - name: "Mobile App"
    type: "mobile"
compliance_level: "WCAG 2.1 AA"
testing_approach:
  - "Automated scanning"
  - "Manual testing"
  - "Assistive technology testing"

Section 508 Framework

WCAG 2.1 Principles (POUR)

Principle	Description	Guidelines
Perceivable	Info presentable to users	Text alternatives, captions, adaptable
Operable	UI navigable	Keyboard, time, seizures, navigable
Understandable	Info understandable	Readable, predictable, input assist
Robust	Compatible with tech	Parsing, name/role/value

WCAG 2.1 Level AA Requirements

Guideline	Criteria Count
1.1 Text Alternatives	1
1.2 Time-based Media	5
1.3 Adaptable	5
1.4 Distinguishable	10
2.1 Keyboard Accessible	4
2.2 Enough Time	2
2.3 Seizures	1
2.4 Navigable	7
2.5 Input Modalities	4
3.1 Readable	2
3.2 Predictable	3
3.3 Input Assistance	4
4.1 Compatible	2

Output: Section 508 Compliance Report

# Section 508 Accessibility Assessment
## [Entity Name]
### Assessment Date: [Date]

## Executive Summary

**Overall Compliance Level:** [Full|Substantial|Partial|Non-Compliant]
**WCAG 2.1 AA Conformance:** [%]
**Critical Issues:** [Count]
**Total Issues:** [Count]

## Assessment Scope

| Asset | Type | URL/Name |
|-------|------|----------|
| [Asset] | [Website/App/Doc] | [Location] |

## Compliance Summary

### By WCAG Principle
| Principle | Pass | Fail | % Compliant |
|-----------|------|------|-------------|
| Perceivable | [#] | [#] | [%] |
| Operable | [#] | [#] | [%] |
| Understandable | [#] | [#] | [%] |
| Robust | [#] | [#] | [%] |

### By Severity
| Severity | Count | Definition |
|----------|-------|------------|
| Critical | [#] | Blocks access completely |
| Serious | [#] | Significant barrier |
| Moderate | [#] | Some difficulty |
| Minor | [#] | Slight inconvenience |

## Detailed Findings

### Critical Issues
| # | Issue | WCAG | Location | Impact | Remediation |
|---|-------|------|----------|--------|-------------|
| 1 | [Issue] | [Criterion] | [Page/Element] | [Impact] | [Fix] |

### Serious Issues
| # | Issue | WCAG | Location | Impact | Remediation |
|---|-------|------|----------|--------|-------------|
| 1 | [Issue] | [Criterion] | [Page/Element] | [Impact] | [Fix] |

## Testing Results by Guideline

### 1. Perceivable

#### 1.1 Text Alternatives
| Criterion | Status | Issues Found |
|-----------|--------|--------------|
| 1.1.1 Non-text Content | [Pass/Fail] | [Count] |

**Issues:**
- [Issue description with location]

#### 1.2 Time-based Media
| Criterion | Status | Issues Found |
|-----------|--------|--------------|
| 1.2.1 Audio-only/Video-only | [Pass/Fail/N/A] | [Count] |
| 1.2.2 Captions | [Pass/Fail/N/A] | [Count] |
| 1.2.3 Audio Description | [Pass/Fail/N/A] | [Count] |

#### 1.3 Adaptable
| Criterion | Status | Issues Found |
|-----------|--------|--------------|
| 1.3.1 Info and Relationships | [Pass/Fail] | [Count] |
| 1.3.2 Meaningful Sequence | [Pass/Fail] | [Count] |
| 1.3.3 Sensory Characteristics | [Pass/Fail] | [Count] |

#### 1.4 Distinguishable
| Criterion | Status | Issues Found |
|-----------|--------|--------------|
| 1.4.1 Use of Color | [Pass/Fail] | [Count] |
| 1.4.3 Contrast (Minimum) | [Pass/Fail] | [Count] |
| 1.4.4 Resize Text | [Pass/Fail] | [Count] |
| 1.4.5 Images of Text | [Pass/Fail] | [Count] |

### 2. Operable

#### 2.1 Keyboard Accessible
| Criterion | Status | Issues Found |
|-----------|--------|--------------|
| 2.1.1 Keyboard | [Pass/Fail] | [Count] |
| 2.1.2 No Keyboard Trap | [Pass/Fail] | [Count] |

#### 2.4 Navigable
| Criterion | Status | Issues Found |
|-----------|--------|--------------|
| 2.4.1 Bypass Blocks | [Pass/Fail] | [Count] |
| 2.4.2 Page Titled | [Pass/Fail] | [Count] |
| 2.4.3 Focus Order | [Pass/Fail] | [Count] |
| 2.4.4 Link Purpose | [Pass/Fail] | [Count] |
| 2.4.6 Headings and Labels | [Pass/Fail] | [Count] |

### 3. Understandable

#### 3.1 Readable
| Criterion | Status | Issues Found |
|-----------|--------|--------------|
| 3.1.1 Language of Page | [Pass/Fail] | [Count] |
| 3.1.2 Language of Parts | [Pass/Fail] | [Count] |

#### 3.3 Input Assistance
| Criterion | Status | Issues Found |
|-----------|--------|--------------|
| 3.3.1 Error Identification | [Pass/Fail] | [Count] |
| 3.3.2 Labels or Instructions | [Pass/Fail] | [Count] |
| 3.3.3 Error Suggestion | [Pass/Fail] | [Count] |

### 4. Robust

#### 4.1 Compatible
| Criterion | Status | Issues Found |
|-----------|--------|--------------|
| 4.1.1 Parsing | [Pass/Fail] | [Count] |
| 4.1.2 Name, Role, Value | [Pass/Fail] | [Count] |

## Remediation Plan

### Immediate (Critical Issues)
| Issue | Fix | Owner | Due |
|-------|-----|-------|-----|
| [Issue] | [Action] | [Owner] | [Date] |

### Short-term (Serious Issues)
| Issue | Fix | Owner | Due |
|-------|-----|-------|-----|
| [Issue] | [Action] | [Owner] | [Date] |

### Medium-term (Moderate Issues)
| Issue | Fix | Owner | Due |
|-------|-----|-------|-----|
| [Issue] | [Action] | [Owner] | [Date] |

## Testing Methodology

### Tools Used
| Tool | Purpose |
|------|---------|
| [Tool] | [Purpose] |

### Manual Testing
| Test | Method |
|------|--------|
| Keyboard navigation | Tab through all interactive elements |
| Screen reader | NVDA/JAWS/VoiceOver testing |
| Color contrast | Manual verification of color pairs |

## Recommendations

### Process Improvements
1. [Recommendation]

### Training Needs
1. [Training topic]

### Governance
1. [Policy recommendation]

---

Skill 6: Procurement Support

Command: /gov-procurement

Purpose

Support government procurement processes including requirements development, RFP creation, evaluation criteria, and vendor selection.

Inputs Required

procurement_type: "goods|services|technology|construction"
estimated_value: 500000
procurement_method: "RFP|RFQ|IFB|sole_source"
timeline:
  rfp_release: "2026-03-01"
  proposals_due: "2026-04-15"
  award_target: "2026-06-01"
requirements_status: "draft|final"
evaluation_approach: "lowest_price|best_value|qualifications"

Output: Procurement Documentation

# Procurement Support Package
## [Project Name]
### Date: [Date]

## Procurement Summary

| Attribute | Value |
|-----------|-------|
| Procurement Type | [Type] |
| Estimated Value | $[Amount] |
| Method | [RFP/RFQ/IFB] |
| Contract Type | [Fixed/T&M/Cost Plus] |
| Contract Duration | [Duration] |

## Requirements Specification

### Scope of Work
[Detailed description of requirements]

### Technical Requirements
| Req ID | Requirement | Priority | Mandatory |
|--------|-------------|----------|-----------|
| TR-001 | [Requirement] | [H/M/L] | [Y/N] |

### Functional Requirements
| Req ID | Requirement | Priority | Mandatory |
|--------|-------------|----------|-----------|
| FR-001 | [Requirement] | [H/M/L] | [Y/N] |

### Performance Requirements
| Metric | Requirement | Measurement |
|--------|-------------|-------------|
| [Metric] | [Requirement] | [How measured] |

## Evaluation Criteria

### Technical Evaluation (XX points)
| Criterion | Points | Description |
|-----------|--------|-------------|
| Technical Approach | [#] | [Description] |
| Experience | [#] | [Description] |
| Past Performance | [#] | [Description] |
| Key Personnel | [#] | [Description] |

### Cost/Price Evaluation (XX points)
| Criterion | Points | Description |
|-----------|--------|-------------|
| Total Price | [#] | [Description] |
| Price Realism | [#] | [Description] |

### Evaluation Scoring Guide
| Score | Description |
|-------|-------------|
| 5 - Exceptional | Exceeds requirements, innovative |
| 4 - Good | Exceeds requirements |
| 3 - Acceptable | Meets requirements |
| 2 - Marginal | Partially meets requirements |
| 1 - Unacceptable | Does not meet requirements |

## RFP Outline

1. Introduction and Purpose
2. Background
3. Scope of Work
4. Technical Requirements
5. Proposal Instructions
6. Evaluation Criteria
7. Contract Terms
8. Attachments

## Procurement Timeline

| Milestone | Date |
|-----------|------|
| RFP Release | [Date] |
| Pre-Proposal Conference | [Date] |
| Questions Due | [Date] |
| Answers Posted | [Date] |
| Proposals Due | [Date] |
| Evaluation Period | [Dates] |
| Interviews (if needed) | [Dates] |
| Selection | [Date] |
| Contract Award | [Date] |
| Performance Start | [Date] |

---

Skill 7: Stakeholder Engagement

Command: /gov-stakeholder

Purpose

Plan and execute public stakeholder engagement for government initiatives including community meetings, public comment periods, and participatory processes.

Inputs Required

initiative_name: "Initiative Name"
engagement_purpose:
  - "Inform"
  - "Consult"
  - "Involve"
  - "Collaborate"
  - "Empower"
stakeholder_groups:
  - name: "Group Name"
    size: 5000
    interest: "high|medium|low"
    influence: "high|medium|low"
timeline:
  start: "2026-02-15"
  end: "2026-05-15"
engagement_methods:
  - "Public meetings"
  - "Online surveys"
  - "Focus groups"
constraints:
  budget: 50000
  languages: ["English", "Spanish"]

IAP2 Spectrum of Engagement

Level	Goal	Promise
Inform	Provide information	Keep you informed
Consult	Obtain feedback	Listen and acknowledge
Involve	Work with public	Reflect concerns in decisions
Collaborate	Partner in decisions	Incorporate advice
Empower	Place decision with public	Implement your decision

Output: Stakeholder Engagement Plan

# Stakeholder Engagement Plan
## [Initiative Name]
### Version: 1.0 | Date: [Date]

## Overview

### Initiative Summary
[Brief description of the initiative]

### Engagement Objectives
1. [Objective 1]
2. [Objective 2]

### IAP2 Level
**Primary Level:** [Inform/Consult/Involve/Collaborate/Empower]
**Promise to Stakeholders:** [Promise statement]

## Stakeholder Analysis

### Stakeholder Map

          High Influence
                │
Keep Satisfied  │  Key Players
     ┌──────────┼──────────┐
     │    ●A    │    ●B    │

Low │ │ │ High Interest ├──────────┼──────────┤ Interest │ ●C │ ●D │ │ Monitor │Keep Informed│ └──────────┼──────────┘ │ Low Influence

### Stakeholder Register
| Group | Interest | Influence | Engagement Level | Key Concerns |
|-------|----------|-----------|------------------|--------------|
| [Group] | [H/M/L] | [H/M/L] | [Level] | [Concerns] |

## Engagement Strategy

### By Stakeholder Group

| Group | Method | Frequency | Responsible |
|-------|--------|-----------|-------------|
| [Group] | [Methods] | [Frequency] | [Owner] |

### Engagement Methods

| Method | Description | Audience | Timeline |
|--------|-------------|----------|----------|
| Public Meetings | Town halls | General public | [Dates] |
| Online Survey | Web-based feedback | All | [Dates] |
| Focus Groups | Small group discussions | Targeted | [Dates] |
| Comment Period | Formal written comments | All | [Dates] |

## Engagement Schedule

| Activity | Date | Location | Target Audience |
|----------|------|----------|-----------------|
| [Activity] | [Date] | [Location] | [Audience] |

## Communication Plan

### Key Messages
1. [Message 1]
2. [Message 2]

### Communication Channels
| Channel | Audience | Content Type | Frequency |
|---------|----------|--------------|-----------|
| Website | All | Updates, materials | Ongoing |
| Email | Subscribers | Notices, updates | As needed |
| Social Media | Engaged public | Highlights, events | Weekly |
| Press Releases | Media | Major milestones | As needed |

## Feedback Management

### Input Collection
| Source | Method | Processing |
|--------|--------|------------|
| Meetings | Notes, recordings | Summarize, theme |
| Surveys | Online platform | Analyze, report |
| Comments | Written submissions | Categorize, respond |

### Response Commitment
- Acknowledge all input within [X] days
- Publish summary of input received
- Explain how input influenced decisions
- Provide final decision rationale

## Accessibility & Equity

### Language Access
| Language | Materials | Interpretation |
|----------|-----------|----------------|
| English | ✓ | ✓ |
| [Language] | ✓ | ✓ |

### Accessibility
- All venues ADA accessible
- Materials in accessible formats
- ASL interpretation available on request
- Virtual participation options

### Equity Considerations
- Meetings at varied times/locations
- Childcare provided at public meetings
- Transportation assistance available
- Targeted outreach to underserved communities

## Evaluation

### Success Metrics
| Metric | Target | Measurement |
|--------|--------|-------------|
| Meeting attendance | [#] | Headcount |
| Survey responses | [#] | Response count |
| Demographic representation | [%] | Survey demographics |
| Satisfaction with process | [Score] | Exit survey |

## Budget

| Item | Amount |
|------|--------|
| Meeting venues | $[X] |
| Materials/printing | $[X] |
| Translation/interpretation | $[X] |
| Online tools | $[X] |
| Outreach | $[X] |
| **Total** | $[X] |

## Roles & Responsibilities

| Role | Responsibilities | Person |
|------|------------------|--------|
| Project Lead | Overall coordination | [Name] |
| Communications | Messaging, outreach | [Name] |
| Logistics | Events, materials | [Name] |
| Analysis | Input processing | [Name] |

---

Skill 8: Regulatory Impact Assessment

Command: /gov-ria

Purpose

Conduct regulatory impact assessment (RIA) to evaluate the potential effects of proposed regulations on economy, society, and environment.

Inputs Required

regulation_title: "Regulation Title"
regulatory_agency: "Agency Name"
regulation_type: "new|amendment|repeal"
policy_objective: "Policy objective"
assessment_scope:
  - "Economic impact"
  - "Small business impact"
  - "Environmental impact"
  - "Social impact"
affected_entities:
  - "Businesses"
  - "Individuals"
  - "Government"
alternatives_considered:
  - "No action"
  - "Alternative 1"
  - "Alternative 2"

RIA Framework

RIA Components

Component	Purpose	Key Questions
Problem Definition	Why regulate?	What market failure?
Objectives	What to achieve?	Measurable outcomes?
Alternatives	Other options?	Regulatory vs non-regulatory
Impact Analysis	Who affected, how?	Costs, benefits, distribution
Consultation	Stakeholder input	Who consulted, what learned?
Recommendation	Best option	Justified selection

Output: Regulatory Impact Assessment

# Regulatory Impact Assessment
## [Regulation Title]
### Agency: [Agency Name]
### Date: [Date]

## Executive Summary

**Regulation:** [Title]
**Type:** [New/Amendment/Repeal]
**Recommendation:** [Proceed/Modify/Defer]
**Net Benefit:** $[Amount] over [Years]

## 1. Statement of Need

### Problem Definition
[Description of the problem requiring regulatory intervention]

### Market Failure
| Type | Description | Evidence |
|------|-------------|----------|
| [Type] | [Description] | [Evidence] |

### Current Situation
[Description of current regulatory environment]

### Consequences of Inaction
| Impact | Description | Magnitude |
|--------|-------------|-----------|
| [Impact] | [Description] | [H/M/L] |

## 2. Objectives

### Primary Objective
[Clear statement of regulatory objective]

### Secondary Objectives
1. [Objective]
2. [Objective]

### Performance Indicators
| Objective | Indicator | Baseline | Target |
|-----------|-----------|----------|--------|
| [Objective] | [Indicator] | [Current] | [Target] |

## 3. Regulatory Alternatives

### Alternative 0: No Action (Baseline)
**Description:** [Current state continues]
**Projected Outcomes:** [Outcomes]

### Alternative 1: [Name]
**Description:** [Approach]
**Mechanism:** [How it works]
**Expected Outcomes:** [Outcomes]

### Alternative 2: [Name]
**Description:** [Approach]
**Mechanism:** [How it works]
**Expected Outcomes:** [Outcomes]

### Alternative 3: Proposed Regulation
**Description:** [Proposed approach]
**Mechanism:** [How it works]
**Expected Outcomes:** [Outcomes]

## 4. Impact Analysis

### Economic Impact

#### Costs
| Category | Year 1 | Year 2-5 (Annual) | 10-Year Total |
|----------|--------|-------------------|---------------|
| Compliance costs | $[X] | $[X] | $[X] |
| Administrative costs | $[X] | $[X] | $[X] |
| Government costs | $[X] | $[X] | $[X] |
| **Total Costs** | $[X] | $[X] | $[X] |

#### Benefits
| Category | Year 1 | Year 2-5 (Annual) | 10-Year Total |
|----------|--------|-------------------|---------------|
| Health benefits | $[X] | $[X] | $[X] |
| Safety benefits | $[X] | $[X] | $[X] |
| Economic benefits | $[X] | $[X] | $[X] |
| **Total Benefits** | $[X] | $[X] | $[X] |

#### Net Impact
| Metric | Value |
|--------|-------|
| Net Present Value | $[X] |
| Benefit-Cost Ratio | [X]:1 |
| Break-even Year | Year [X] |

### Small Business Impact

| Impact Area | Number Affected | Cost per Entity | Total Cost |
|-------------|-----------------|-----------------|------------|
| Compliance | [#] | $[X] | $[X] |
| Reporting | [#] | $[X] | $[X] |
| Training | [#] | $[X] | $[X] |

**Small Business Flexibility Analysis:**
- [Alternative considered to reduce burden]
- [Exemption or tiered approach]

### Environmental Impact
| Impact | Direction | Magnitude | Evidence |
|--------|-----------|-----------|----------|
| [Impact] | [+/-] | [H/M/L] | [Source] |

### Social Impact
| Group | Impact | Direction | Magnitude |
|-------|--------|-----------|-----------|
| [Group] | [Impact] | [+/-] | [H/M/L] |

## 5. Alternative Comparison

| Criterion | Alt 0 | Alt 1 | Alt 2 | Alt 3 |
|-----------|-------|-------|-------|-------|
| Effectiveness | [Score] | [Score] | [Score] | [Score] |
| Efficiency | [Score] | [Score] | [Score] | [Score] |
| Equity | [Score] | [Score] | [Score] | [Score] |
| Feasibility | [Score] | [Score] | [Score] | [Score] |
| **Total** | [Score] | [Score] | [Score] | [Score] |

## 6. Consultation Summary

### Stakeholders Consulted
| Stakeholder | Method | Key Concerns |
|-------------|--------|--------------|
| [Stakeholder] | [Method] | [Concerns] |

### Input Received
| Theme | # Comments | Response |
|-------|------------|----------|
| [Theme] | [#] | [How addressed] |

## 7. Implementation & Enforcement

### Implementation Timeline
| Phase | Activities | Date |
|-------|------------|------|
| Publication | Final rule | [Date] |
| Effective | Rule takes effect | [Date] |
| Compliance | Full compliance required | [Date] |

### Enforcement Approach
| Violation | Consequence | Process |
|-----------|-------------|---------|
| [Violation] | [Consequence] | [Process] |

## 8. Monitoring & Evaluation

### Performance Metrics
| Metric | Baseline | Target | Frequency |
|--------|----------|--------|-----------|
| [Metric] | [Current] | [Target] | [Frequency] |

### Review Schedule
| Review | Date | Purpose |
|--------|------|---------|
| Implementation review | [Date] | Assess implementation |
| Impact evaluation | [Date] | Assess effectiveness |

## 9. Recommendation

**Recommended Alternative:** [Alternative #]

**Rationale:**
1. [Reason 1]
2. [Reason 2]
3. [Reason 3]

**Conditions/Caveats:**
- [Condition]

## Appendices

### A. Detailed Cost Calculations
### B. Stakeholder Comments
### C. Technical Analysis
### D. Legal Authority

---

Service Line Integration

Fee Modifier

GOV Base Modifier: 0.85 (government rate discount applied)

Typical Engagement Phases

Phase	Duration	Deliverables
Assessment	3-4 weeks	Current state, gap analysis
Design	4-6 weeks	Service blueprints, requirements
Implementation	Variable	System deployment, change mgmt
Evaluation	Ongoing	Performance monitoring, reporting

Cross-Skill Workflows

E-Government Transformation:
/gov-egov-assess → /dig-roadmap → /gov-citizen-svc →
/gov-508 → Implementation

Policy Development:
/gov-policy → /gov-stakeholder → /gov-ria →
/gov-transparency → Policy publication

Procurement Project:
/gov-procurement → /esi-vendor-eval → Contract award →
/gov-transparency (contract publication)

Accessibility Remediation:
/gov-508 → Remediation plan → Development →
/gov-508 (verification) → Compliance certification

Integration with Other Service Lines

Service Line	Integration Point
DIG	Digital government transformation
ESI	Government system integration
COE	Government performance dashboards
ISO	Government quality/security management
EDU	Education department projects
HLT	Health department projects

---

Regulatory Reference

Key Government Regulations/Standards

Regulation/Standard	Focus	Applicability
Section 508	Accessibility	Federal, contractors
FOIA	Public records	Federal, state equivalents
Privacy Act	Personal data	Federal agencies
FAR/DFAR	Procurement	Federal contracts
ADA	Accessibility	All government
Open Government	Transparency	Federal, state
Sunshine Laws	Public meetings	State/local

International Standards

Standard	Focus	Organization
UN EGDI	E-government maturity	United Nations
OGP	Open government	Open Government Partnership
OECD DGI	Digital government	OECD
ISO 37001	Anti-bribery	ISO

---

Templates & Artifacts

All GOV deliverables should use standard CPS branding via:

• /doc-gen for document generation
• assets/cps-branding.json for styling
• scripts/cps-document-generator.js for automation

Standard Artifacts by Skill

Skill	Primary Artifact	Format
/gov-egov-assess	E-Government Assessment	DOCX/PDF
/gov-citizen-svc	Service Blueprint	DOCX/PPTX
/gov-policy	Policy Analysis Report	DOCX/PDF
/gov-transparency	Transparency Audit	DOCX/PDF
/gov-508	Accessibility Assessment	DOCX/PDF
/gov-procurement	RFP/Procurement Package	DOCX
/gov-stakeholder	Engagement Plan	DOCX/PDF
/gov-ria	Regulatory Impact Assessment	DOCX/PDF