From fuse-ai-pilot
Code quality validation with linters, SOLID principles, DRY detection, error detection, and architecture compliance across all languages.
How this skill is triggered — by the user, by Claude, or both
Slash command
/fuse-ai-pilot:code-qualityThe summary Claude sees in its skill listing — used to decide when to auto-load this skill
```
PHASE 1: Exploration (explore-codebase) → BLOCKER
PHASE 2: Documentation (research-expert) → BLOCKER
PHASE 3: Impact Analysis (Grep usages) → BLOCKER
PHASE 3.5: DRY Detection (jscpd duplication) → NON-BLOCKING
PHASE 4: Error Detection (linters)
PHASE 5: Precision Correction (with docs + impact + DRY)
PHASE 6: Verification (re-run linters, tests, duplication)
CRITICAL: Phases 1-3 are BLOCKERS. Never skip them. DRY: Phase 3.5 is non-blocking but findings inform Phase 5 corrections.
Launch explore-codebase agent FIRST:
> Agent(subagent_type="fuse-ai-pilot:explore-codebase", prompt="...")
Gather:
Launch research-expert agent:
> Agent(subagent_type="fuse-ai-pilot:research-expert", prompt="Verify [library/framework] documentation for [error type]. Find [language] best practices for [specific issue].")
Request for each error:
For EACH element to modify: Grep usages → assess risk → document impact.
| Risk | Criteria | Action |
|---|---|---|
| 🟢 LOW | Internal, 0-1 usages | Proceed |
| 🟡 MEDIUM | 2-5 usages, compatible | Proceed with care |
| 🔴 HIGH | 5+ usages OR breaking | Flag to user FIRST |
Tool: jscpd — 150+ languages — npx jscpd ./src --threshold 5 --reporters console,json
| Level | Threshold | Action |
|---|---|---|
| 🟢 Excellent | < 3% | No action needed |
| 🟡 Good | 3-5% | Document, fix if time |
| 🟠 Acceptable | 5-10% | Extract shared logic |
| 🔴 Critical | > 10% | Mandatory refactoring |
See references/duplication-thresholds.md for per-language thresholds, config, and extraction patterns. See references/linter-commands.md for language-specific jscpd commands.
See references/linter-commands.md for language-specific commands.
| Priority | Type | Examples | Action |
|---|---|---|---|
| Critical | Security | SQL injection, XSS, CSRF, auth bypass | Fix IMMEDIATELY |
| High | Logic | SOLID violations, memory leaks, race conditions | Fix same session |
| High | DRY | Code duplication > 10%, copy-paste logic blocks | Mandatory refactoring |
| Medium | DRY | Code duplication 5-10%, repeated patterns | Extract shared logic |
| Medium | Performance | N+1 queries, deprecated APIs, inefficient algorithms | Fix if time |
| Low | Style | Formatting, naming, missing docs | Fix if time |
See references/solid-validation.md for S-O-L-I-D detection patterns and fix examples.
See references/file-size-rules.md for LoC limits, calculation, and split strategies.
See references/architecture-patterns.md for project structures and patterns.
See references/validation-report.md for the complete sniper report template.
See references/examples.md for detailed walkthrough.
npx claudepluginhub fusengine/agents --plugin fuse-ai-pilotRefines code quality by analyzing duplication, algorithmic efficiency, clean code violations, architectural fit, anti-slop patterns, and error handling. Use after AI sprints, before releases, or for refactoring existing code.
Reviews code for quality issues: architecture conformance, anti-patterns, performance, maintainability. Read-only analysis, never modifies code.
Verifies codebase quality by reviewing architecture consistency, convention compliance, and performing gap analysis. Activates on code review or quality checks.