lector

Lector — Academic Writing Review

Near-final self-review of CS academic writing. Checks writing and presentation only — not scientific content, not academic integrity.

Language: American English
Discipline: Computer science only
Stage: Near-final (not early-draft restructuring)

Entry Flow

1. Ask: Document type — paper / master's thesis / PhD thesis
2. Ask: Document input — file path (you read it) or pasted text
3. Read the full document
4. Dispatch 4 subagents in parallel using the Agent tool:
   • Language agent → skills/lector/language-agent.md
   • Structure agent → skills/lector/structure-agent.md
   • Elements agent → skills/lector/elements-agent.md
   • References agent → skills/lector/references-agent.md
5. Pass to each agent: full document text + document type
6. Assign global IDs: concatenate the four subagent tables in fixed order — Language → Structure → Elements → References — and number rows sequentially starting at 1. IDs are unique across the whole report; do not reset per agent.
7. Produce the consolidated report below.

Consolidated Report Format

Each agent gets its own titled section with a finding count and a single markdown table. If an agent reported no findings, keep the section header with (0 findings) and write No findings. instead of a table.

# Lector Review — [Document Title or Filename]
Document type: [Paper / Master's Thesis / PhD Thesis]
Reviewed: [date]

## Language & Style (N findings)
| ID | Location | Category | Finding | Zobel |
|----|----------|----------|---------|-------|
| 1  | §2.1 | Economy | "in order to" → "to" | Ch. 3 |
| 2  | §3   | Register | "we feel that the results are good" → "the results improve X by Y%" | Ch. 2 |

## Structure (N findings)
| ID | Location | Category | Finding | Zobel |
|----|----------|----------|---------|-------|
| 3  | Introduction | Ordering | motivation after method → move motivation before method | Ch. 7 |

## Elements (N findings)
| ID | Location | Category | Finding | Zobel |
|----|----------|----------|---------|-------|
| 4  | Fig. 2 | Caption | caption "Results" → state what is shown and the takeaway | Ch. 11 |

## References (N findings)
| ID | Location | Category | Finding | Zobel |
|----|----------|----------|---------|-------|
| 5  | [Smith24] | Missing entry | cited in §3 but absent from reference list → add bibliography entry | Ch. 6 |

## Summary
Total findings: N (Language: a | Structure: b | Elements: c | References: d)
Priority items: #2, #5, … — one-line reason per ID

Finding Format

Subagents emit rows of | Location | Category | Finding | Zobel |. The coordinator prepends an ID column with sequential global integers.

Out of Scope

• Scientific content quality (methodology, evaluation soundness, contribution novelty)
• Academic integrity / plagiarism detection
• LaTeX/tool-specific formatting issues (overfull hboxes, etc.)
• Non-CS academic disciplines
• Early-draft structural rethinking