From weft
Propose a weft workflow from conversation context. Scans skills, identifies gaps, builds template with loops.
How this skill is triggered — by the user, by Claude, or both
Slash command
/weft:wf-compose [description] [--from template-name][description] [--from template-name]This skill is limited to the following tools:
The summary Claude sees in its skill listing — used to decide when to auto-load this skill
Read the conversation context, scan available skills, identify gaps, and propose a v2 workflow template with loops and skill blocks.
Read the conversation context, scan available skills, identify gaps, and propose a v2 workflow template with loops and skill blocks.
$ARGUMENTS
| Usage | Behavior |
|---|---|
/wf-compose "review, fix, iterate until clean" | One-shot: propose from description |
/wf-compose (no args) | Interactive: ask "What are you trying to accomplish?" |
/wf-compose --from feature-workflow | Start from existing template, modify based on context |
Understand what the user is trying to do:
git branch --show-current 2>/dev/null
git diff --stat 2>/dev/null | tail -5
python3 "${CLAUDE_PLUGIN_ROOT}/core/cli.py" status 2>/dev/null
--from <template> was provided, load it as the starting point:
python3 "${CLAUDE_PLUGIN_ROOT}/core/cli.py" preview <template>
Build a map of what skills are available:
cat "${CLAUDE_SKILLS_REGISTRY:-$HOME/.claude/skills-registry.json}" 2>/dev/null
python3 "${CLAUDE_PLUGIN_ROOT}/core/cli.py" start
Compare what the user described against available skills:
Missing skill: /devils-advocate
Options:
1. Create a stub skill (I'll generate a skeleton)
2. Use /staff-review instead (similar purpose)
3. Skip this step
Build a v2 template JSON:
Map each step in the user's described workflow to a template step.
For each step, set:
name: kebab-case identifierskill: the matching skill name (e.g., "/staff-review"), or null if manualon_fail: "retry" for review/test steps, "block" for critical gates, "continue" for optional stepsguards: add logical guards (e.g., no git push before review)description: one-line summary of what the step doesFor iterative segments (user said "until", "repeat", "loop", "iterate"):
loop_back_to on the last step of the loop, pointing to the firstmax_iterations (default 3, or what the user specified)exit_condition from the user's description (natural language)Add schema_version: 2 to the template root.
Show the proposed workflow in two formats:
Draw the workflow as a flow diagram showing loops:
┌────────────┐ ┌───────────────┐ ┌─────────────┐
│ review │────>│ fix-issues │────>│ run-tests │
│ /staff-rev │ │ /fix-polish │ │ │
└────────────┘ └───────────────┘ └──────┬──────┘
^ │
│ ↻ until clean (max 3) │
└─────────────────────────────────────────┘
│ done
v
┌─────────────┐
│ ship │
│ /pr-ready │
└─────────────┘
For linear segments, use a simple arrow chain:
setup ──> plan ──> implement ──> verify
Show the full template JSON, formatted for readability.
Ask the user:
Approve this workflow? (approve / edit / cancel)
- approve: Save template and optionally start it
- edit: Describe what to change
- cancel: Discard
On approve:
echo '<json>' | python3 "${CLAUDE_PLUGIN_ROOT}/core/cli.py" save-template
/wf-start <template-name>On edit:
On cancel:
skill field. This is metadata — Claude reads it from context.md and knows which skill to invoke.loop_back_to on the last step of the repeating segment. The state machine handles the rest.exit_condition is evaluated by Claude (natural language), not by scripts. Keep conditions specific and observable: "no MEDIUM+ issues" not "code is good enough".max_iterations defaults to 3. If the user says "until done" without a cap, set it to 5 and note the cap.git push before review, no deploy before tests.npx claudepluginhub dioptx/weft --plugin weftGuides creation, editing, and verification of skills for AI coding agents using test-driven development with subagent scenarios. Use when authoring or debugging skills.