Stats
Actions
Tags
From academic-paper
Simulates peer review on LaTeX academic paper drafts: generates 5 reviewer personas with 5D scoring, devil's advocate stress tests, editorial decision, and revision roadmap.
How this skill is triggered — by the user, by Claude, or both
Slash command
/academic-paper:paper-reviewThis skill is limited to the following tools:
The summary Claude sees in its skill listing — used to decide when to auto-load this skill
Simulate peer review on an academic LaTeX paper draft. Runs the full review
Simulate peer review on an academic LaTeX paper draft. Runs the full review pipeline: 5 reviewer personas -> 5-dimension scoring -> devils-advocate stress test -> editorial synthesis decision -> revision roadmap.
Same as paper-draft. If no .paper-config.yml is found, stop.
$ARGUMENTS for optional --sections=<comma-list> to limit review
to specific sections (default: review the whole paper).peer_reviewer agent. The agent:
subfieldReviewReport with
5-dimension scores (originality, rigor, evidence, coherence, writing)ReviewReport includes recommendation (accept/minor/major/reject)devils_advocate agent to run 7 stress tests on the same
draft (counter-arguments, cherry-picking detection, "So What?" test,
etc.). Output is a 6th ReviewReport with reviewer_id: DA.editorial_synthesizer agent to weight all 6 reports by
confidence and produce a final decision plus a RevisionRoadmap.build/review_report.md (using the
templates/review_report.md template format).This skill orchestrates multiple agents that produce:
ReviewReport (one per reviewer, 5+1 total)RevisionRoadmap (final, from editorial_synthesizer)See references/handoff_schemas.md for full schemas.
/paper-revise (when external reviewer comments arrive) to compare with
this simulated review/paper-draft <section> to address the highest-priority items from the
RevisionRoadmapnpx claudepluginhub curryfromuestc/academic-paper --plugin academic-paperSimulates a full academic journal peer review with EIC decision and 3 independent reviewers (Methodology Expert, Domain Specialist, Devil's Advocate). Scores 1–10 and issues verdicts: Accept, Minor Revision, Major Revision, or Reject.
Simulates a multi-perspective academic peer review with 5 reviewer personas (EIC, 3 peers, Devil's Advocate) and multiple review modes including full review, re-review, quick assessment, methodology focus, and guided Socratic review.
Simulates a multi-perspective academic peer review with 5 independent reviewers (EIC, 3 peers, Devil's Advocate) and field-specific expertise. Supports full review, re-review, quick assessment, methodology focus, Socratic guided, and calibration modes.