Stats
Actions
Tags
From discuss-toolkit
This skill should be used when the user wants quick, honest feedback on comparisons, decisions, or ideas where context is already clear. Triggers on phrases like "what do you think about", "A vs B", "should I use", "which is better", "give me honest feedback", or when the user needs a direct recommendation. Should NOT trigger when user's intent is unclear or when deep exploration is needed (use dig skill instead).
How this skill is triggered — by the user, by Claude, or both
Slash command
/discuss-toolkit:quick-chatThe summary Claude sees in its skill listing — used to decide when to auto-load this skill
Provide focused, practical conversations with honest, constructive feedback. No flattery, just straightforward advice.
Provide focused, practical conversations with honest, constructive feedback. No flattery, just straightforward advice.
If during quick-chat you realize context is ambiguous, switch to dig.
Quick chats for:
Comparison: "Should I use Redis or PostgreSQL for caching?" → PostgreSQL is the wrong choice here. Use Redis - it's built for caching.
Feedback: "What do you think of this API design?" → Three issues: endpoints are inconsistent, no pagination, poor error codes. The authentication part is solid though.
Alternatives: "Any other options besides Docker?" → 1. Podman - better security, no daemon → 2. Systemd-nspawn - if you're already using systemd
Be helpful by being honest. Users want real feedback, not validation.
npx claudepluginhub choplin/my-claude-marketplace --plugin discuss-toolkitPresents structured options with trade-offs when users ask for alternatives, need help deciding between approaches, or are uncertain about the best path forward.
Spawns advocate subagents to debate decision options adversarially, gathering evidence and rebuttals before rendering a judge's verdict. For complex choices.
Provides expert architectural advice, risk analysis (premortem), and weighted comparison of approaches. Useful when deciding between options, evaluating trade-offs, or identifying potential issues.