From debate-skills
Compare several strategic options, force explicit trade-offs, and rank the strongest path. Use when the user has multiple plausible directions and wants a sharper decision memo.
How this skill is triggered — by the user, by Claude, or both
Slash command
/debate-skills:options-challengeThe summary Claude sees in its skill listing — used to decide when to auto-load this skill
Use this skill for decisions where at least two plausible paths exist and the user wants ranking, trade-offs, and a final recommendation.
Use this skill for decisions where at least two plausible paths exist and the user wants ranking, trade-offs, and a final recommendation.
Treat $ARGUMENTS as the full decision brief.
Accept either Log File: or Save As: in the user brief.
Resolve the log path with these rules:
No Log, Log: none, or Log File: none, skip all file writing. Do not resolve a path, do not create directories, do not save anything.go-to-market-options becomes .claude/debate-logs/go-to-market-options.md..md stays as given under .claude/debate-logs/.notes/decisions/go-to-market-options.md is used relative to the project root..claude/debate-logs/${CLAUDE_SESSION_ID}-options-challenge.md.2-4 distinct options.Log Path (omit if logging is disabled)Decision BriefOption SetCodex ChallengeTop Options Stress TestRevised RankingFinal RecommendationWhy Not The AlternativesKey AssumptionsIf the user opted out of logging, skip this entire section — do not write any files and do not print log status lines.
Write the same visible output to the resolved log path.
If the file already exists, append a new entry unless the user explicitly asks to replace it.
Each saved entry must contain:
After saving, end with:
Log saved: <path> or Log failed: <reason>.
/options-challenge Finalizer: Claude. Log File: gtm-paths-q3. Decision Brief: Compare three GTM paths for an AI debate product: direct-to-student subscription, educator-led adoption, or partnerships with debate organizations. Constraints: tiny team, low sales capacity, need traction in one quarter.
npx claudepluginhub biyachuev/claude-debate-skillsStructures product decisions into concise docs with options, trade-offs, comparisons, recommendation, reversibility, and next steps for stakeholder review.
Auto-Decision Engine: iterative decision simulation using autoresearch principles and a persona council. Decomposes decisions, generates competing hypotheses, simulates first/second-order effects with probabilities, critiques via anonymized peer review, and iterates until insights stabilize mechanically. The output is a possibility map — hypotheses, effects, council disagreements, adversarial scenarios, assumptions — with a recommendation synthesized at the end, not as the product.
Provides structured decision-making by weighing pros and cons, stakeholders, risks, and alternatives. Useful when evaluating options or planning approach.