claim-extraction

Claim Extraction Format (Resume)

The claim-extractor agent reads the ingest summary of a resume / CV / portfolio and produces a markdown document at .resume-review/runs/<timestamp>/claims.md conforming exactly to this schema.

Schema

# Claims extracted from <subject>

## Stated identity
<one to three sentences, in the subject's own framing: name / headline / positioning / target role>

## Seniority and role signal
<what level and role-type the resume claims or implies: IC/manager, junior/senior/staff/principal, founder, student, switcher; quote the exact title/language>

## Proposed value proposition
<two to five sentences: what the candidate says they bring, copied or paraphrased closely>

## Employment history claims

- <company> — <title>, <dates as written> — source: <section and line>
- ...

## Education / credential claims

- <institution> — <degree / credential>, <dates> — source: <section>
- ...

## Quantitative impact claims

- <verbatim or closely paraphrased metric claim ("grew revenue 300%", "managed team of 12", "reduced latency by 80%", "shipped to 5M users")> — source: <section>
- ...

## Qualitative self-descriptors

- <verbatim adjective-bearing claim ("strategic leader", "results-driven", "seasoned full-stack engineer")> — source: <section>
- ...

## Skill and technology claims

- <tool / stack / framework as listed, plus any self-assigned proficiency level> — source: <section>
- ...

## Differentiation claims

- <what the candidate claims to do / be better than X> — source: <section>
- ...

## Hedges recorded verbatim

- <any "helped", "contributed to", "part of a team that", "familiar with", "exposure to", "basic understanding" claim> — source: <section>
- ...

## Internal inconsistencies detected (factual only)

- <date overlaps, titles that conflict with stated seniority elsewhere, X years of Y where Y wasn't public that long, etc. — record as observation, do not interpret>
- (if none) `- (none)`

Rules for the claim-extractor

1. Neutral. No skepticism, no editorializing, no confidence tags. This stage records what the resume says, not whether it's true. Downstream specialists do the interrogation.
2. Complete. Every quantitative number asserted anywhere in the ingested material appears under Quantitative impact claims. Every adjective-bearing self-descriptor appears under Qualitative self-descriptors. Every listed technology appears under Skill and technology claims.
3. Verbatim where feasible. If a claim is a single bullet or sentence, quote it. If longer, paraphrase closely and cite section.
4. Source every line. No claim appears without source: <section>. Unsourced claims are a validation failure.
5. If a section has no entries, write - (none) on a single line. Never leave a section empty.
6. Internal inconsistencies are factual-only at this stage. "React experience claim = 15 years; React released 2013-05" is a factual observation and belongs here. "This seems suspicious" is a judgment and does not.