From draft-detective
Entry point for Draft Detective: lists all available checks (reference validation, figures/tables, document contents, recommendation check, inference validation, peer review) and asks the user what to run.
How this skill is triggered — by the user, by Claude, or both
Slash command
/draft-detective:capabilitiesThe summary Claude sees in its skill listing — used to decide when to auto-load this skill
The user has asked to use Draft Detective but has **not** specified what to run. Draft Detective offers several capabilities, each implemented as its own skill. Your job here is **only to help them choose** — do not run anything yet, and do not guess on their behalf.
The user has asked to use Draft Detective but has not specified what to run. Draft Detective offers several capabilities, each implemented as its own skill. Your job here is only to help them choose — do not run anything yet, and do not guess on their behalf.
Keep your message concise and scannable — a short intro line, the lists, and the question.
These review the document and flag issues.
| Assessment | What it checks | Skill |
|---|---|---|
| Reference Error Checker | Are your references accurate? Uses web search to confirm each citation exists and that the author, title, publisher, and year match public sources — catching typos and hallucinated references. | reference-validation |
| Figures & Tables Check | Are all figures and tables properly titled, consistently numbered, cited in the body text, and do all body-text references resolve to a real figure or table? | figures-tables-check |
| Document Contents | Does the document include all required sections — About This, Acknowledgements, Methods, Results, Conclusion, References, and an Appendix when one is referenced? | document-contents |
| Recommendation Check | Is each recommendation supported by the document's own findings? Flags recommendations with weak, indirect, missing, or contradictory backing. | recommendation-check |
| Internal Inference Validation | Does the reasoning hold up? Flags logical leaps, unsupported conclusions, and arguments where the evidence doesn't support the claim. | inference-validation |
| Reviewer 2 | A rigorous simulated peer review — summary, strengths, weaknesses, and prioritized next steps — plus a separate devil's-advocate rebuttal. (Beta.) | reviewer-2 |
These operate on the document's references rather than flagging issues.
| Tool | What it does | Skill |
|---|---|---|
| Download References | Search the web for a reference and download its full original content (PDF/Markdown), verifying the match. Reports found / found-but-inaccessible / not-found. | reference-download |
npx claudepluginhub agencyenterprise/draft-detective --plugin draft-detectiveSystematic self-review checklist for academic papers covering structure, logic consistency, citations, claim auditing, figure/table quality, and writing clarity.
Audits academic or technical manuscripts with a section-level refactoring report covering argument architecture, narrative flow, citation hygiene, and submission-readiness.
Audits academic papers pre-submission using parallel agents for content, numerical consistency, references/DOIs, writing quality, figures/formatting, and replication archives.