Stats
Actions
Tags
From example-skills
Evaluates content via Critique → Reinforcement → Risk Analysis → Growth phases for writing, arguments, proposals, or code docs. Supports interactive/autonomous modes and markdown/checklist/inline outputs.
How this skill is triggered — by the user, by Claude, or both
Slash command
/example-skills:evaluation-to-growthThe summary Claude sees in its skill listing — used to decide when to auto-load this skill
A systematic framework for transforming content through rigorous evaluation into stronger, more resilient final products.
A systematic framework for transforming content through rigorous evaluation into stronger, more resilient final products.
Before beginning, determine execution mode and output format.
Interactive Mode: Walk through each phase step-by-step, pausing for user input and direction between stages. Best for collaborative refinement or learning the framework.
Autonomous Mode: Execute all phases and deliver comprehensive results. Best for efficient batch evaluation or when user wants complete analysis upfront.
Markdown Report: Structured document with sections for each phase, findings, and recommendations. Best for documentation or sharing.
Structured Checklist: Itemized findings with status indicators and action items. Best for tracking and implementation.
Inline Revisions: Suggestions embedded within or alongside the original content. Best for direct editing workflow.
[Evaluation] → [Reinforcement] → [Risk Analysis] → [Growth]
Comprehensive assessment across five dimensions.
Identify strengths and weaknesses holistically.
Prompt: "Evaluate this content thoroughly. Identify its key strengths and weaknesses. Highlight which parts are effective and which need improvement, providing specific reasons."
Output structure:
Ensure internal consistency and sound reasoning.
Prompt: "Examine the content for logical consistency. Identify contradictions, gaps in reasoning, or unsupported claims, and suggest how to strengthen coherence."
Output structure:
Assess rational and factual appeal.
Prompt: "Assess the rational and factual appeal of this content. Are the arguments clear, well-supported, and persuasive? Suggest ways to enhance the logical impact."
Output structure:
Evaluate emotional resonance.
Prompt: "Analyze the emotional tone and resonance of this content. Does it create an emotional connection with its intended audience? Recommend adjustments to increase engagement."
Output structure:
Examine credibility and authority.
Prompt: "Evaluate the credibility and authority of this content. Does it reflect expertise and trustworthiness? Suggest ways to reinforce its reliability and professional tone."
Output structure:
Consolidate and strengthen based on evaluation findings.
Integrate logic check findings to eliminate contradictions and reinforce coherence.
Actions:
Identify vulnerabilities before they become failures.
Reveal overlooked areas or hidden assumptions.
Prompt: "Identify any areas in this content that may be overlooked, biased, or based on hidden assumptions. Provide suggestions to address these gaps or risks."
Output structure:
Pinpoint critical vulnerabilities.
Prompt: "Analyze the content for potential vulnerabilities or weak points that could cause failure or serious criticism. Recommend preventive measures or reinforcements."
Output structure:
Transform evaluation into evolution.
Generate new directions from the analysis.
Prompt: "From the reviewed content, generate innovative ideas, new directions, or insights that could enhance or expand its impact."
Output structure:
Produce the strengthened final version.
Prompt: "Incorporate all feedback and refinements to create a polished, stronger, and more resilient final version of the content."
Output structure:
Step 1: "I'll evaluate your content using the Evaluation-to-Growth framework.
First, let's assess strengths and weaknesses. [Critique results]
Would you like to discuss these findings before moving to logic check?"
Step 2: [Wait for response, then proceed to Logic Check]
Step 3: [Continue through each phase with pause points]
Step 4: "We've completed the evaluation phases. Ready to move into Risk Analysis?"
[Continue through all phases with user checkpoints]
"I'll provide a complete Evaluation-to-Growth analysis of your content.
## Evaluation Phase
[All five dimensions with findings]
## Reinforcement
[Synthesis and coherence improvements]
## Risk Analysis
[Blind spots and shatter points]
## Growth
[Emergent insights and evolved version]
## Summary
[Key findings and recommended next steps]"
See references/report-template.md
See references/checklist-template.md
See references/inline-template.md
| Phase | Purpose | Key Question |
|---|---|---|
| Critique | Holistic assessment | What works? What doesn't? |
| Logic Check | Internal consistency | Does it contradict itself? |
| Logos | Rational appeal | Is the argument sound? |
| Pathos | Emotional appeal | Does it connect? |
| Ethos | Credibility | Is it trustworthy? |
| Blind Spots | Hidden risks | What am I not seeing? |
| Shatter Points | Critical vulnerabilities | Where could this fail? |
| Bloom | Emergent growth | What new possibilities emerge? |
| Evolve | Final refinement | What's the strongest version? |
references/report-template.md - Full markdown report formatreferences/checklist-template.md - Structured checklist formatreferences/inline-template.md - Inline revision formatnpx claudepluginhub a-organvm/a-i--skills --plugin document-skillsProvides a checklist for code reviews covering functionality, security, performance, maintainability, tests, and quality. Use for pull requests, audits, team standards, and developer training.