By seokrae
7-Phase Context Engineering plugin: a single pipeline to collect, select, structure, compress, generate, and verify AI context.
Phase 4-5: Structures and compresses the selected context. Receives gather Artifacts and organizes them into a model-readable form, retaining only the essentials. Keywords: context structuring, compression, key facts, constraints, decisions
Phase 6: Generates the final output matching Phase 1 success criteria. Receives the context compressed by build and assembles it into one of: execution instruction / KB entry / project artifacts. Keywords: execution instruction, prompt, role task constraints output format, knowledge entry, CLAUDE.md, spec
7-Phase Context Engineering pipeline — systematically builds context to send to AI. Problem Definition → Candidate Collection → Selection → Structuring → Compression → Execution Instruction Generation → Verification. Keywords: context engineering, ai context, prompt, knowledge base, CLAUDE.md, spec, 7-phase
Phase 1-3: Define the problem, collect context candidates, and select only what is needed. The first stage of the 7-Phase Context Engineering pipeline. Keywords: problem definition, context collection, selection, relevance, recency, reliability
Phase 7: Final holistic verification. Automatically invoked on G6 failure, or run manually. Checks for omissions, conflicts, speculation, and consistency, then reports confidence. Artifacts are not modified — only the verification log is recorded. Keywords: verification, holistic check, confidence, feedback loop, omission, conflict, speculation
Own this plugin?
Verify ownership to unlock analytics, metadata editing, and a verified badge. GitHub access is read-only (username + org membership).
Sign in to claimOwn this plugin?
Verify ownership to unlock analytics, metadata editing, and a verified badge. GitHub access is read-only (username + org membership).
Sign in to claimBased on adoption, maintenance, documentation, and repository signals. Not a security audit or endorsement.
A Claude Code plugin that systematically prepares AI context through a 7-phase pipeline — deciding what information to include, in what structure, at what level of compression.
| Question | Answer |
|---|---|
| When | Information comes from 2+ sources, or a simple copy-paste would cause the AI to miss context |
| How | Run /context-engineering → answer 3 questions → the 7-phase pipeline handles the rest. Jump directly to a sub-skill if prior phases are already done |
| How Much | Compression scales with input size — see the Token Budget table below |
| Situation | Use CE? | Reason |
|---|---|---|
| Single question, no extra context needed | No | A plain prompt is enough |
| Editing one file with a clear scope | No | Direct instruction is faster |
| Combining information from 2+ sources | Yes | AI will miss context without it |
| Need to reference previous decisions | Yes | KB retrieval keeps things consistent |
| Starting a project (CLAUDE.md + spec) | Yes | Format C generates all project artifacts |
| Writing the same type of prompt repeatedly | Yes | Format A produces a reusable instruction |
| Accumulating domain knowledge | Yes | Format B saves a KB entry |
| Scenario | Entry point | Prerequisite |
|---|---|---|
| Starting from scratch | /context-engineering | — |
| Re-running gather only | :gather | — |
| Phase 1/3 artifacts already exist | :build | gather output required |
| Compressed context block exists | :compose | build output required |
| Re-validating existing output | :verify | compose output required |
| KB housekeeping | :verify --consolidate | Maintenance mode (independent of pipeline) |
Each sub-skill checks for its prerequisite artifacts and exits with guidance if they are missing.
Once you know which sub-skill to enter, decide what context sources take priority for your task type:
| Task type | Priority context | De-prioritize | Output |
|---|---|---|---|
| Q&A / factual answer | Retrieval-heavy: KB entries, source evidence, authoritative docs | Conversation history, speculative notes | — (direct answer) |
| Project setup | Architecture principles, CLAUDE.md policy, spec template, implementation plan | Unrelated KB entries | C |
| Knowledge base entry | Consolidation check, duplicate detection, stale entry check | Raw source text (already distilled) | B |
| Execution instruction | Role, task, constraints, output format | Verbose background (compress in Phase 5) | A |
This table guides Phase 2 source selection and Phase 5 compression priorities. See context-source-strategy.md for the underlying RAG / Memory / Tool Result / System Prompt classification.
Phase 5 compresses collected context to fit within a target token budget. Compression tier is determined by input size:
| Scale | Word count | Target compression | Strategy |
|---|---|---|---|
| Small (single file / question) | < 500 words | None needed | Pass through as-is |
| Medium (module / feature) | 500–2,000 words | ≤ 50% | Summarize Notes → remove duplicates |
| Large (full project) | 2,000+ words | ≤ 30% | Remove Notes → condense Key Facts |
Compression order (what gets cut first):
For large sources (2,000+ words), Phase 5 uses progressive loading: scan headers first, then read only the sections relevant to Phase 1 purpose.
Context Engineering is the practice of designing what goes into an LLM's context window — beyond writing a single good prompt, it decides what information to give AI, when, and in what structure. RAG, memory architecture, token budget management, and system prompt design all fall under this umbrella.
--consolidate detects duplicate, stale, and orphaned entriesnpx claudepluginhub seokrae/context-engineering --plugin context-engineering착수보고서(Project Charter) 체크리스트 기반 검토 플러그인. PM 표준 기반으로 완성도·모호성·일관성·리스크를 분석한다.
JD(채용공고) 기반 이력서 맞춤 최적화 스킬. JD를 채점 기준표로 분석하고 경험을 PHER 구조로 재구성한다.
Generate self-contained HTML visualizations from documents and data
karpathy-guidelines와 issue-driven development가 구조적으로 통합된 커스텀 개발 워크플로우 하네스
FDE(Forward Deployed Engineer) 실천 일부를 차용한 AI 코딩 에이전트 하네스 — 현재 등급 FDE-inspired (2-차원 평가). 지원 모드 3/3: 스플릿 🟢, 딥다이브 ✅, 챔피언 🟢. 자기평가 docs/fde-self-evaluation.md 참조.
Persistent file-based planning for AI coding agents. Crash-proof markdown plans (task_plan.md, findings.md, progress.md) that survive context loss and /clear, with an opt-in completion gate and multi-agent shared state. Manus-style. Works with Claude Code, Codex CLI, Cursor, Kiro, OpenCode and 60+ agents via the SKILL.md standard. Includes Arabic, German, Spanish, and Chinese (Simplified and Traditional).
Claude harness - A harness for solo developers (Vibecoders) to handle full-cycle contract development.
Core skills library for Claude Code: TDD, debugging, collaboration patterns, and proven techniques
Harness-native ECC operator layer - 67 agents, 271 skills, 92 legacy command shims, reusable hooks, rules, selective install profiles, and production-ready workflows for Claude Code, Codex, OpenCode, Cursor, and related agent harnesses
Tools to maintain and improve CLAUDE.md files - audit quality, capture session learnings, and keep project memory current.
Plugin-safe Claude Code distribution of Antigravity Awesome Skills with 1,561 supported skills.