Conduct adversarial code reviews by dispatching parallel same-model AI subagents that compete on findings via scoring, aggregating issues with worst severity on disagreements. Extend to multi-model reviews across Claude, Codex, Gemini, and others with cross-critiques to detect hallucinations and severity inflation, synthesizing deduplicated reports. Evaluate precision and recall using fixture-based suite.
Use when reviewing a diff, commit, branch, or implementation against a spec — dispatches two same-model reviewer subagents in parallel under a competitive scoring frame, then aggregates findings. Triggers on "review this", "PAR review", "adversarial review", or any evaluative gate (scope review, spec compliance, code quality, audit).
Use for high-stakes review where you want multiple model providers reviewing the same artifact and critiquing each other. Shells out to installed coding-agent CLIs (claude, codex, gemini, pi, opencode by default; amp and droid available opt-in) to run parallel reviews, then runs a cross-critique grid where each reviewer evaluates the others' findings to catch hallucinations and severity inflation, then synthesizes a final deduplicated report. Triggers on "MMAR review", "multi-model review", "cross-model adversarial", "review with all the models", or when single-model PAR feels insufficient.
Own this plugin?
Verify ownership to unlock analytics, metadata editing, and a verified badge. GitHub access is read-only (username + org membership).
Sign in to claimOwn this plugin?
Verify ownership to unlock analytics, metadata editing, and a verified badge. GitHub access is read-only (username + org membership).
Sign in to claimBased on adoption, maintenance, documentation, and repository signals. Not a security audit or endorsement.
npx claudepluginhub prime-radiant-inc/parallel-adversarial-reviewReverse engineer clean behavioral specs from any codebase
An iterative implementation methodology that pairs with superpowers. Extracts requirements with proof obligations from large spec collateral, defines a walking skeleton that closes a real journey, then loops through audited sprints building a behavior evidence corpus until an auditor confirms the product matches the spec. Designed for comprehensive or ambiguous specs where the upfront writing-plans flow loses the plot.
Streamlined Linear integration - one tool, seven actions, zero bloat
A documentation department in a box: studies a project and its readers, decides the doc portfolio with you, writes contributor/user/adopter docs with verified claims, and keeps them true as the code moves
Records Claude Code sessions as agent trajectories in cxdb
Multi-agent code review for Claude Code — parallel review by Codex (GPT-5.5), Gemini 3.1 Pro, and five Claude specialist subagents (one run blind), then verified synthesis.
Run multiple code review agents in parallel for comprehensive feedback
Multi-lens code review pipeline: deep review (Claude or Codex), automated fix loop, interactive walkthrough, manual promote, external-finding injection.
Symmetric two-AI peer review using OpenAI Codex CLI. Both AIs review independently in a blind pass, then debate per-issue with terminal states until convergence. Catches significantly more issues than single-pass validation.
Automated code review with severity levels and actionable feedback
Automatic code review, adversarial review, and rescue via Codex.