By pacaplan
Trigger AI skills with 'wtf' phrases to interrupt stuck tasks, summarize progress, challenge flawed reasoning, root-cause errors, brutally review and refactor code, triage git issues, and apply quick fixes during chaotic development sessions.
Interrupt mid-task and demand an explanation of what the agent is doing and why. Use when the user asks "wtf are you doing", "what's the plan", "explain yourself", "where are you going with this", "stop and explain", or "what are you working on".
Challenge something the agent just said and force a genuine re-examination. Use when the user asks "wtf are you thinking", "that's wrong", "push back", "are you sure", "that doesn't sound right", "re-examine", or "double check that".
TL;DR summary of recent verbose agent activity. Use when the user asks "wtf did you say", "what just happened", "summarize what you did", "catch me up", "tldr", or "what did you do".
Skip the diagnosis monologue and go straight to fixing the current problem. Use when the user says "wtf fix it", "just fix it", "make it work", "fix this", or "stop talking and fix it".
Brutally honest code review followed by a refactor. Use when the user asks "wtf is this", "this code is terrible", "refactor this", "clean this up", "code review", "this is a mess", "look at this code", or "review this".
Own this plugin?
Verify ownership to unlock analytics, metadata editing, and a verified badge. GitHub access is read-only (username + org membership).
Sign in to claimOwn this plugin?
Verify ownership to unlock analytics, metadata editing, and a verified badge. GitHub access is read-only (username + org membership).
Sign in to claimBased on adoption, maintenance, documentation, and repository signals. Not a security audit or endorsement.
A Claude Code plugin for when things go sideways.
Ten debugging, explanation, and code review skills for the moments when something just broke, you can't remember what you were doing, or you need a second opinion before shipping.
It started with this:

So I said (jokingly, or so I thought):

And then I thought: WTF - why not?
Are these skills well thought out? Not really. But are they useful? Maybe.
| Command | What it does |
|---|---|
/wtf:are-you-doing | Interrupt mid-task and demand an explanation of the plan. |
/wtf:are-you-thinking | Push back on something Claude just said. Forces a genuine re-examination. |
/wtf:did-you-say | TL;DR of a long autonomous agent chain. The "I stepped away for coffee" button. |
/wtf:fix-it | Skip the lecture. Just make it work. |
/wtf:is-this | Brutally honest code review, followed by a refactor. |
/wtf:should-i-do | Triage everything that's broken and give a prioritized action plan. |
/wtf:was-i-thinking | Self-review your own recent diffs and commits before opening a PR. |
/wtf:went-wrong | Root cause debugging. Traces the chain of causation, not just the symptom. |
/wtf:why-not | Evaluate an unconventional idea and make an honest case for why it might work. |
/wtf:wtf | Quick acknowledgement and redirect when you just say "wtf" without context. |
In Claude Code, add the wtf marketplace and install the plugin:
claude plugin marketplace add pacaplan/wtf
claude plugin install wtf
claude plugin marketplace update wtf
claude plugin update wtf@wtf
All skills accept optional arguments for context:
/wtf:went-wrong it started failing after the last commit
/wtf:is-this this class is way too long
/wtf:was-i-thinking
Or just type "wtf" when something breaks. The plugin will know what to do.
MIT
npx claudepluginhub pacaplan/wtf --plugin wtfDeveloper experience essentials: GitHub Actions debugging, conversation cloning/half-cloning, context handoffs, and Reddit research
Analytical thinking tools - dialectic analysis, bias elimination, codex consultation
Codex CLIにセカンドオピニオンを求めるスキル。「codexと相談して」「codexに聞いて」で発動する。
Read The Fucking Prompt — finds the strongest user reaction to an AI instruction-following failure in a chosen session, reconstructs the triggering assistant output, and renders a shareable terminal-style PNG.
專業的問題分析專家系統,提供五個專門代理(問題分析、程式碼調查、根本原因定位、Git歷史分析、日誌分析)進行系統化的深度問題診斷,支援條件觸發和並行執行
Automatic code review, adversarial review, and rescue via Codex.