By nealcaren
Simulate peer reviews for academic manuscripts by drawing perspectives from Zotero sources to construct reviewer personas, retrieve full texts, and produce targeted feedback on theory, methods, and findings.
Own this plugin?
Verify ownership to unlock analytics, metadata editing, and a verified badge. GitHub access is read-only (username + org membership).
Sign in to claimOwn this plugin?
Verify ownership to unlock analytics, metadata editing, and a verified badge. GitHub access is read-only (username + org membership).
Sign in to claimBased on adoption, maintenance, documentation, and repository signals. Not a security audit or endorsement.
npx claudepluginhub nealcaren/sociology-analysis-agents --plugin peer-reviewerDraft case justification sections for interview-based sociology articles. Five cluster styles (Minimal/Standard/Historical/Comparative/Policy) based on analysis of 32 Social Problems/Social Forces articles.
Stata statistical analysis for publication-ready sociology research. Phased workflow for DiD, IV, matching, panel methods, and more with pauses for user review.
Build bibliographies from manuscript citations using Zotero. Extract in-text citations, match against Zotero library, and generate formatted bibliographies in APA, ASA, or Chicago style.
Develop causal diagrams (DAGs) from social-science research questions and literature, then render publication-ready figures using Mermaid, R, or Python.
Pragmatic qualitative analysis for interview data. Supports theory-informed or data-first approaches with systematic coding, quality indicators, and publication-ready synthesis.
Deep reading and synthesis of literature corpus. Theoretical mapping, thematic clustering, and debate identification using Zotero MCP for full-text access.
Draft publication-ready Theory sections for sociology research. Guides structure, paragraph functions, sentence craft, and calibration based on analysis of 80 Social Problems/Social Forces articles.
Skills and agents for anthropological research across the full research lifecycle — from question formulation through publication and career advancement
论文评审 — 5 人评审团队 + EIC:方法学、领域、统计、批判性、视角多维度审稿
Multi-agent orchestrator for academic writing: 12 specialist agents and 30 writing principles for review, research, drafting, polishing, bibliography auditing, and literature surveys.
PhD-level research capabilities: literature review, multi-source investigation, critical analysis, hypothesis-driven exploration, quantitative/qualitative methods, and lateral thinking