By mistakeknot
Engineering quality disciplines — systematic debugging, test-driven development, and verification gates.
Use when encountering any bug, test failure, or unexpected behavior, before proposing fixes
Use when implementing any feature or bugfix, before writing implementation code
Use when about to claim work is complete, fixed, or passing, or before committing/creating PRs — requires running verification commands and confirming output before any success claims; evidence before assertions.
Engineering quality disciplines for Claude Code.
Three skills that enforce process at the moments it matters most: when you're tempted to skip steps because you're "pretty sure" the fix works.
Systematic debugging: a 4-phase root-cause investigation that starts with reading the error, then reproducing it, then analyzing the cause, then verifying the fix. The discipline is in the order: no guessing, no "let me try this" before you can reproduce the problem. Read first, reproduce second.
Test-driven development: strict RED-GREEN-REFACTOR. Write a failing test that describes what you want. Make it pass with the simplest possible code. Then refactor. No production code without a failing test, no refactoring while tests are red. The constraint is the point.
Verification before completion: iron-law evidence gates. Before claiming something works, you need fresh evidence: tests passing, the behavior observable, the fix verified in the actual failure mode. "It should work" is not evidence; "here's the test output showing it works" is evidence.
First, add the interagency marketplace (one-time setup):
/plugin marketplace add mistakeknot/interagency-marketplace
Then install the plugin:
/plugin install intertest
/intertest:systematic-debugging
/intertest:test-driven-development
/intertest:verification-before-completion
Or let the skills trigger naturally:
"debug this test failure"
"implement this feature with TDD"
"verify that the fix actually works"
The skills cross-reference each other: TDD naturally leads into verification, debugging naturally leads into TDD for the regression test.
Own this plugin?
Verify ownership to unlock analytics, metadata editing, and a verified badge. GitHub access is read-only (username + org membership).
Sign in to claimOwn this plugin?
Verify ownership to unlock analytics, metadata editing, and a verified badge. GitHub access is read-only (username + org membership).
Sign in to claimBased on adoption, maintenance, documentation, and repository signals. Not a security audit or endorsement.
npx claudepluginhub mistakeknot/interagency-marketplace --plugin intertest[DEPRECATED — use intervoice] Analyze your writing style and adapt Claude's output to sound like you. Replaced by intervoice, which reads one global multi-register profile instead of per-project glob-routed files.
Recursive AGENTS.md generator with integrated Oracle critique, CLAUDE.md harmonization, incremental updates, diff previews, and smart monorepo scoping. Cross-AI compatible.
Token-efficient code reconnaissance for LLMs. Autonomous skills save 48-85% tokens via diff-context, semantic search, structural patterns, and symbol analysis. Includes MCP server for direct tool integration.
Self-improving agent rig: codifies product and engineering discipline into composable workflows from brainstorm to ship. Compounds knowledge, generates domain agents, monitors its own docs, and surfaces conservative update drift. Orchestrates Claude, Codex, and Oracle through 6 agents, 52 commands, 19 skills, 0 MCP servers. Factory substrate: CXDB turn DAG, scenario bank with satisfaction scoring, evidence pipeline, agent capability policies. Companions: interspect, interphase, interline, interflux, interpath, interwatch, interslack, interform, intercraft, interdev, interpeer, intertest.
Token efficiency benchmarking, session analytics, and API-equivalent cost analysis for agent workflows
Core skills library for Claude Code: TDD, debugging, collaboration patterns, and proven techniques
Test-driven development workflow for writing tests before implementation - red-green-refactor cycle with deterministic unit tests
52 agent skills for systematic software development. Covers design, planning, TDD, code review, debugging, quality gates, and adversarial testing. 12 core skills are eval-tested with measured A/B deltas using Anthropic's skill evaluation framework.
Test-Driven Development (TDD) principles and red-green-refactor cycle enforcement.
Automated Test-Driven Development enforcement
Guides AI agents through disciplined coding practices. Language and build-system agnostic core with extensible language/build skills.