By lnilya
Generate, critique, and scaffold academic paragraphs from atomic sentences and research papers. Extract empirical results with citations, plan introduction sections, build Wikipedia-style Obsidian vaults from PDFs, and group claims for literature reviews.
Critique and improve academic writing at the paragraph level, or produce new academic paragraphs from scratch. Use this skill whenever the user pastes academic text and wants feedback, revision suggestions, or a rewrite; when they ask to "improve this paragraph", "critique my writing", "make this more academic", "help me write a paragraph about X", or asks for academic prose with a specific argument. Also trigger when the user provides a topic, claim, or rough notes and wants them shaped into a polished academic paragraph. Always use for academic writing tasks — even if the request is phrased casually.
Extracts atomic sentences from academic papers — identify every cited paper, compress each citation into a single logical claim, group them by sub-topic, and summarize each group. Use this skill whenever the user pastes academic text or uploads a PDF and wants to extract what cited papers actually claimed, map the literature, build a citation map, extract key arguments from a paper, atomize citations, or asks things like "what does each paper say?", "extract the key claims", "give me an atomic breakdown of this paper", "pull out all the references and their arguments", "summarize the citations by topic", or "elaborate on [Author Year]". Also trigger when the user is preparing a literature review, working in Obsidian/Zotero/Notion and needs structured citation blocks, or uploads a PDF with a request to extract referenced claims. This skill is essential any time someone is working with dense academic text and needs to see what all the cited sources actually argued.
Plan and scaffold an academic introduction section from source papers, context, or rough notes. Use this skill whenever Ilya wants to structure an intro, outline a paper's opening, map the literature into a writing plan, figure out what paragraphs an introduction needs, or asks "what should my intro cover?", "help me plan my introduction", "outline an intro from these papers", "what topics should I introduce?", "scaffold my intro section", "turn these papers into an intro plan", or "structure my background section". Also trigger when the user uploads or pastes papers/abstracts and wants to know what to write about — even if they don't say "introduction" explicitly. This skill does NOT write the prose; it produces a clear paragraph-by-paragraph blueprint that guides writing. For the actual prose, hand off to ea-academic-writer.
Build a Wikipedia-style Obsidian knowledge network from academic PDFs, or expand an existing one with new papers. Use when the user wants to create a concept network, knowledge graph, or Obsidian world from papers — or add new papers to one already built. Trigger phrases include build an Obsidian world, create a knowledge network, extract concepts into Obsidian, build a knowledge graph, turn papers into an Obsidian vault, add this paper to my vault, expand my knowledge network, I have new papers to add, update the world with these papers. Use proactively whenever multiple PDFs are provided alongside mentions of Obsidian, concepts, or knowledge organisation.
Extracts and analyses empirical results from primary research papers, summarising each result, explaining its importance, and decomposing the discussion into supporting or contrasting citations. Use this skill whenever the user pastes a paper, uploads a PDF, or shares a results/discussion section and wants to understand what was found and how it fits the literature. Trigger on phrases like "analyse this paper's results", "what did this paper find", "extract the results", "break down the discussion", "what papers support or contrast this result", "help me ground this paper in the literature", "summarise the findings", or "what's the discourse around these results". Also trigger when the user is building a literature review and needs to understand what a specific study found and how its discussion situates the results in prior work. Do NOT use for review papers, detect these early and refuse gracefully (see below).
Own this plugin?
Verify ownership to unlock analytics, metadata editing, and a verified badge. GitHub access is read-only (username + org membership).
Sign in to claimOwn this plugin?
Verify ownership to unlock analytics, metadata editing, and a verified badge. GitHub access is read-only (username + org membership).
Sign in to claimBased on adoption, maintenance, documentation, and repository signals. Not a security audit or endorsement.
Repository of Claude and Codex skills for academics (e.g. writing, reading, and data extraction)
You can download a tutorial PDF on how to install and use these skills here:
https://effortlessacademic.com/ai-skills-for-academics
Critiques existing academic paragraphs or writes new ones from scratch. Works by turning atomic sentences (one claim + one citation) into tightly structured prose. Every output comes in three variants — Speculative, Safe, and Assertive — so you can choose the voice that fits your argument.
Reads a paper (or pasted text) and compresses every cited reference into a single, essential logical claim. Groups those claims by sub-topic and adds a synthesis sentence for each group. The result is a clean, paste-ready citation map for Obsidian, Notion, or Zotero.
Takes your source papers and turns them into a paragraph-by-paragraph blueprint for an academic introduction. It maps the literature, asks you to confirm the relevant thread, then designs a logical argument that leads to your research gap — without writing a single word of prose itself. Pairs naturally with ea-academic-writer for the actual drafting.
Transforms a collection of academic PDFs into a Wikipedia-style Obsidian knowledge network. Extracts key concepts from each paper, deduplicates them across the corpus, and generates one interlinked concept note per topic — each populated with cited atomic sentences and wikilinks. Also supports an Expand mode for adding new papers to an existing vault.
Extracts and analyses the core empirical findings from a primary research paper. For each result, it summarises what was found, explains its significance, and identifies which cited papers in the discussion support or contrast it. Only works on primary research papers — review papers are detected and redirected to ea-atomic-sentences instead.
npx claudepluginhub lnilya/effortless-academic-skills --plugin academicskillsAcademic research agents — hypothesis generation, experiment design, paper drafting, peer review simulation, and more.
Semi-automated research assistant for academic research and software development, with skills for literature review, experiments, analysis, writing, and project knowledge management
Multi-agent orchestrator for academic writing: 12 specialist agents and 30 writing principles for review, research, drafting, polishing, bibliography auditing, and literature surveys.
Karpathy-style LLM wiki for research papers. Ingest a URL / arXiv ID / DOI / PDF, write a structured summary into a local Obsidian vault, and maintain a finding-level knowledge graph via wikilinks + Dataview.
LLM-maintained knowledge base skill — structured wiki with Obsidian, milestone-based source clustering, proactive write-back, and autonomous lint
完整学术流水线 — 从 idea 到论文的全流程编排:状态机追踪、完整性验证、claim 校验