By jongwony
Detect mismatches between code execution results and your application's context post-run. AI evaluates discrepancies for your review, then adapts outputs to produce context-aligned results.
When AI collaboration goes off-track, you redo everything. These protocols catch direction errors early — at the plan level, not the code level. Fix the direction, not the implementation.
Correcting a wrong direction at the plan level costs one conversation turn. At the code level, it costs hours of rework. These protocols insert structured checkpoints at decision points — intent, goal, context, perspective, execution — so you and AI stay aligned before committing to implementation.
Install all protocols and utilities:
curl -fsSL https://raw.githubusercontent.com/jongwony/epistemic-protocols/main/scripts/install.sh | bash
Then run /onboard — start with a quick recommendation based on your recent sessions, then optionally continue to guided learning with scenarios, trials, and quizzes.
Paste in Codex and run:
$skill-installer install these skills from jongwony/epistemic-protocols:
- prothesis/skills/frame
- syneidesis/skills/gap
- hermeneia/skills/clarify
- katalepsis/skills/grasp
- telos/skills/goal
- aitesis/skills/inquire
- horismos/skills/bound
- analogia/skills/ground
- prosoche/skills/attend
- epharmoge/skills/contextualize
- epistemic-cooperative/skills/onboard
Restart Codex, then start with $onboard.
onboard. /report, /dashboard, reflexion, write are not included.skill-installer pattern with one path.| Protocol | Command | When to use |
|---|---|---|
| Hermeneia | /clarify | AI keeps building what you didn't ask for |
| Telos | /goal | You know you want something but can't define success |
| Aitesis | /inquire | AI charges ahead without asking what it needs to know |
| Prothesis | /frame | Need to look at this from multiple angles, not sure which |
| Analogia | /ground | AI's advice sounds right in theory but unclear in your context |
| Syneidesis | /gap | About to commit but might be missing something |
| Prosoche | /attend | Want execution readiness checked and risky actions gated for your judgment |
| Epharmoge | /contextualize | AI's output is correct but doesn't fit your situation |
| Horismos | /bound | You need to define what you know vs what AI should figure out |
| Katalepsis | /grasp | AI made big changes and you need to actually understand them |
Concern clusters: Planning (/clarify, /goal, /inquire) · Analysis (/frame, /ground) · Decision (/gap) · Execution (/attend) · Verification (/contextualize) · Cross-cutting (/bound, /grasp)
| Plugin | Command | Purpose |
|---|---|---|
| Epistemic Cooperative | /onboard, /report, /dashboard | Protocol learning, usage analysis, and coverage dashboard |
Each protocol targets a specific point where AI collaboration can go wrong. For architecture details and design philosophy, see CLAUDE.md.
| Protocol | Greek | Meaning |
|---|---|---|
| Prothesis | πρόθεσις | Setting forth |
| Syneidesis | συνείδησις | Shared knowing |
| Hermeneia | ἑρμηνεία | Interpretation |
| Katalepsis | κατάληψις | Grasping, comprehension |
| Telos | τέλος | End, purpose |
| Horismos | ὁρισμός | A bounding |
| Aitesis | αἴτησις | Request, inquiry |
| Analogia | ἀναλογία | Proportion |
| Prosoche | προσοχή | Attention |
| Epharmoge | ἐφαρμογή | Application, fitting |
MIT
Own this plugin?
Verify ownership to unlock analytics, metadata editing, and a verified badge. GitHub access is read-only (username + org membership).
Sign in to claimOwn this plugin?
Verify ownership to unlock analytics, metadata editing, and a verified badge. GitHub access is read-only (username + org membership).
Sign in to claimBased on adoption, maintenance, documentation, and repository signals. Not a security audit or endorsement.
npx claudepluginhub jongwony/epistemic-protocols --plugin epharmogeSurface potential gaps at decision points — /gap (συνείδησις: knowing-together)
Route upstream epistemic deficits and evaluate execution-time risks — /attend (προσοχή: attention)
Validate structural mapping between domains — /ground (ἀναλογία: a proportion)
Define epistemic boundaries per decision — /bound (ὁρισμός: a bounding)
Achieve certain comprehension of AI work — /grasp (κατάληψις: a grasping firmly)
Infer context insufficiency before execution — /inquire (αἴτησις: a requesting)
Automatic context engineering — observes your coding sessions and generates rules, suggestions, skills, and hooks so Claude gets smarter on your codebase over time
Analyze Claude Code agent session transcripts to identify inefficiencies, anti-patterns, repeated mistakes, missing tooling opportunities, and user frustration signals for continuous improvement
The epistemic-posture layer for AI coding agents. Ships the Reasoning Surface protocol, named failure-mode counters, operator profile schema, and workflow loop as Claude Code skills, agents, and hooks. Posture first. Kernel outlives the tooling.
Ultra-compressed communication mode. Cuts ~75% of tokens while keeping full technical accuracy by speaking like a caveman.
Frontend design skill for UI/UX implementation